Today's book is in the same vein as Sherman's - luckily, they have very different focuses and audiences. Sherman's book was a show-biz history, for a show-biz publisher - heavy on the personalities and the work they did, and on connections to similar projects before and after. It also was a pretty general-reader-friendly history of the show itself, the careers of the major players since (they were all fairly young, and didn't have much of a career to speak of before, except for Joel Hodgson), and where "riffing" came from in popular culture and what has happened in that space since the show was first cancelled in 1999.
Mystery Science Theater 3000: A Cultural History is a more academic book, by two professors, Matt Foy and Christopher J. Olson. It seems to be a bit shorter than Sherman, but substantially denser, and vastly more interested in what riffing means - the stance of the audience to a creative work, the interplay between an existing work and commentary on it, and things like that. (Sample sentence: "The series also operates as a form of culture jamming, a type of protest used to disrupt media culture and its attendant cultural institutions such as corporate advertising" on p.46.)
It does also include the history of the show, with plenty of quotes from the major players from articles and publicity material of the time. It's just as well-researched as Sherman, maybe more so, with a nine-page bibliography and fifteen pages of notes in the backmatter. But it is vastly less concerned about what these people did and vastly more interested in the why of it and particularly what it all means.
Academics gonna academic, of course. And the subtitle is "A Cultural History" - this is part of a larger series from its publisher about what specific TV shows mean in popular culture, what they stand for or represent or indicate.
I generally agree with Foy and Olson's connections and find them interesting, while still thinking this book is a tad dry and much less general-reader-friendly than the others I mentioned above. If you want a general history of the show and its main players, Sherman is probably better for you.
But if you want to think about what it means for an audience to add their own jokes to an artistic work - or to seek out kinds of art that embed commentary on top of an existing work - this book will give you a lot of mull over. And if you are an academic, or have that background, it will be more familiar and accessible to you.












