The great thing about history is that it never stops being history.
It might technically get older, but, realistically, a hundred years is
the same as a hundred and twenty. Old is old, dead is dead.
So
I can read the tenth anniversary edition of a book four years later
without feeling any guilt, because the guy it's about has been dead
since 1885 anyway. He's not doing anything new in the meantime.
I am, of course talking about Chester Brown's historical graphical comic-book thing Louis Riel,
one of the works that most deforms the common usage of the term
"graphic novel." (So I'm avoiding using it directly.) Brown himself is
one of those quirky Canadian oddballs that comics seems to throw off
regularly -- not quite as monomaniacal and misogynistic as Dave Sim,
definitely further down the spectrum than
seems-to-mostly-just-be-eccentric Seth, and probably about equal with
world-class work-avoider Joe Matt -- with his own very defined passions
and crankish ideas that mostly stay out of this primarily fact-based
book. (Riel did claim to have direct knowledge of the divine, which
could easily have been one of the things that attracted Brown to his
story -- but that's material that was already there waiting for him. And
women are almost entirely absent from this story of 19th century
politics and war, whether because of Brown's views or because any
contributions they made were quiet at the time and ignored thereafter.)
I
can't speak from any personal knowledge of Riel's story, or any
previous scholarship. My sense is that Brown followed the generally
accepted scholarly consensus at the time, and that his telling is as
"true" as any book of history: it's what most experts think happened, in
broad outlines, even if some of them probably argue violently with each
other about individual details. And that is the old sad story of
distant elites of one ethnicity scheming to disenfranchise (or worse) a
minority they don't like within a burgeoning territory they control.
In
this case, it's the English-descended government of Canada, mostly in
the person of Prime Minister Sir John A. Macdonald, planning how best to
cut up and use a vast section of the mid-continent prairies and
deliberately alienating, damaging, and snubbing the locals, particularly
the population of mixed French-native background called Metis. (That
area eventually became the province of Manitoba, if that helps place it
in space and time.)
The Metis people were not happy
with this, of course. "No taxation without representation" is only one
specific expression of an age-old problem: those people over there, with all the power and most of the guns, are telling us
to do things we don't think they should have any say in. The Metis
fought back, and Louis Riel is the man who became their leader -- it
seems, from Brown's telling, that was because he was right there when
the first clash happened on Metis land, and because he spoke English
well enough to be a go-between. And he was strong-willed and charismatic to stay in that role. Brown presents him as the leader of his people, and doesn't get into any power struggles that might have happened within the Metis community, even as we suspect they must have happened.
Riel eventually led two
different rebellions against the government of Canada. As Brown tells
it, he was goaded and guided into doing so by Macdonald and others, who
knew they would win militarily and preferred the simplicity of bullets
to the messiness of actually doing their political jobs of compromising
and allowing all voices to be heard. It's a sad, sordid story, basically
a tragedy: Riel was unstable and mentally ill (that supposed direct
connection with the divine), which possibly kept him from finding a
better solution for his people. Or maybe they were doomed from the
beginning, since the other side had the government, the railroad, most
of the guns, more money, and their own racism to convince themselves
they were firmly in the right.
Brown tells the story
well, focusing on Riel's life and actions and using a clean six-panel
grid -- he gets out of the way of his story almost entirely. This looks
like a Chester Brown story, since his art is distinctive, but it reads
like compelling reality, without the surrealistic breaks and
self-obsessions of his earlier works. There's a reason this has become a
Canadian classic; it tells an important story well. This edition
includes an extensive collection of sources and notes, plus a section at
the back with sketches, original comics covers and other related stuff.
To maximize the scholarly heft, there's an essay by an academic to close
the whole thing out. But most readers won't bother with that anyway. The book itself is enough: it tells a story we've seen many times before, but need to be reminded of regularly.
No comments:
Post a Comment