Locus has posted the Recommended Reading list from their February issue, and, as usual, it contains neverly everything even remotely worth reading from the previous year.
There are 24 SF novels (including what I thought was a fantasy trilogy), 18 Fantasy novels, 10 First novels, 11 Young Adult novels, 20 Collections, 26 Anthologies, 11 Non-Fiction books, and 10 Art books. Not counting the short fiction -- which would add up to several more book-length works -- that's one hundred and thirty books.
Now, I'm a pretty quick reader, but even I only get through about a hundred to a hundred and twenty "real" books a year -- so just keeping up with the Locus list every year is a full-time job. In fact, it's too much for most people, especially anyone who wants to read a book that isn't SF, Fantasy, or Horror -- I know even expressing such a desire is heresy, but I stand by it.
And, even with all the reading I do in the field, I've only read 29 of these books so far (though I do have another 18 of them already, so I could read them immediately, given time). Even if I read all of that, it's still less than half of the list.
I'm not sure if the lesson here is "we're living in times of abundant Good Stuff" or that "Locus's list is too long and unfocused to be helpful." But it's somewhere in between those two, I bet.
2 comments:
How about: The Locus list is the work of many different people, each of whom have only read a subset of the works mentioned.
Now you can argue as to whether this is a good or bad thing, but that's how it comes to be as it is.
I think the truth may lie somewhere between your post and Cheryl's comment. I do think the list can be confusing. People don't really know how it's compiled, what goes into it, why something does or doesn't make the list. There was a time, many years ago, when I would try to read everything on the list. I wouldn't even consider doing such a thing now.
Post a Comment