I like to think I'm a thoughtful reader. Not perfect, of course --
who is? -- but good at working out metaphors and allegories and
fictional schemas of all kinds. If I can see that there's a shape moving
under the surface of a book, I can usually make a decent guess at what
kind of leviathan lurks down there. (This may not need to be said, but
authors generally want to be understood: some things may be
obscure or subtext, but they do expect that a lot of readers will figure
them out nonetheless.)
There is something lurking behind China Mieville's short 2016 novel This Census-Taker. I would swear to that on whatever is worth swearing on. But I can't for the life of me quite figure out what that thing is.
So whatever I say about this book is at least half-wrong -- know that up front. Census-Taker
is fabulistic, the story of a deliberately unnamed Boy in a clearly
potent landscape. And I'm not going to be able to explain the
implications of that landscape, or of the actions of the characters in
this story. All I can do is tell you, if you decide to read This Census-Taker, to pay close attention and think about what everything might mean. You could be better at this than I am.
In
an unnamed country, a decade or so after an unnamed war, a
nine-year-old boy runs down the steep slope from his isolated house to
the small town nestled around a bridge over a river between two equally
sharp peaks. He says his father has killed his mother -- or perhaps the
other way around. He is comforted, taken in, and preparations are
quickly made to investigate.
Then the father appears.
The mother is not dead, he insists: the boy heard an argument, their
final breakup. The mother has left forever, gone away from this town
where she grew up (but left once, admittedly), and will never be seen
again. But she is definitely not dead, he insists again. Not at all,
though he has no proof of this.
The boy is handed over to
the father with apologies. The two return to that isolated house, where
the father is even more demanding and cold than before, as if the boy has betrayed him. And the father kills
animals, now and then -- quickly, and perhaps under a compulsion. The boy thinks the father has killed other
people, but never sees it happen. We see this all, interspersed with
memories of the time when the mother was still with them, in the way a
boy's memories can be mixed and jumbled.
Many years
later, the boy is a functionary of a larger political entity. The functionary is
telling us this story of the boy's childhood -- well, we think the two are the same person, and they probably are. But This Census-Taker
is twisty enough that you'll want to put a pin in that assumption, to
mark it. (You may need many such pins before you're done reading.) One
of the things our narrator tells us is how another functionary -- now his boss, or
the boss of the person telling the story, if that makes a difference --
came to that isolated house, and what happened there.
Does
it matter that the father is a foreigner, perhaps a refugee from that
war in the past? There's no solid indication that he was a soldier, but it's not impossible. My essential problem in trying to encompass This Census-Taker is trying to figure out what is impossible. And that list is not long.
Mieville's
voice is confident and controlling: he tells this story precisely the
way he wants to, doling out moments and sentences that glisten like
jewels -- but jewels just far enough away that their outlines are less
than crystalline. I don't doubt that this is exactly the story he wanted
it to be. And perhaps he intended this uneasy confusion, too.
I do recommend reading This Census-Taker:
Mieville is one of our best writers, and his prose is a joy to grapple
with, even if that grappling feels like a knife-fight in the dark for
much of this book. Bring your A-game when you read This Census-Taker; that's my primary advice. You'll need all your wits about you for this one; I was clearly missing a few.
No comments:
Post a Comment