Books Read: September 2026

As I always say: this is mostly an index, and mostly for me. But here's what I read last month:

Ben Passmore, Black Arms to Hold You Up (9/1)

Grégory Mardon, Incognito, Book 1: Perfect Victims (digital, 9/2)

Gary Groth & Eric Reynolds, editor, MOME, Vol. 1 (digital, 9/3)

Martha Wells, Queen Demon (9/3)

Faith Erin Hicks, The Adventures of Superhero Girl (Expanded Edition) (digital, 9/4)

Liniers, Night Stories: Folktales from Latin America (9/5)

Ross Macdonald, The Drowning Pool (9/5)

Peter Bagge, The Complete Hate, Vol. 2 (digital, 9/6)

Chris Roberson, Michael Avon Oeming, & Chris O'Halloran, Shadow of the Golden Crane (digital, 9/7)

Ian Frazier, Nobody Better, Better Than Nobody (digital, 9/7)

Juan Diaz Canales & Junajo Guarnido, Blacksad, Vol. 3: Red Soul (digital, 9/12)

Charles M. Schulz, The Complete Peanuts, 1959 to 1960 (9/13)

Hayao Miyazaki, Starting Point: 1979-1996 (9/17)

Roy Thomas & Jan Duursema, Elric: The Vanishing Tower (digital, 9/19)

Ray Davies, Waterloo Sunset (9/19)

Steve Cuzor, The Red Badge of Courage (digital, 9/20)

P.G. Wodehouse, Ring for Reeves (9/20)

Jeff Lemire, Matt Kindt, & David Rubín, Cosmic Detective (digital, 9/26)

Nancy Peña, Madame Cat (digital, 9/27)

Loren D. Estleman, Don't Look for Me (9/27)

Next month I will read some more books, you betcha.

Antick Musings Is Old Enough to Drink Today!

As of today, Antick Musings is twenty-one years old. That may seem impressive, but I have two children older than that. I also tend to see only the things that annoy me about the blog (my own badly-worded or trite thoughts, this horrible layout that I don't know if I even could change at this point).

But: yay! I suppose.

Every year on this day, I intend to post about the glorious holiday, and have succeeded most years. (I missed most of the big round numbers, due to a flaw in my character.) Since I'm starting to type this post almost a month ahead of time, it might actually happen this year.

(If you're reading this, and there's just some vague apology below, and it's late November: oops, I didn't.)

History of the Blog: Links to Links

For me, blogging often devolves into links to links that in turn link to other things. The Glorious Anniversary is no exception, so here's the history: first, second, third, fourth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth (published two months late and substantially shorter than the others), eleventh, twelfth, thirteenth, fourteenth, fifteenth (much shorter than usual, but on time), seventeenth, nineteenth and twentieth.

You may note that several years are missing in that list.

Yes. Yes, they are.

And let me quote a lightly edited version of what I wrote last year about what I grandly call The Myth of Antick Musings, because it's still as true as it was then:

I started this blog as practice, since the book-club company I worked for at the time was going to start up a bunch of blogs, and I would be tasked to write the one for the Science Fiction Book Club (SFBC). That corporate blog was scrubbed from the Internet long ago, and the company has changed hands several times. It may well be entirely out of business now; I see that Columbia House just died. So the fact that my half-assed practice blog is still running while the SFBC itself seems to be gone, well, that's a sign of something in the world, I guess, though I don't count it as a win.

After I was cast out of the SFBC (and, though I didn't realize it at the time, editorial work and the SFF field in general), this blog turned into exactly what I thought it never could, should, or would be: a book blog. Oh, well.

I used to watch moves and write about them here. I used to post notes and links to random things actually happening in the real world, too! We truly are living in the worst possible timeline.

History of the Blog: Easily Manipulated Metrics

At this point in the annual post, I traditionally throw in a table of the number of blog posts each year. Why? Would any reader care? I doubt it, but, somewhere deep in my psyche, I suppose I see it as the Blogging KPI, and so I must track it.

• 2025-2026 -- 406 posts
• 2024-2025 -- 407 posts
• 2023-2024 -- 405 posts
• 2022-2023 -- 410 posts
• 2021-2022 -- 279 posts
• 2020-2021 -- 265 posts
• 2019-2020 -- 55 posts
• 2018-2019 -- 178 posts
• 2017-2018 -- 368 posts
• 2016-2017 -- 263 posts
• 2015-2016 -- 144 posts
• 2014-2015 -- 258 posts
• 2013-2014 -- 434 posts
• 2012-2013 -- 285 posts
• 2011-2012 -- 332 posts
• 2010-2011 -- 445 posts
• 2009-2010 -- 711 posts
• 2008-2009 -- 880 posts
• 2007-2008 -- 834 posts
• 2006-2007 -- 841 posts
• 2005-2006 -- 809 posts

Anyone who cared could track my level of ennui, at least on a yearly level, from the above. I will note a remarkable consistency over the past four years: I've figured out a habit that works, and I am a creature of habit, so...let's see how long it can last.    

I had a second blog - I know, but that's just the way we lived then - for a few years in the teens. It was called Editorial Explanations, and was snarky comments about editorial cartoons. I included those in my Post-Count KPI for while, but now I don't.

The Inevitable Links: Posts About Books

Antick Musings did turn into a book blog, first gradually (when I thought I still had a chance to get another editorial job) and then all at once (when I realized that would never happen).

Most of the posts here, for the last decade or more, are about books. So the bulk of this anniversary post, every year, is links to those posts, using sentences I wrote that I'm still inordinately fond of. Yes, this is a hugely self-indulgent thing - I do it every year, and I'm going to do it again.

Comedy duos have to be contrasts - the wacky one and the one that tries to keep it together, for example. The optimist and the pessimist. It doesn't have to be a gag man and a straight man, but that's pretty common.

It's my blog, I can do it however I want.

Heavy Bright is a positive, mostly uplifting story about fighting evil by whacking it with a spoon.

But the thing about life is that you can always do something today, even if you haven't done it for twenty years.

It isn't, in any appreciable way, the end of a trilogy, mind you. But you can definitely think of it like that.

We are all prisoners of the people we actually are, as we keep trying to be the people we want to be.

As I said, this is a horror story, so our main characters don't gather their forces and battle the monsters to save the world - that would be fantasy. They also don't find out exactly how it works, figure out how to counter it, and do so - that would be a thriller. And they don't gather evidence and present it to some authority who can shut down Home - that would be a mystery.

The promiscuous must always want to have sex with us, right? Since we are clearly wonderful and special, since we are us.

Some SF novels seem to predict the world we actually got, and are brought back out of the depths and lauded for that, as if being right was the point of fiction.

Digital books have a lot of advantages - they can be cheaper, they're definitely lighter, you can fit many more of them in the same space, they can be accessed almost immediately from almost anywhere, and so forth. But they can also mysteriously disappear in a way that never happens with physical books.

Prime has become a legend, off doing whatever in the hinterlands, but the Last Good Ruler calls him, using the Secret Codes of Yore, and tasks Prime with finding a new home for humanity among the stars, because that's exactly the kind of job where you want a murderous and unimaginative centuries-old cyborg inculcated with a toxic mindset.

That could be one marker of liberal vs. conservative, I suppose: the cartoon version is that liberals bend over backwards to "include" others, no matter what convolutions they have to go through from moment to moment in doing so, while conservatives refuse to change anything about themselves ever, gleefully doubling-down on their worst aspects and making those the core of their personalities.

Sorry, just a little joke there. Of course they beat the old man who is an alternate-world version of their father and grandfather to death. That's much better.

With translations, there's a lot of "I think" and "here's what has made it to my side of the ocean" - it's a big world, and how someone looks at home is not always the same as how he dresses up to go visiting.

If your world has dozens of races, all hugely distinctive from each other, the fact that some of them have darker skin than others will tend to seem somewhat less important than the fact that, for example, some of them are mammals and some are herptiles, or the whole predator/prey thing.

There's one exceptionally circumlocutious section almost smack-dab in the middle about the word "queer" and whether or not it applies to Gorey, which I take to mean that Gorey was probably gay but either led a mostly celibate life as an adult or that his affairs were so scandalous and so well-hidden that they can't be discussed in public even fifty years later.

In her wanderings, she needs to do quite a bit of bending and stretching, squeezing through tight spaces, lying languidly reading or tossing restlessly while asleep, standing thinking with hands on hips or reaching over her head to get something. Did I mention she does all of those things naked? She does them naked.

As long as we can understand how this world works, it can still be funny: we don't need to live in that world ourselves, or, frankly, for that world to have ever existed.

Sometimes you just want to be convinced that the old verities are still true. The sun rises in the east, robins nest in the early spring, and Andrews McMeel publishes cute little books of relationship cartoons for impulse purchases.

If you have the visual tastes of a hyperactive fifteen-year-old-boy, this will be the greatest comic in the history of everything. For anyone else, adjust your expectations accordingly.

It's not that I don't think CEOs aren't sociopaths who would take any action that benefited themselves; it's just that it's so criminal, and would be massively obvious in retrospect, that I don't believe he would be stupid enough to believe he could get away with it as depicted.

Meanwhile, behind all this, the general public - as always in superhero comics, a stupid mass of sheep-like morons who can't understand that superpowered people are better and special and their rightful masters - has responded to the Second Cataclysm by turning against all superheroes, on the grounds that alien gods never seem to try to eat planets that don't have superheroes on them.

There's a kind of mom who has five or more kids, all named things like Jacob and Hannah. There's a kind of mom who has two or three kids, with names you can't predict. And there's a kind of mom who has just one, with a name like Magnus or Tinkerbell.

But that is their plan, and they insist that it requires a giant robot crab, and, like all fiendish plans hatched by secret societies of multiple villains, it works pretty well for a while.

As often with Hernandez, his pages are interesting and his artistic choices bold - sometimes bold in the "that is great" sense; sometimes in the "why on earth would he expect that to work?" sense - and I do believe that he thinks these pieces come together to form an overall narrative.

As my old boss would say, why spend a year writing a novel when a really good one only costs a few dollars?

The world is big and full of things, some of which are vaguely familiar even if you've never seen them before - I guess I find that weirdly comforting.

Stories don't have to be true to be good stories - frankly, it's more often the opposite.

Supremacists who make up lies about a minority to foment anger and try to get them thrown out of the country are common in many places.

Then again, I could be wrong. Perhaps the children yearn for stories of old werewolves and ominous tigers. Stranger things have happened.

And, lastly, I occasionally give up on a book mid-stream: I don't have to love a book to finish it, but I think if I find myself talking to the author, in my head: "Jesus Christ, Hughes, read the fucking room," then the book has lost an essential connection to me as a reader and I shouldn't try to make larger statements about it.

The Inevitable Links: Everything Else

I have posts about other things - not as many, and not as much as in the early days of the blog. In 2026, for the fourth year in a row, I had a series of posts about songs on Mondays. I think I'm not as good at writing about music as I am about books - some of you may have unkind thoughts, wondering if that is even possible, but I will ignore you - but I do it because I like these songs and I want to surface things I like here.

I post lists of new books - only physical books, but however and whenever I get them - here, under the overall title Reviewing the Mail (which I stole from Chuck Klosterman, who doesn't seem to be using it anymore). I've called those posts different things occasionally, too, mostly by mistake.

I also do quotes from the books I read - every Saturday as Quote of the Week, and twice a year in a closet-cleaning exercise. (Also available from that link, in big clumps on New Year's Eve and the Sunday closest to Independence Day.)

As The Blog Lurches Into a Twenty-Second Year

I gave up on big pronouncements and predictions long ago. Given my druthers, I'd be coming up on my fifteenth year or so as Editor-in-Chief of the SFBC. But they never were my druthers: that's the lesson life teaches us all.

I do expect to keep doing whatever you call what I do here. I am massively a creature of habit, and this blog is about five of those habits at this point. Take that as a promise, or a threat.

But it's good that the blog is old enough to drink, now: it takes pressure off me. I've been on a blood thinner - for six or seven years, I think? I can't even remember; I've been on various heart meds since '02 - which has meant that I can't drink. But, maybe, in some odd way, I can think that Antick Musings is doing it for me.

May your own creative endeavors similarly take over aspects of your own life, like kudzu in the summertime: that's my valediction this year.

Quote of the Week: Another Morning

I thought about sitting up. The various governing bodies in my mind all agreed that this would be a good thing, but there were disputes over the timetable.

 - Walter Mosely, Blonde Faith, p.174

Trudeau & Doonesbury: A Biography by Joshua Kendall

I was an avid Doonesbury reader in my youth; I assembled all of the books eventually (up to about 2009, though I might have missed the rare one about the TV special) and read it daily in the paper. But I lost all those books in my 2011 flood, and never felt the need to either re-buy the old ones or get any of the new ones since then. G.B. Trudeau, the strip's creator, went to Sunday-only not too long after that, too, which killed one of the best aspects of the strip: its density and the way it told extended stories among a large cast, intersecting with the issues of the day. Doonesbury as a Sunday-only isn't the same thing at all; in a very real sense, the strip ended a decade ago.

But a decade after something ended is a good time for a retrospective, isn't it?

Joshua Kendall, a Yalie like Trudeau who has been a noted reporter and the author of several previous biographies, tells the story of Doonesbury the strip here, along with some biographical material about Trudeau. The book is called Trudeau & Doonesbury: A Biography, but it's not that much of a biography and it's much more Doonesbury than Trudeau.

On the other hand, Kendall actually got what seem to be extensive interviews with the famously reclusive and press-shy Trudeau - who famously went seventeen years at the height of the strip without speaking to a single reporter - and got him on the record at least a little bit about his personal life. So I'm not exactly complaining: Kendall probably delivered as much of a biography as the reclusive Trudeau would allow.

Also, Trudeau has had a frankly boring life, in the best WASP preppy manner. A WASP's name famously should appear in the paper only three times: birth, marriage, and death. Trudeau is already way over-exposed by the standard of his people. He had a big success right out of college with his first major project, and stuck mostly with permutations of that project for fifty years. He married another media figure (TV host Jane Pauley), which sounds like it could lead to drama, but they have had a quiet, apparently entirely happily life together, with three kids and no scandals, from all accounts. Add to that the fact that Doonesbury is an outward-facing strip, about things in the real (political, social, entertainment) world, not about anything personal, and Kendall had a much harder job than someone like David Michaelis, who wrote about Charles Schulz and his strip full of personal psychological insights.

Kendall does have the usual initial couple of chapters to cover Trudeau's ancestors and young life (through college and the proto-Doonesbury Bull Tales); it's the most interesting, new, and fresh material in the book, telling us the things we don't already know. (Trudeau had an ulcer in middle school! That was actually the reason he was classified 4-F in the draft! He also wrote and staged plays for years as a kid - which is interesting and new but deeply unsurprising once you learn about it.) After that, the book's chapters mostly align to eras of Doonesbury: Watergate, the rest of the '70s, Trudeau's first hiatus and the Reagan years, the big shift to post-college life, B.D. and the focus on wars and warriors, and one last chapter on Trudeau's long history mocking Our Current President.

It is not quite a critical reappraisal of Doonesbury; Kendall stays primarily on the reporting side. But he does map out the eras and major concerns of the strip, so this is a valuable book for anyone who might want to do that critical reappraisal.

Kendall also takes advantage of being an official biography to use a lot of Trudeau materials: there's a relevant Doonesbury strip on about half of the pages, including a lot of Sundays at full-page size. He also reprints other letters and ephemera throughout, since the book was already being designed that way - it's a much more intensely designed and carefully laid-out book than the standard biography, and a fine model for anyone doing a biography of a visual artist or cartoonist. (That old standard, the insert section, is nice as far as it goes, but having the art actually on the same pages as the relevant text is vastly superior.)

So Trudeau & Doonesbury is perhaps not as surprising or informative as one might hope: Trudeau is still private, and more than a little boring. Kendall does a good job with the materials he has, and the access Trudeau gave him, but the back half of the book does somewhat turn into "and then there was a two-week sequence about Dan Quayle, who Trudeau depicted as a feather." It's worth it for fans of the strip and political junkies of the last few decades, and those who still get a frisson from the iconic strips like "Guilty! Guilty! GUILTY!"

Cosmonauts of the Future, Vol. 3: Resurrection by Lewis Trondheim & Manu Larcenet

On this side of the Atlantic, they all hit at once: in 2018, Europe Comics published (digitally) translations of the three Cosmonauts of the Future books, all turned into English by Mercedes Claire Gilliom.

But, in their original life, the first two both came out in 2000 and this third and final book - Cosmonauts of the Future, Vol. 3: Resurrection - was four years later. So that original audience might have expected, or at least have a reasonable suspicion, that the characters were a few years older this time.

A reader who pays really close attention and has the details of the first two books at his fingertips could have figured that out from the early pages of the book, too - our heroes, Gildas and Martina, are taller, and there's a reference to something "eight months ago" on the first page, an event that didn't happen in the previous books. They also think it's 2033, which would place it more precisely in time if I remembered what year they thought it was in the previous books.

(They are not quite correct, for reasons which become clear as the book goes on.)

They're not on the planet Mawis anymore; they're traveling around in a spaceship, along with two aliens (one in a human suit, their former teacher for killing stinky aliens). They don't say why, but we assume they're looking for the rest of humanity: Gildas and Martina are clones of space explorers who died in a crash on Mawis, and, now that they're growing up, it makes sense that they'd want to find their own people.

They do find a human-crewed space station, which confusingly (for them) seems to be a museum of their lives, exactly like the Mawis-created replica of their childhood that they grew up in. And that's somewhat how this book goes: it's simulacra and clones all the way down.

Gildas and Martina don't learn this for a while - they are very confused, and running about at high speed, often chased by clones of themselves using dangerous weaponry - but they have found human civilization, and it is not at peace. There's a faction run by their daughter Celta and a faction run by Gildas's sister Gaelle, and both use clones of the two of them - the obviously perfect human beings - as soldiers. Both sides are heavily armed; each is dedicated to the extermination of the other; neither is particularly amenable to persuasion or anything more peaceful than a ray-gun.

Do Gildas and Martina manage to bring peace to human civilization, leaning somewhat heavily on the fact that they are "the originals"? (I don't see why their clone-ness is terribly different from the hordes of clone soldiers, but it works, so I won't sweat it.) Yes, they do.

The story is a bit more confused than the first two books, and ramps up the slapstick running-and-fighting material from the second book as well. It does feel a bit like writer Lewis Trondheim and artist Manu Larcenet were escalating with each book, and hit their limit quickly with this third one. It is still fun, zippy adventure, but a reader can definitely see why they would think they'd exhausted the premise by this point.

The Kingdom, Vol.1: Anne by Benoit Feroumont

I was sure this book was different, but I didn't know how much or in what ways. It looked like it might be for younger readers, which was hugely different from the first book I read by its creator, Benoit Feroumont: Gisèle & Bèatrice.

After a bit of research - mostly trying to navigate a computer-translated version of Feroumont's detailed Wikipedia page - I believe that The Kingdom series is more typical of Feroumont's work than Gisèle & Bèatrice was, but there's a certain sharp wit and love for antic mischief that I suspect is common in his work. After reading this one, I don't think The Kingdom series is specifically for young readers, but it's all-ages in a European sense: full of things certain American readers (you know the kind) would be shocked to give to their little darlings, but pitched to be understandable to an audience roughly ten and up and reasonable for that audience for most normal human beings.

The full title is The Kingdom, Vol. 1: Anne; it was originally published in 2009, has colors by Feroumont's wife Christelle Coopman, and was translated by Mercedes Claire Gilliom for this 2017 Europe Comics edition. (There are ten books in the series; the six that existed before 2015 were translated in the years of Europe Comics' flourishing and the rest seem to be sitting in limbo for now.)

It's one of those lightly fantasy stories set in a pocket kingdom - small enough to be just the unnamed capital city and as much countryside as needed for stories, small enough that the King can be a local figure, and specifically with no neighbors that impinge on the story. This one, I think, sets up a lot of the characters and situations for later in the series. In particular, this one is about the title character, Anne, the friendly, happy, ultra-competent maid who has been taking care of the King - this isn't the kind of book with a deep sense of the organizational structure of a big house - who loses her job and has to move on.

You see, she's been frightened by owls hooting in the night, and so has been sleeping in the King's bed to avoid them. (He's the usual good-natured-but-ineffectual doddering old guy, along Lord Emsworth lines, so there's no thought or possibility of hanky-panky.) But a flock of little yellow (talking) birds have just arrived in town: this is annoying and disruptive, but not seen as particularly weird or unnatural. They're gossip-mongers - I might say "shit-stirrers," to be more precise - who delight in telling people things that will annoy, anger, or frustrate them, and particularly things that will cause them to fight with each other.

Anyway, the birds told the mean Queen about Anne and the King, so she fired Anne. The King gives Anne an old house down in the city, which she is to turn into a tavern. On the way there, she has some slapstick adventures, attempting to attack the birds and running into the large blacksmith's apprentice François, who immediately falls madly in love with her. (This, I gather, will be a major plot engine for later in the series.)

Anne does find her new home, which is a dump. But the birds more-or-less befriend her - they're still jerks - and help to clean it up. And she does turn it into a tavern. The climax of the story is the opening night of that tavern, when the King's children - two goofy sons and a more sensible daughter - come in disguise to patronize that tavern, plus a large contingent of the palace guards, sent by the Queen to give the impression that the tavern is raucous and unpleasant, so it will fail.

Does the character whose name is in the title of a the first book in a comic adventure series succeed despite all odds? Of course she does.

Feroumont tells this story in a broad way, full of jokes and big body language - it's a funny book that makes very little attempt to be subtle. And it's mostly tween-friendly, assuming your tweens aren't shocked by the "sleeping"-with-the-King plot-starter.

Blonde Faith by Walter Mosley

I used to read Walter Mosley books regularly - at least the Easy Rawlins series, which I devoured in the '90s. But first kids, then my exile from editorial work slowed down my reading - and mysteries took the first and most severe hit in that slowdown.

So I now realize that 2007's Blonde Faith - the tenth book in the series, of sixteen novels and some short fiction so far - is the first book in this series that I've read in probably twenty years and only the third Mosley book I've read at all this century.

Add to that the fact that I'm a white East Coast guy reading a mystery series about a Black detective in historical LA and points nearby, and I might need to warn you that you have no reason to take my opinion as having any weight whatsoever.

With that said: this book is set in early 1967. As usual, the series hero is Easy Rawlins, a man originally from Houston, a WWII veteran, and a guy who's tangled in his own head all of the time. (That's been true throughout the series: Easy is a smart man who is good at the private-detecting work he does, off and on, but not as good at getting through the interpersonal stuff in his own life.) He's forty-seven at this point, though still, as seen in this book, chasing women that are literally younger than his own stepson. (Catching them, too: it's that kind of book.)

That also means that this series, since it's in the first person from Easy's POV, gets stuck in his head. It's been a long time since I read the earlier books, so I can't make a comparison, but this one doesn't have as much plot as you might expect from its three hundred pages. It's basically: Easy looks for two guys, both old friends, and eventually finds them together. Some other things happen along the way, but not a whole lot of complications or sideplots.

Meanwhile, Easy is tormented because the great love of his life - or at least his recent life; he has capacity to chase women in bulk and has for decades at this point - Bonnie Shay, is getting married to her other boyfriend, an African prince. There's some complicated backstory there that might have come up in previous books or might have been between books: Easy's daughter Feather needed some tricky medical treatment, and the prince paid for it, but his price was Bonnie, who he took from Easy at that point. (But he's supposedly a good guy, so this might be somewhat colored by Easy's memory and prejudices.)

The two missing men are Christmas Black, a former Green Beret caught up somehow (on the "trying to stop them" end) with a nasty ring smuggling drugs via Vietnam, and Easy's old best friend Raymond "Mouse" Alexander, a gangster who is accused of killing Pericles Tarr. Easy tracks down Tarr, who turns out to not be dead, and meets the smugglers, who are posing as Army officers. As required by a mystery novel, the two plots somewhat intersect, because Black and Mouse know each other.

Easy's voice is compelling and believable, but I found him more than a bit whiny here, especially for a guy who bags one hottie (the woman of the title), is well on his way to a relationship with a college-aged additional hottie, and flirts very successfully with one or two others I can think of - all while being despondent because he lost Bonita entirely because he didn't bother to get in touch with her for an extended period of time. A man can definitely protest too much.

And the mystery is a bit thin here. Easy is just trying to find two men, who he's pretty sure will be not that far away and who are both so good at violence that it's unlikely they'll be in any serious trouble. And that turns out to be the case. The tension is mostly about Bonnie, and about Easy's own internal demons - this is closer to a literary novel than a mystery. I do like literary novels, admittedly, but I prefer their heroes not be utterly obnoxious twerps, and Easy is really close to that line here.

All of This and Nothing: Songs That No One Will Hear

"All of This and Nothing" is a series of weekly posts, each about one song I really love, by an artist I haven't featured in the previous This Year, Portions For Foxes, or Better Things series. It alternates between Obscure and Famous songs; feel free to argue either way if you're so inclined. See the introduction for more.

This is possibly the most Obscure of my obscure songs: a single from one of those bands that is basically one person: the Swedish indypop "band" we are soldiers we have guns. (Stylized in all-lower case, for maximum indy cred, I guess.)

we are soldiers we have guns ran for the back half of the Aughts, roughly, with a few EPs and at least one full-length (get up, get out, - still on Bandcamp for anyone interested to look for more). The one person in this case was Malin Dahlberg; no idea what she's doing these days but I hope it's creative and fulfilling and wonderful.

Songs That No One Will Hear is the first we are soldiers we have guns song I ever heard; I think it was featured on Fingertips (which has been the way I discovered a lot of bands over the years - might be good for you, too. If not, my general advice is to find some outlet that is similar enough to your tastes that you always find what they feature interesting).

The lyrics don't exist anywhere online, and we are soldiers (I'll stay lower-case, but I have to abbreviate it somehow) has a lo-fi sound - so untangling exactly what Dahlberg is singing might not be worth the effort.

But, for a lovely mostly-quiet song from an obscure band from an obscure part of the world, Songs That No One Will Hear is almost a platonically perfect title, and the song itself lives up to it. Just listen.

Reviewing the Mail: Week of September 26, 2026

Three books for this week - one I bought myself (trying to use an old gift card that didn't go through in the end, curse the luck) and two new books from Tachyon. The Tachyon books will be first, according to my usual rules.

Mary G. Thompson has written short fiction and novels for younger readers, but I think Precious Children is her first novel for adults. It's a SFnal horror novel about cloning, of the replacing-loved-ones style, focused on one family who seem to have awful luck in the mortality of their children but luckily are rich enough that those children can be replaced and their existence continued - the question being how closely that existence continues, and what happens to the person previously using the brain that becomes the newest version of their beloved son. It's just been published by Tachyon.

Also from Tachyon, even more recently published if I can trust the metadata, is a new collection of short fiction by the least positive man in Hard SF, Peter Watts. Fold Catastrophes collects eleven stories originally in various anthologies, websites, and magazines, going back to 2013. There's also a new original story at the end.

And last of the three is the book I bought myself. I've gotten behind on Charles Stross's Laundry-verse novels, possibly because they do try to be substantially more depressing and gloom-soaked than the real world, which has been a tricky thing this past decade. I believe Quantum of Nightmares is the second of the "New Management" series, set officially after the apocalypse, and following Dead Lies Dreaming, which I wasn't super-fond of. This one seems to be less "Peter Pan-inspired goofy young people putting on a show," though, so I hope to give it a try. I also already have the sequel to this on the shelf, and want to get to the supposed final actual Laundry novel The Regicide Report. (Which, come to think of it, I could probably just read without hitting the others first - but it looks even gloomier than Standard Stross, which is incredibly gloomy indeed.)

Quote of the Week: A Relapse of Poetry

I have generally found, as I have gone around the world, that people are tolerant and ready to forgive, and in our little community it was never held against Rodney Spelvin that he had once been a poet and a very virulent one, too; the sort of man who would produce a slim volume of verse bound in squashy mauve leather at the drop of a hat, mostly on the subject of sunsets and pixies.

    - P.G. Wodehouse, "Rodney Has a Relapse," p.131 in Nothing Serious

Leonardo the Genius (Vol. 1) by Bob De Groot & Turk

The credit on the book just says "De Groot and Turk," but other official descriptions include De Groot's first name. I'd have to go to a secondary source to learn that Turk is actually an artist named Philippe Liégeois. Similarly, this material looks to be forty or fifty years old, but the book itself gives a 2002 publication date in French and a 2016 date for this translation by Montana Kane.

The same secondary source notes that the Léonard comics - the terminal "o" pops up in Dutch and English translations, and possibly elsewhere, but the original French and Belgian editions don't have it - began in 1974. I think this book collects '70s stories in a package - possibly the start of an entire repackaged series - from the early days of this century.

This is one of those works of humor that seem to be very popular in their home culture - there have been fifty-seven volumes in French, continuing to the present day - but have not travelled as well. At least, it's barely traveled into English, which is the only bit I can really evaluate.

The premise is simple: there's this genius, living in a small town in a vaguely Renaissance world (but with some Renaissance-versions of modern things when the jokes require them), who invents crazy things. He looks a lot like Leonardo Da Vinci. This is the first book of his adventures: Leonardo the Genius.

It starts out with single-pagers, and even the longer stories only last four or five pages. I see that this series originated in magazines, and might still appear in magazines today, which explains that.

The jokes are silly and broad, which makes me wonder why it hasn't traveled into English more successfully. There is something vaguely European about it: like Asterix, there's an underlying sense that you have to have at least a little bit of cultural/historical grounding to get the jokes, and maybe general American audiences react badly to that.

Over the course of this book, Leonard hires an assistant - just called "Disciple" here, though I gather he gets a name in some later stories. This allows even more slapstick, and for the inevitable "guy wrapped up in bandages in a hospital bed" results of some less-successful experiments.

As I said, it's all just a bit old-fashioned - big squared panels with tightly ruled lines, squared-off dialogue balloons, that mid-century style of humor, a big-nose cartooning style from Turk - but that's just a sign of the era it came from. A few of the jokes are unfortunate now - there's one in which Leonardo invents the first airplane, and then a swarthy guy tries to hijack it to Cuba, ha ha ha - but most of it is durable all-ages humor that still basically works.

I find this kind of series fascinating, because it's so obviously A Big Deal in the land of its birth, probably hyped every year when a new volume comes out and the big birthday/Christmas wish for thousands of kids, and yet it's totally unknown in my country. The world is big and full of things, some of which are vaguely familiar even if you've never seen them before - I guess I find that weirdly comforting. The book itself...ehhh, it was OK. I think it's a lot more resonant if you grew up with it.

Glorious Summers, Vol. 3: Little Miss Esterel by Zidrou & Jordi Lafebre

This is not my nostalgia. But, reading this book, I was reminded that the whole series is about the nostalgia of people around my age and their parents, remembering the era when the parents were young and energetic and the children were young and free.

Glorious Summers is a six-book series, written by Belgian Zidrou and drawn by Spaniard Jordi Lafebre. They were published in French quickly in the teens, and the first five translated into English - this third volume by Laura Vergnaud - for publication in 2018 by Europe Comics. They're digital-only; Europe is not quite a full-line publisher, and acts mostly as a proof-of-concept and an engine for licensing material to American/British publishers who would then bring out their own editions. Each one is set in a particular year, and tells the story of one summer vacation of the Faldérault family.

So Southbound! began with a frame story in what seemed to be roughly the present day, with an aged Pierre Faldérault and his wife Maddie, before flashing back to 1973, when they had four young and rambunctious children. The Calanque dove right into 1969, without a frame story, when the Faldérault family had slightly younger children and only three of them.

This third book is Little Miss Esterel - that's the model of car they drove in those first two books, and this is her story, in a way. The frame story isn't dated, but it's probably the mid-Nineties: the youngest child "Peaches" (Paulette) is still at home, in her early twenties (wearing a Nirvana T-shirt), and the other three are out, with their own lives. But the bulk of this book, like the others, is about one summer - in this case 1962, the year the Faldérault family got that Esterel and went on a two-week long vacation (minus four days; as always Pierre overruns the beginning of the holidays finishing up his comics-making work).

The family is obviously even smaller in 1962 than it was in 1969: Peaches and her older brother Louis aren't even born yet. Julie is a toddler and Nicole is a baby, still breast-feeding. But the traveling crew - in that brand-new Esterel - will include Maddie's parents as well.

She's an only child - we learn some details of why late in the book - and her parents seem old in 1962, while the Faldéraults are in their energetic mid-twenties. Maddie's father Henry - lovingly called "Fat Pop-Pop" by Julie - had a heart attack the year before, and around the same time sold his hat store and retired. He's a genial, happy man. His wife Yvette is tighter-wound and massively more controlled - we think she's been managing her husband's health (and maybe his store, and her family, and whatever else) for a long time, back to the War which still looms in their history.

Pierre thinks it will be fun to have Henry and Yvette along; that they'll drive down to the coast and camp out and Julie will love having "Fat Pop-Pop" to play with. The last of those things is true, at least.

Yvette is an inveterate organizer, with a Michelin guide in her hands, and she takes over entirely - they only make it as far as Saint-Etienne (which is reasonably far South, but not "The South" and certainly not on the Mediterranean), and settle into a hotel there. Yvette leads them around to see all the cathedrals and churches, in strict Michelin-star order.

Worse, the hotel has a Belgian-style restaurant, so they end up eating as if they were at home instead of French cuisine - but not even that, since Yvette browbeats the staff into taking frites off the menu for their entire visit, to protect Henry's heart. (And what is more Belgian than frites?)

Julie has a fine time, of course - she's a toddler. And Nicole is a baby. Yvette is having the vacation she wants, mostly - as much as she can be happy about anything. Henry is thrilled to still be alive and spending time with his family. Pierre and Maddie push back in some ways - they commandeer a wheelbarrow to act as a stroller for the girls - but the tension between Maddie and her mother simmers, until it breaks out into a full-fledged argument in the (slow, stuck-in-traffic) drive back home.

But Maddie learns things about her mother she didn't know, and Yvette learns to unbend a bit. We see the whole Faldérault family making a stop at a frites stand just over the border, the beginning of a tradition that was called out in the previous books. And the core family does have a quick camp-out, in their own backyard, back at home - we are convinced they will find ways to be happy and to do the things that strengthen their family, no matter what.

That's the nostalgia, or the story-telling aspect of it - the haze of memory that turns it all to something good in retrospect. Even a vacation you didn't love at the time becomes a good story years later.

As always with this series, the story is true and realistic, with interesting characters we care about - even Yvette, in the end. And Lafebre's art is magnificent in a clean, crisp story-telling style, with great faces in particular. Glorious Summers is a marvelous example of what comics can be: this series tells stories almost entirely outside any of the mainstreams of North American (or British, or even Japanese) comics - domestic, evocative of specific moments in the past, family-centered, lovely, small, perfectly formed. 

Into the Bewilderness by Gus Gordon

There are some signals that a book is actually for kids. Sometimes they're obvious: the shelf it sits on in a store or library, a big sticker on the spine, quotes from "little Jimmy, age 10."

Sometimes, though, you find a book in a library app, and think it could be a fable or something else quirky like that. And then you realize it's one of those stories about two people who live together Ernie-and-Bert-style, and that snaps a lot of other vague or goofy things into perspective. "This is a book for ten-year-olds," you realize, "I might enjoy it but it's not for me."

I hit that point about halfway through Gus Gordon's Into the Bewilderness, which sent me to his bio at the back of the book. He is known for writing and illustrated books for "small people," as he puts it. I think Harper Alley, the publisher here, might also be at least in part an outfit aimed at small people, though the copyright page doesn't have the age guidance I usually look for as my dead giveaway.

Anyway, this is nice and pleasant and a bit cozy, largely because it's a book for younger readers. Keep that in mind, and it's quite enjoyable.

Luis and Pablo live together in a cabin out in the middle of nowhere. We know this from the beginning of the book: it starts with a map that includes their "Bewilderness" as well as other places including "The Really Pointy Mountains" and "Grumpy Toad Valley" and "Weird rock place."

Luis is a bear who wears a sweater and a tuque; Pablo is a mole who wears overalls and glasses. Luis is the Ernie-coded one: he carries a guitar, makes up songs, and has silly ideas. Pablo is Bert-coded: always reading books, more knowledgeable, deeply grumpy.

Luis yearns for culture: shows, arts, musicals. There are none such in the middle of nowhere. Pablo notes that his people never leave this area, since his great-great-great grandfather ran off and...he leaves this story vague for a long time.

But Luis wins two tickets to a musical in the Big City, and - after some mostly-friendly banter, Pablo eventually decides to go with him. They go wait at the bus stop, finally get a bus, and take the long, circuitous (we've seen the map) ride to the Big City.

It is, indeed, Big - very different in every way from what they're used to. In interesting ways, surprising ways, fascinating ways. They go to find the theater where the musical is playing, and things don't go like they or the reader expects.

Of course, the end of the story sees them back in their cabin in the Bewilderness; books for small people must always renormalize. And we get the inevitable pitch for friendship: books for small people sometimes are about family, but most of the time - especially with a set-up like this - they lean heavily into the "friends are the best darn thing in the world" framing.

Gordon has a nice cartoony style - his self-portrait looks a bit Quentin Blake-y - and he does the vaguely-smartass dialogue and narration on a kid-appropriate level. This is a renormalizing book about the importance of friendship for ten-year-olds, but it's quite entertaining on that level.

Nothing Serious by P.G. Wodehouse

I am on a multi-year, vaguely serious plan to read "all" of P.G. Wodehouse, in the lovely little Overlook hardcovers. He wrote around a hundred books, so it'll take a while, but I've got fifty-two down now (counting this one) and eight more sitting on the shelf to be read. So I do need to track down some of the more obscure and rare books - which might mean shelling out more money than I feel like spending at the moment - but it's all doable.

(I had a somewhat different shelf of Overlook Wodehouse before my flood in 2011 - probably forty or so; no idea how distributed between read and unread - but I'm taking the current shelf as the master record, so I'll be done when I have all of them and have read them, whether that's for the first time or not.)

Some of those books spark interesting posts on this blog, since Wodehouse was a deeply entertaining and fun writer for around seventy years.

But some of them are collections of short stories, largely about golf, originally published in 1950, and my options are to give potted plot synopses of each story (boring for both of us) or a general airy overview (quick and easy for me; possibly dull and vague for you). I hope you realize which way I'm going, and will forgive me if it is dull and vague.

Nothing Serious collects ten stories originally published, if I can trust the dates on the copyright page, between 1939 and 1948. Some may also have been original to the book. It leads off with two stories of the Drones Club, follows that with five about golf narrated by the Oldest Member, and then ends with three odd stories, including one very odd one featuring Lord Emsworth selling encyclopedias in a Long Island suburb.

Wodehouse in short form tends to be concentrated: there's not as much room for complication, so it's mostly the pure young-love-thwarted plots, with one major obstacle thwarting that love which is then cleared by the end of the story. There's occasionally other plots - Emsworth sells encyclopedias, as I mentioned above, to help a young woman who is already married (and pregnant) build a nest egg - but assuming each story is going to be about this guy and the lady he loves is a solid strategy.

And these are good stories, with some fine Wodehouse prose, from the prime period of his career. There is rather a lot of golf in it; short Wodehouse seems to be about golf more often than most readers expect. (Did he write short stories for a golfing magazine? I've never dug into the question.) It's not part of any of his major series, and not famous: if you read Nothing Serious, you're, like me, deep into the Wodehouse Cult and looking for more to keep going. Luckily, as I noted, he did write about a hundred books, so you can keep going for quite a while.

All of This and Nothing: I Can See Clearly Now

"All of This and Nothing" is a series of weekly posts, each about one song I really love, by an artist I haven't featured in the previous This Year, Portions For Foxes, or Better Things series. It alternates between Obscure and Famous songs; feel free to argue either way if you're so inclined. See the introduction for more.

This week swings back to Famous, with Johnny Nash's 1972 song I Can See Clearly Now.

(Speaking of seeing clearly, I wonder if it's at all clear what my organizational structure was for this year? I don't think I ever actually said it. Both Obscure and Famous songs are running in reverse chronological order, though the two streams are entirely uncoupled, to keep them alternating. And they would have to be, since, in a weird bit of symmetry I didn't plan, only five of the Obscure ones are from before this century and only five of the Famous ones are from the current century. There's a reason for this structure, a deeply silly one which I'll explain when we hit the relevant song.)

As with all of the Famous songs, I'm assuming you know it by this point. Even if you weren't around in 1975, it's been in plenty of media; the copy I have is from the Grosse Pointe Blank soundtrack, where it runs under the opening credits in that traditional movie undercut-the-mood-with-a-poppy-song way.

The song itself is happy - purely so. There's few enough of those.

I can see clearly now, the rain is gone
I can see all obstacles in my way
Gone are the dark clouds that had me blind

There's no subtext, no hidden darkness. I was going to spin a whole theory here about how it reflected the post-Watergate mood when I realized I had the date as 1975 in error - it's actually from 1972. So I don't even have that. Just a happy song about things finally going right, after a long time when they weren't. That's plenty.