I see from Locus Online that the rest of the categories of winners of the Gaylactic Spectrum Awards were recently announced. On the one hand, diversity is nice, and I don't want to be telling any group or organization how to run their awards.
But...and you knew a "but" was coming...both the Best Short Fiction and Best Other Work categories have a three-way tie for the "winner," which is really much too much. On top of that, each category has a quite long "short list" of other nominees (eight in one case, thirteen in the other).
Again, it's not for me to tell them what to do with their awards, but -- no one is going to take seriously an award that goes to three things, and gives an honorable mention to more than a dozen others. It's spreading what little prestige they might have too far, until it's meaningless.
(But I'm a bit torn, since one of the many winners is David Gerrold's story "In the Quake Zone," from Mike Resnick's anthology Down These Dark Spaceways -- which my old boss Ellen Asher acquired and published back at the old place. So that's kind of like seeing a child -- OK, a stepchild -- grow up and make good.)
Perhaps the thing to do might be to create a "Gaylactic Recommended" reading list each year, of stories that they think are really excellent and promote diversity. That would allow them to put out a long list that doesn't look like a mistake. But an award should go to one thing -- or, in rare cases, two -- not to a laundry list. Any award that wants to be taken seriously needs to keeps its final lists tight -- I'd say no more than six, maybe seven nominees, and one winner.
We don't live in Lake Wobegon, and saying that we're all equally tall, handsome, and smart does no one any good.
Also? As long as I'm already complaining? The "Other Work" category includes a poem, an entire series of one TV show, two episodes of another TV show, yet a third TV show in its entirety, several movies, both American and Japanese flavors of comics, and some anthologies. That's not a category; it's a random list of stuff.
The Gaylactic Spectrum Awards could have the importance in the genre of the Tiptrees, and help to focus debate and thoughts about the genre the way the Tiptrees have. But that will only be if they first focus themselves.
2 comments:
I don't know the behind-the-scenes details on this award, so the mechanics of how you end up with a three-way tie are something to which I cannot speak. I note, however, that even awards with large electorates like the Hugo Awards can and have had ties. I don't think that there has ever been a three-way tie, but it's mathematically possible. In fact, in a typical five-way race, if the vote split exactly five ways, you'd end up with a five-way tie. (This is extremely unlikely, of course.)
Until WSFS changed its rules to require the Hugo vote totals to be published, there was some suspicion that past "ties" were cases of the administrators deciding "it's close, so we'll call it a tie."
While there is a tie-breaking mechanism for Instant Runoff Voting (preponderance of first-preference votes), WSFS doesn't use it because we've decided that it's okay to give a trophy to all of the tied candidates. It's only when you must elect one and only one candidate (like, say, a Worldcon site selection) that you have to apply the tie-breaker rule.
It's juried and...
The Judges will discuss the works before making their decision. The Judges will be allowed to make their final decision by whatever method they select as a group, whether that be a discussion leading to consensus or an actual vote of some form.
...it's an opaque process that can change each year. (I doubt it changes much, if at all, since the administrator hasn't changed, IIRC.)
Multiple ties and 3-ways ties aren't new to the award. 2000 had two 2-way and one 3-way ties, i.e., half the categories that year. I heard comments like Andrews in 2000 after the awards and basically agree with him/them.
Post a Comment