Thursday, April 30, 2009

Free Green Lantern!

And many others as well. In case you didn't know, this coming Saturday -- May 2nd -- is the annual Free Comic Book Day across North America.

All you have to do is walk into a participating comics shop, say "My good man, do you have a FREE COMIC BOOK for me?" and walk out with five minutes of trashy disposable entertainment in a form most adults gave up on decades ago.

A list of the potential wonders that await you is here. You may search for the elusive "participating comics shop" via a search box on that self-same page.

Happy Free Comic Booking!

2009 Clarke Award Winner: Ian R. MacLeod

Last night, Ian R. MacLeod's novel Song of Time won the 2009 Arthur C. Clarke Award for best science fiction novel published in the UK.

I haven't read or seen it, so no reaction from me. But congratulations to MacLeod, and I hope this helps get the book published on this side of the pond.

Locus Awards Finalists

Locus, the newspaper of the SFF field, released earlier this week the list of finalists for their annual popularly-voted awards. As in past years, the winners are already known in the hallowed hall of Locus, since voting is over. But the rest of us will have to guess what those winners are, until the big ceremony during the Science Fiction Awards Weekend in Seattle in late June.

SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL
  • Matter, Iain M. Banks (Orbit UK)
  • City at the End of Time, Greg Bear (Gollancz, Del Rey)
  • Marsbound, Joe Haldeman (Ace)
  • Anathem, Neal Stephenson (Atlantic UK, Morrow)
  • Saturn's Children, Charles Stross (Orbit, Ace)
I've read Matter and Saturn's Children without loving either of them, and I've got Marsbound on the teetering to-be-read pile. I keep vaguely feeling like reading City at the End of Time, but then I look at how long it is and the feeling goes away. And I have no desire at all to look at Anathem, which means it will certainly win and be acclaimed the definitive SF novel of last year.

FANTASY NOVEL
  • The Shadow Year, Jeffrey Ford (Morrow)
  • Lavinia, Ursula K. Le Guin (Harcourt)
  • The Bell at Sealey Head, Patricia A. McKillip (Ace)
  • The Dragons of Babel, Michael Swanwick (Tor)
  • An Evil Guest, Gene Wolfe (Tor)
I've read Evil Guest and Dragons of Babel, both of which are decent books with serious flaws (the Swanwick is a fix-up and shows it; the Wolfe is another entry in his list of odd supposed-to-be-women). I want to read Sealey Head and Shadow Year. I haven't seriously wanted to touch a Le Guin book since she started preaching and stopped storytelling about twenty years ago -- so, again, I expect she'll win.

FIRST NOVEL
  • Thunderer, Felix Gilman (Bantam Spectra)
  • Black Ships, Jo Graham (Orbit US)
  • Pandemonium, Daryl Gregory (Ballantine Del Rey)
  • The Gone-Away World, Nick Harkaway (William Heinemann, Knopf)
  • Singularity's Ring, Paul Melko (Tor)
The only one I've read is the Melko, which was a solid first novel. The Gregory and Harkaway are still around somewhere, in case I have the time and desire. The Gilman looks like fun, but I've never picked it up in person to glance at the prose. And the Graham is a book I know very little about.

YOUNG-ADULT NOVEL
  • Little Brother, Cory Doctorow (Tor)
  • The Graveyard Book, Neil Gaiman (HarperCollins, Bloomsbury)
  • Tender Morsels, Margo Lanagan (Knopf)
  • Nation, Terry Pratchett (Doubleday UK, HarperCollins)
  • Zoe's Tale, John Scalzi (Tor)
I've read everything but the Lanagan -- which, again, is around somewhere. The Scalzi is not technically a Young-Adult book, but that's splitting a very fine hair. Nation is very Pratchetty, in all the usual good and bad ways. (Ditto Little Brother wrt Doctorowianness.) I'd probably lean towards the Gaiman book myself, but, since the Lanagan is something that I'd have to force myself to read, I expect it will win. (I'm being extraordinarily pessimistic this year; it helps to simplify things.)

NOVELLA
  • "The Erdmann Nexus", Nancy Kress (Asimov’s 10-11/08)
  • "Pretty Monsters", Kelly Link (Pretty Monsters)
  • "The Tear", Ian McDonald (Galactic Empires)
  • Once Upon a Time in the North, Philip Pullman (Knopf)
  • "True Names", Benjamin Rosenbaum & Cory Doctorow (Fast Forward 2)
Haven't read a one of them. I'll root for the McDonald story, for old times' sake.

NOVELETTE

  • "Pump Six", Paolo Bacigalupi (Pump Six and Other Stories)
  • "The Ice War", Stephen Baxter (Asimov’s 9/08)
  • "Shoggoths in Bloom", Elizabeth Bear (Asimov’s 3/08)
  • "The Things that Make Me Weak and Strange Get Engineered Away", Cory Doctorow (Tor.com 8/08)
  • "Pride and Prometheus", John Kessel (F&SF 1/08)
Ditto on not reading short fiction, and I have no useful opinion on this category.

SHORT STORY
  • "King Pelles the Sure", Peter S. Beagle (Strange Roads)
  • "Boojum", Elizabeth Bear & Sarah Monette (Fast Ships, Black Sails)
  • "Exhalation", Ted Chiang (Eclipse Two)
  • "The Kindness of Strangers", Nancy Kress (Fast Forward 2)
  • "After the Coup", John Scalzi (Tor.com 7/08)
And I plead ignorance for the third time.

MAGAZINE
  • Analog
  • Asimov's
  • F&SF
  • Realms of Fantasy
  • Subterranean
Wow! There are still magazines being published! I'm very out of touch with short fiction, so I can't say any more than that.

PUBLISHER
  • Ace
  • Baen
  • Night Shade Books
  • Subterranean Press
  • Tor
I have no idea how anyone determines their vote in this category -- publisher that had the most books I personally liked? publisher that did the fewest books I loathed? publisher who gave me the biggest advance? Tor wins this every year anyway.

ANTHOLOGY
  • The Year's Best Fantasy and Horror 2008: 21st Annual Collection, Ellen Datlow, Kelly Link & Gavin Grant, eds. (St. Martin's Griffin)
  • Galactic Empires, Gardner Dozois, ed. (SFBC)
  • The Year's Best Science Fiction: Twenty-Fifth Annual Collection, Gardner Dozois, ed. St. Martin's)
  • Eclipse Two, Jonathan Strahan, ed. (Night Shade Books)
  • The Starry Rift, Jonathan Strahan, ed. (Viking)
I've read none of these, and am vaguely rooting for Starry Rift for Alma Mater reasons. I do think any category that mixes original and reprint anthologies is confusing and weird -- they're very different things -- but Locus never asked my opinion on the matter. I suspect Eclipse Two will win.

COLLECTION
  • Pump Six and Other Stories, Paolo Bacigalupi (Night Shade Books)
  • The Drowned Life, Jeffrey Ford (HarperPerennial)
  • Pretty Monsters, Kelly Link (Viking)
  • The Best of Lucius Shepard, Lucius Shepard (Subterranean Press)
  • The Best of Michael Swanwick, Michael Swanwick (Subterranean Press)
Haven't read any; have or want to read most of them. (Though I've read nearly all of the stories in the Swanwick and probably half of the Shepard.) I'd normally think Link would win, but Pretty Monsters is a mix-and-match collection of mostly stories from her two previous collections, aimed at a YA market. So I'm unsure.

EDITOR
  • Ellen Datlow
  • Gardner Dozois
  • David G. Hartwell
  • Jonathan Strahan
  • Gordon Van Gelder
All very respectable names, whom I'm all at least moderately friendly with, so I'll maintain a dignified, self-preserving silence.

ARTIST
  • Bob Eggleton
  • John Picacio
  • Shaun Tan
  • Charles Vess
  • Michael Whelan
I'm a bit out of the loop these days, so I might have missed a flood of new Whelan art in the genre...but I doubt it. Folks, he stopped working regularly on SFF art a good decade ago, and you really need to let go. (He does do a cover or two a year, but that's about it.) SF people are remarkably conservative for whiz-bang sensawunda folks.

NON-FICTION/ART BOOK
  • Spectrum 15: The Best in Contemporary Fantastic Art, Cathy Fenner & Arnie Fenner, eds. (Underwood Books)
  • What It Is We Do When We Read Science Fiction, Paul Kincaid (Beccon)
  • Rhetorics of Fantasy, Farah Mendlesohn (Wesleyan University Press)
  • Coraline: The Graphic Novel, Neil Gaiman, adapted and illustrated by P. Craig Russell (HarperCollins)
  • Tales From Outer Suburbia, Shaun Tan (Allen & Unwin; Scholastic '09)
I've read the three of these with the fewest words, which is sadly typical of me. I want to read the other two, but somehow doubt I ever will. I suspect the Mendelsohn will win; it sounds like a really interesting book that crystallized a lot of vague thinking about fantasy. (That is, it will win if the vast Gaiman-loving audience doesn't just vote in Coraline out of habit.)

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

All These Major Bummers Are Making Me...Tense!

Today at ComicMix, I did my best to over-intellectualize a bunch of '80s humor comics by Keith Giffen and Robert Loren Fleming. Please join me there for a look at Showcase Presents Ambush Bug.

A Question for BEA Attendees

Book Expo America is back in New York this year, so I'll be there for at least one day. Unfortunately, I'm going to be off at a conference -- the annual meeting of NACVA in Boston -- through that Friday, so there's no chance that I'll make it to BEA on Friday.

But here's my question: is Saturday a substantially better day to be at BEA than Sunday?

I'd have to dismantle the booth Friday at 4, and then drive home to Jersey that evening -- after spending a long day selling books to accountants -- to make it on Saturday. But if Sunday is a dead zone with hardly anyone around and only picked-over remnants of giveaways, I'll make the effort to be there on a day when I can see people.

So, any of you who have attended BEAs (especially in New York) -- what's Sunday like, compared to Saturday?

Have You Seen This Design Before?

I suspect my usual audience won't have a clue about this, but it's been bugging me for more than a month now, so I'm throwing it open to the world.

This book right here -- called Ordinary Greatness, a great upcoming book about leadership skills from the finest book publisher ever to be headquartered in Hoboken -- has a cover that keeps distracting me. I'm sure that there's some other item, probably some kind of business book in the last ten or twenty years, that had a yellow cover with a sun motif and red accents, but countless wasted hours of searching have turned up nothing.

So, I ask you: does this book remind you of something? If so, what? Please help me scratch this annoying mental itch, if you can.

(Don't get me wrong -- I like this cover a lot. It just keeps reminding me of something...and I can't remember just what that "something" is.)

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Faking Amazon Reviews

Neth Space linked to a fine piece of fan harrumphing (from a blog called Best Fantasy Books) on the subject of Amazon reviews late yesterday. BFB is shocked and appalled at his discovery that some authors and publishers actively try to encourage (or even write) positive reviews of their own books on Amazon, and so rambled on in the paranoid mode for a thousand or so words about this deadly scourge.

I thought the outrage was ridiculously overstated for the tiny complaint -- there are so many reasons that quick reviews by random amateurs might not be entirely reliable as a guide to one's own tastes -- and so I commented over at Neth's place, thusly:
Well, he's half-right: publishers and authors do sometimes write reviews of their own books on Amazon, and even more often ask their family and friends to review their books. But the idea that there's "big money" in this is ludicrous.

Amazon's search algorithm is affected by reviews, yes -- but it's also affected by tags, and the behavior of customers (what books they click on, what books they buy), and, most of all, by sales ranking. So it's not possible to do that much SEO through good reviews alone.

I won't say that no publisher has ever spent money to pay an outside company (or their own staff) to sit around writing Amazon reviews -- the world has an endless supply of really stupid people -- but that's a ridiculously expensive way of accomplishing not very much. For all but a few very bestselling books -- which are already selling very well everywhere else, too -- the velocity of sales at Amazon is not and will not be at a level to pay for those activities.

So: yes, authors in particular do try to game Amazon. It doesn't work as well as they think it does. And any particular reader might well find that a random Amazon review does not closely match her taste and preference in books. But anyone who's surprised and outraged that a self-publisher is a huge self-promoter probably is also shocked every morning to see that the sky is blue.

The Yggyssey by Daniel Pinkwater

Daniel Pinkwater's new book The Yggyssey is a loose sequel to his previous novel The Neddiad, and it's another lightly-plotted Pinkwaterian ramble through 1950s Los Angeles and contiguous alternate worlds. It's not one of his best books, but it is another book that only Pinkwater could have written, which is something. It's probably of most interest to middle-aged long-time Pinkwater fans such as myself; I'm unsure how actual current "young adults" will react to it.

I described The Neddiad as "a standard Pinkwater book: a young hero (we're not told that he's fat...but, then again, we're not told that he isn't, either) travels to interesting places, meets odd people who teach him new and exciting things, and saves the world in a quirky way without there having been a heck of a lot of tension along the way." Yggyssey is very similar; only the pronoun needs to be changed. The young person telling this particular story is Yggdrasil (Iggy) Birnbaum, who had a supporting role in Neddiad and the starring part in this book. She lives in the Hermione residential hotel in Hollywood in the '50s -- with her father, aged ex-cowboy movie star Captain Buffalo Birnbaum, and her younger and barely-mentioned mother -- where she's about equally amused and bothered by the large number of ghosts resident in the hotel.

Her friends are Neddie Wenthworthstein and Seamus Finn, the hero of the previous book and a boy who might just get a book of his own next. Those two boys and the other characters are a bit thin here; Iggy's voice is clear and distinctive, but everyone else comes across as a collection of quirky behavior without much center. The boys get dragged along first on Iggy's investigations of why so many of the ghosts from the Hermione have been disappearing, and then with her on a journey to Old New Hackensack, a city in an alternate world where the ghosts have gone for the Old New Supernatural Days festival. (As the subtitle explains: "How Iggy Wondered What Happened to All of the Ghosts, Found Out Where They Went, and Went There.")

Along the way, they have a series of adventures, in a minor picaresque manner, and eventually overthrow the not-all-that-evil overlord of the alternate world, who turns out to have an unexpected connection to Iggy. It's all pleasant and Pinkwaterianly oddball, but there isn't much purpose to it; these are just some things that Iggy and her friends did over the course of a couple of weeks rather than something with the shape of a real novel.

I'd called The Yggyssey "young adult" above, but it isn't, actually -- and, as I think about his work, Pinkwater rarely if ever really writes for what we now call the young adult audience. (Even his sublime Young Adult Novel is about middle-schoolers, for example.) Pinkwater's characters and audience are smart older kids: they haven't hit puberty yet, so they're still at the age when their obsessions and interests -- old movies, ghosts, shamanism, reading, dada, whatever -- define them, rather than their relationships with the alluring sex. He does write real novels -- even if The Iggyssey is a slight disappointment on that front -- but he writes them for tweens rather than teens. Pinkwater's last two books have not been his best, for whatever reason -- but the novel just before that, The Education of Robert Nifkin, is one of his best, so I'd recommend new Pinkwater readers to look for that book, or for one of the omnibuses of his best earlier novels, 5 Novels, and 4 Fantastic Novels.

Monday, April 27, 2009

Tiptree Award Winners

This year the Tiptree judges (chair Gavin J. Grant, K. Tempest Bradford, Leslie Howle, Roz Kaveney, and Catherynne M. Valente) tied -- or deadlocked, or something -- in any case, they decided the award would go to two books instead of one this year. (The award web site quotes Grant and Bradford praising the Ness book, and Howle and Valente similarly exuberant about the Shawl, if that means anything.)

Those books are:
  • The Knife of Never Letting Go by Patrick Ness (Walker)
  • Filter House by Nisi Shawl (Aqueduct)
The Tiptree judges additionally listed thirteen other things they liked somewhat, though not enough to give an award to. (Their process still strikes me as backward, and their "shortlist" too long, but it's not my award -- and I suppose this process minimized hurt feelings.)

The actual awards will be given at the upcoming WisCon and include $1000, "artwork" created by someone unspecified based on the winning work, and an unspecified quantity of chocolate of unspecified quality. (I mention the latter only because the SFnal world has seen near-duels over questions of particular chocolate brands.)

[via Locus]

The True Meaning of SmekDay by Adam Rex

The True Meaning of SmekDay was published as a book for younger readers, but without an explicit age range on the book (because, as we know from the UK, age-banding is an evil thing that will only lead to misery and the cataclysmic death of all life on Earth). But, since the main character, Gratuity Tucci, is twelve years old, one can apply the old rule of kids' books -- that kids will generally refuse to read about kids younger than they are -- and estimate that it's primarily for 9-13 year olds.

SmekDay is the first novel by Adam Rex, who was best-known before this for his sly and humorous poetic picture book Frankenstein Makes a Sandwich. It has rather more illustrations than adult readers would expect -- one every five pages or so, including "photos," comics, and other things.

SmekDay starts off as an essay that Gratuity writes for school in the eighth grade (just a few years from now) as part of a contest for a time capsule -- all of the kids in the US, presumably, are writing about what this new holiday means to them.

You see, on what used to be Christmas Day in 2012, an alien race called the Boov invaded Earth and took over. They weren't overly hostile -- they seemed a bit goofy and not entirely competent -- but their technology so far overmatched human abilities that, as they say, Resistance Was Futile. Six months later, after trying to live among humans -- mostly by kicking people out of their homes and moving Boov in -- they decided to relocate all humans to reservations and keep most of the planet for themselves. All Americans were to move to Florida on one June day, aided by Boovish rocketpods.

But Gratuity's mother had disappeared just before the invasion, after claiming to have been abducted by aliens to teach them language and to fold clothes a few months before. So Gratuity was alone, and didn't want to take any Boovish rocketpod -- she wanted to go on her own. So she drove her mother's car and took her cat, Pig, straight south from eastern Pennsylvania towards her new home in central Florida. She didn't get very far before the road ran out; the Boov had been disintegrating the highways. But she met a Boov named J.Lo who rebuilt her car and then came along with her. (He was in trouble with his people, for a reason we don't find out until later.)

So Gratuity and Pig and J.Lo get to Florida and find trouble there, and have to move on to another human reservation. Along the way, they learn that another, much nastier race of aliens (the Gorg) is on their way. And the Boov shift, in the minds of the readers and Gratuity's view, from being clueless but obnoxious conquerors to something like allies, as those Gorg get closer and closer and finally arrive. According to J.Lo, the Gorg will drive the Boov away, then enslave some lucky humans and eat all the rest (and much of their planet). In the end, though, Gratuity helps to make a freer, happier world -- and finds her mother along the way.

That all sounds very serious, but SmekDay is a deeply funny book -- the Boov are buffoonish conquerors, though still dangerous (and the Gorg are not funny at all). Not a page passes without a laugh, or at least a smile. Boovish diction and biology -- they have seven sexes, including boygirls, girlboys, and boyboyboyboys -- are particularly amusing. For a while, the Boov invasion looks like a looming metaphor, but that's not Rex's intention at all -- he's telling a story that can go from farce to serious on a dime, but he's aiming for a more universal type of "serious," and he lets his subtext stay subtext.

SmekDay moves quickly, is incredibly entertaining, and has a subtly cynical view of human (and alien) nature that will endear it to smarter readers everywhere, no matter what their ages are. It's also an excellent contemporary SF novel for younger readers, and I know many folks have been beating the bushes for those. It's a wonderful book, and I hope Rex writes many more novels like it.

Reviewing the Mail: Week of 4/25

And so it's Monday morning again, which means it's time for me to post the list of books that I got for review last week. As always, I do this to backstop the books that I won't manage to review -- though I'd generally like to read everything -- and make sure everything gets some notice and attention.

This time, there was only a small trickle in the mail, so I'm also including two books that I bought myself. As it happens, everything is comics this time, and all but one book are manga of one kind or another -- starting with the biggest and most exciting book of the week, one I spent my own money on and wished I'd found in a store sometime before:
A Drifting Life is the gigantic memoir in comics form of Yoshihiro Tatsumi, covering his life from the end of WW II to 1960 and taking him from a boy to one of the driving forces behind the gegika movement in Japanese comics. Drifting Life took Tatsumi more than a decade to write and draw; it's the acknowledged masterpiece of the creator whose earlier stories have been collected in the searing, compelling collections The Push Man, Good-Bye, and Abandon the Old in Tokyo. (It's such a major event in manga that even the New York Times took notice of it recently.) Drawn & Quarterly published A Drifting Life earlier this month as a trade paperback; I expect it will be the gigantic squarebound comic of the year the way Bottomless Belly Button was of 2008.

Tor/Seven Seas is publishing the third volume of the manga series Hayate X Blade this week; I reviewed the first book last year for ComicMix. The publisher describes it as "high-octane swordplay meets light yuri romance," which is pretty accurate -- the fighting was secondary in the first volume to introducing as many characters as possible, but the series was clearly organized around pretty girls hitting each other with swords. And the "yuri" part, for those of you not up on your manga sub-categories, is the female equivalent of "yaoi" -- same-sex romances, in this case generally chaste (and, in the first book, most repressed to the level of often-humorous subtext). I find it interesting that Japanese gay jokes seem mostly to be on the "OK, I'll act gay if I have to" level rather than the more common US "I'm not gay! Perish the thought!" style, but I'm not sure what it means -- if anything.

The best title of the week is clearly Maid War Chronicle, Vol. 1, which begins a fantasy series in which a young price escapes the invasion of his country and heads out to begin his insurgency...aided only by the six palace maids who escaped with him. Come to think of it, that's probably the best plot of the week, as well. This will be published by Del Rey Manga tomorrow, and it's by the manga-ka known as RAN, who did the art on Mao-chan (written by the nearly ubiquitous Ken Akamatsu, and reviewed by yours truly once upon a time).

Also from Del Rey Manga this month is a book with a more conventional (or well-trafficked) premise: Orange Planet, in which the main character is young Rui, a girl whose worst problem is that too many boys are in love with her. From a quick glance though, this looks very, very shojo, with huge eyes brimming with emotion, shirtless boys, and all manner of school activities leading to emotional confrontations. It's by Haruka Fukushima, whom Del Rey helpfully notes also did the manga Instant Teen and Cherry Juice.

The first time around, I had to admit that I just didn't get The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya; the word "melancholy" didn't seem to have anything to do with the manic, delusional main character, and it looked like something that was supposed to be extremely funny...and it wasn't. Well, the second volume has come around -- it was published by Yen Press in March -- and I might just have to take a second look at this thing and see if it makes any more sense to me this time around. (By the way, this is one of those complicated Japanese media entities that started as a series of light novels, turned into an anime show, and probably had substantial storylines running on lunchboxes, lipstick containers, and ramen noodle cups before finally becoming a manga, and the credits are equally complicated: Art by Gaku Tsugano, Story by Nagaru Tanigawa, Characters by Noizi Ito -- in that order.)

And last for this week is the other book I bought for myself: B.P.R.D.: The Warning, tenth in that series and the latest story in the extended Hellboy universe. This one is written by Mike Mignola and John Arcudi, with art by Guy Davis -- the usual, great B.P.R.D. team -- and it comes back to the modern day (after the flashback of the last storyline, 1946) to pick up right after the end of the previous volume, Killing Ground. Dark Horse published it earlier this month, and I wouldn't start reading this series here, by any means -- but the Hellboy and B.P.R.D. stories are great horror-tinged adventure tales with atmosphere and style to burn; they're wonderful and spooky and gripping.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Saturday Is Bond Day #8: Live and Let Die

This week, the hope was to move the standard movie time to Friday evening -- since it's now generally nice and warm and sunny on Saturday afternoons, so spending them indoors in a darkened room isn't the best idea -- but Thing 2's baseball game put the kibosh on that. And then we spent all day Saturday in NYC, hitting the Central Park Zoo (which the boys thought was fun, but were slightly disappointed in the way it differed from Madagascar), wandering through the park, and eventually having a late lunch at Patsy's (hat tip to Colleen Lindsay for introducing me to Patsy's through their Village outpost, so I was able to promise two food-shy and hungry boys that they'd really like the pizza...and they did).

So Bond Day shifted to Sunday -- Sunday evening, in fact. And The Wife made a rare guest appearance as well, sitting in and telling Thing 1 every few minutes not to repeat just about every single line of dialogue from that stereotyped redneck sheriff.

When you talk about Live and Let Die, you'll inevitably talk about stereotypes -- not just that very broad good ol' boy, but the voodoo-tinged black villains. (They are genuinely threatening, not played for laughs, so they stay awfully '70s and blaxploitation-influenced, but don't fatally harm the movie.) Yaphet Kotto has a dual role (for about the first half) as the two main villians: the Harlem drug lord "Mr. Big," and Kananga, minister of something-or-other for a fictional Caribbean island. He has several major henchmen, at least two of which -- Geoffrey Holder as Baron Samedi and Julius Harris as Tee Hee -- have real menace. But there are so many named henchmen, so many would-be Oddjobs, that the film can palm one to hold in reserve -- if the viewer hasn't been paying close attention.

Live and Let Die was a retrenchment film -- it's the first movie with Roger Moore as Bond, and at the time, there must have been a question about whether he'd continue or pull a Lazenby and disappear after one movie. And Diamonds Are Forever was studiedly over-the-top (in a slightly lower-budget-looking way than the best of the Connery Bonds) in a way that Live and Let Die extends but deals with more naturally -- it fits the Moore Bond much better than Connery's.

And so there's a series of set-pieces that feels like a Bond "Greatest Hits" package -- fight in a train sleeping car from From Russia With Love, a speedboat race/fight also from Russia, sharks from Thunderball, Quarrel (Junior) from Dr. No, and so on. On the other side, since the most successful Bond movie -- Goldfinger -- was set largely in the US, both this and Diamonds were set primarily in the States, and this time in very unlikely bits of it for Bond -- rural Louisiana and Harlem.

I'm generally a Connery partisan, but, watching these movies in order, I have to admit that Moore here looks better than Connery did in Diamonds. He's not the same Bond -- he doesn't have the physicality that Connery did, for the biggest and most damaging difference -- but he wants to be Bond in a way that Connery didn't in his last movie, and he's given material that he can work with. (Including Jane Seymour as the obligatory girl, Solitaire.)

Live and Let Die has, hands down, the best title song -- though it does say something about the Bond series that the most rocking song they managed was from Paul McCartney -- a plot that generally makes sense, a villain who's nasty enough without wringing his hands, and an excellent Bond girl. It's not the best in the series -- it's not even one of the top two Moore Bonds -- but it steadied the ship when that was needed and is a nice thick slice of early-70s action cinema.

Genre Bestsellers of 2008

Once again -- I did this exercise last year in this space, and have the vague feeling that I did it before then somewhere else (maybe rec.arts.sf.written) without being able to actually trace earlier iterations -- here are the genre books that made Publishers Weekly's round-up of the best-selling books of 2008. (From the March 23rd issue; I'm running a month late this year.) As always, I think it's important to be clear-eyed about what people are actually buying, reading, and enjoying, and lists like this help that.

I try to be expansive in my definition of "genre" when putting these lists together, including paranormal romances, mainstream alternate histories, and other books that I know have fantastic elements. However, I don't know what every single book is, so I've almost certainly left out something that sold very well and had some genre element in it.

There will probably be some commentary, but I'll try to keep that to a minimum, since this will already be a series of very long lists.

Adult Hardcovers
The very top-selling fiction book, according to PW, was John Grisham's The Appeal, whose numbers are secret. (But it's somewhere north of #2, The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski, at 1,320,000.) Genre titles start with
  • #3 The Host, Stephenie Meyer, 1,240,005
  • #9 Your Heart Belongs to Me, Dean Koontz, 784,645
  • #20 Just After Sunset, Stephen King, 565,000
PW stops counting after #30, but they keep listing.
  • Strangers in Death, J.D. Robb, 403,000
  • Odd Hours, Dean Koontz, 401,522
  • Salvation in Death, J.D. Robb, 378,500
  • A Lion Among Men, Gregory Maguire, 377,458
  • Acheron, Sherrilyn Kenyon, 232,027
  • Blood Noir, Laurell K. Hamilton, 216,121 -- the first book published in-genre
  • Dark Curse, Christine Feehan, 172,258
  • Swallowing Darkness, Laurell K. Hamilton, 167,958
  • Anathem, Neal Stephenson, 157,215 -- the first genre SF novel on the list
  • From Dead to Worse, Charlaine Harris, 145,000
  • Small Favor, Jim Butcher, 124,188
  • Christ the Lord: The Road to Cana, Anne Rice, 112,000
  • The Outlaw Demon Wails, Kim Harrison, 108,528
  • Ender in Exile, Orson Scott Card, 107,792
  • The Gypsy Morph, Terry Brooks, 105,838
  • Star Wars: The Force Unleashed, Sean Williams, 103,232
  • Days of Infamy, Newt Gingrich and William R. Forstchen, 101,288
  • Star Wars: The Clone Wars by Karen Traviss, 101,146
  • Star Wars: Legacy of the Force: Invincible, Troy Denning, 101,034
  • The Widows of Eastwick, John Updike, 101,000
I didn't see anything on the hardcover non-fiction list of direct interest to the SF/Fantasy world. The top seller there was Randy Pausch's The Last Lecture, at 4,388,137.

Mass-Market Paperbacks
This list, and the trade paperback list that follows, incorporates both fiction and non-fiction, but I won't mention any of the latter.

Top book is John Grisham's The Appeal, at 2,185,722. (By comparison, the best-selling movie of the year, The Dark Knight, sold an estimated 22.37 million admissions -- roughly ten times as many. It's useful to remember this issue of magnitude when thinking about the book world: it's about a tenth as popular as movies.)
  • The Hollow, Nora Roberts, 1,912,349
  • The Pagan Stone, Nora Roberts, 1,838,137
  • The Darkest Evening of the Year, Dean Koontz, 1,060,474
  • The Good Guy, Dean Koontz, 940,235
  • Creation in Death, J.D. Robb, 828,045
  • Dream Chase, Sherrilyn Kenyon, 750,000
  • Strangers in Death, J.D. Robb, 735,321
  • Three in Death, J.D. Robb, 636,422
  • Devil May Cry, Sherrilyn Kenyon, 520,000
  • One Silent Night, Sherrilyn Kenyon, 510,000
  • Dead Until Dark, Charlaine Harris, 502,456 -- first genre title
  • Turbulent Sea, Christine Feehan, 500,059
  • Heart-Shaped Box, Joe Hill, 500,000
Trade Paperbacks
Top seller here is Eckhart Tolle's A New Earth, at 5,298,355. Note that this is twice the highest-selling mass-market book and well above even The Last Lecture. Trade paperbacks are clearly the dominant format at the moment in the US market, at least on the top end.
  • Duma Key, Stephen King, 871,000
  • The Road, Cormac McCarthy, 750,467
  • Marked, P.C. Cast, 400,000
  • Untamed, P.C. Cast, 330,000
  • Chosen, P.C. Cast, 315,000
  • Betrayed, P.C. Cast, 300,000
  • The Children of Hurin, J.R.R. Tolkien, 191,435
  • The Lovely Bones, Alice Sebold, 184,923
  • Halo, Tobias S. Buckell, 176,435
  • The Yiddish Policemen's Union, Michael Chabon, 150,000
  • Bakugan Battle Brawlers, no author listed, 140,124
  • World War Z, Max Brooks, 106,305
New Children's Hardcover
The kid's side is a much more backlist-driven business (think of all those copies sold of Winnie-the-Pooh and Where The Wild Things Are and Dr. Seuss every year), so it's broken down into more sub-sections. Genre books make very strong showings here; much more so than on the adult lists. First is frontlist hardcovers:
  • #1 Breaking Dawn, Stephenie Meyer, 6,051,981
  • #2 The Tales of Beedle the Bard, J.K. Rowling, 3,577,183
  • #3 Brisingr, Christopher Paolini, 2,604,642
  • #6 The Battle of the Labyrinth, Rick Riordan, 1,000,000
  • #11 The Final Warning, James Patterson, 519,444
  • #12 The Dangerous Days of Daniel X, James Patterson, 517,918
  • #14 Artemis Fowl: The Time Paradox, Eoin Colfer, 406,687
  • #15 Eclipse (Special Edition), Stephenie Meyer, 345,669
  • #16 The 39 Clues 1: The Maze of Bones, Rick Riordan, 321,054
  • #20 The 39 Clues 2: One False Note, Gordon Korman, 255,832
  • #21 Dark Day in the Deep Sea, Mary Pope Osborne, 254,699
  • #23 Inkdeath, Cornelia Funke, 254,176
  • #24 Eve of the Emperor Penguin, Mary Pope Osborne, 225,765
  • #30 Wall-E, no author listed, 184,813
  • #33 Warriors: Power of Three #3: Outcast, Erin Hunter, 159,893
  • #34 Seekers #1: The Quest Begins, Erin Hunter, 159,893
  • #37 Septimus Heap 4: Queste, Angie Sage, 155,002
  • #39 The Hunger Games, Suzanne Collins, 150,873
  • #45 Warriors: Power of Three #4: Eclipse, Erin Hunter, 136,949
  • #48 Warriors: Power of Three #5: Long Shadows, Erin Hunter, 132,938
  • #53 A Giant Problem, Holly Black, 128,872
  • #59 The Graveyard Book, Neil Gaiman, 122,559
  • #61 Twilight (Collector's Edition), Stephenie Meyer, 120,435
  • #62 The Nixie's Song, Holly Black, 115,953
  • #66 Warriors: Cats of the Clans, Erin Hunter, 109,918
  • #68 The Magician, Michael Scott, 107,522
  • #71 The Diamond of Darkhold, Jeanne DuPrau, 105,142
  • #74 Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (Anniversary Edition), J.K. Rowling, 103,450
Backlist Children's Hardcover
  • #1 Eclipse, Stephenie Meyer, 4,525,238
  • #2 New Moon, Stephenie Meyer, 1,430,167
  • #4 Twilight, Stephenie Meyer, 1,138,588
  • #79 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, J.K. Rowling, 113,376
  • #94 Eldest, Christopher Paolini, 102,882
  • #96 Eragon, Christopher Paolini, 100,744
New Children's Paperback
  • #1 New Moon, Stephenie Meyer, 5,309,229
  • #2 Twilight (mass market), Stephenie Meyer, 1,872, 408
  • #3 Twilight (media tie-in edition), Stephenie Meyer, 982,034
  • #4 Saving the World and Other Extreme Sports, James Patterson, 799,631
  • #8 Twilight: the Complete Illustrated Movie Companion, Mark Cotta Vaz, 442,361
  • #12 Prince Caspian (movie tie-in edition), C.S. Lewis, 364,864
  • #13 The Titan's Curse, Rick Riordan, 341,192
  • #35 Star Wars: The Clone Wars, Tracey West, 190,700
  • #36 Inheritance Cycle Omnibus: Eregon and Eldest, Christopher Paolini, 188,613
  • #37 Star Wars: The Clone Wars: Battle at Teth, Kirsten Mayer, 186,282
  • #39 Revenge of the Living Dummy, R.L. Stine, 184,669
  • #47 Creep from the Deep, R.L. Stine, 165,933
  • #50 Dragon of the Dawn, Mary Pope Osborne, 157,695
  • #55 Star Wars: The Clone Wars: The New Padawan, Eric Stevens, 152,661
  • #67 The Scream of the Haunted Mast, R.L. Stine, 135,016
  • #77 The Lost Colony, Eoin Colfer, 123,943
  • #80 Warriors: Power of Three #1: The Sight, Erin Hunter, 121,389
  • #83 Star Wars: The Clone Wars: Intergalactic Adventure: Activity Book, no author listed, 119,621
  • #85 Night World #1, L.J. Smith, 116,488
  • #87 Shadow Kiss, Richelle Mead, 116,125
  • #88 The Alchemyst, Michael Scott, 115,422
  • #94 Warriors Super Edition: Firestar's Quest, Erin Hunter, 112,755
  • #105 Warriors: Tigerstar and Sasha #1: Into the Woods, Erin Hunter, 108,186
  • #117 Star Wars Fandex, Christopher Cerasi, 103,191
  • #120 Septimus Heap 3: Physik, Angie Sage, 101,837
  • #126 Frostbite, Richelle Mead, 100,476
On this list, I left off a lot of movie tie-in books that I suspect are 4x4s or other less text-heavy formats. But there are several dozen more vaguely SFnal or fantastic books based on media properties here.

Backlist Children's Paperback
  • #1 Twilight, Stephenie Meyer, 5,698,941
  • #2 The Tale of Desperaux, Kate DiCamillo, 507,054
  • #3 The Lightning Thief, Rick Riordan, 503,372
  • #5 Dinosaurs Before Dark, Mary Pope Osborne, 396,008
  • #6 Prince Caspian, C.S. Lewis, 393,405
  • #7 Eldest, Christopher Paolini, 369,546
  • #9 The City of Ember, Jeanne Du Prau, 349,038
  • #11 The Sea of Monsters, Rick Riordan, 336,895
  • #15 The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, C.S. Lewis, 311,413
  • #22 Eragon, Christopher Paolini, 289,521
  • #23 Mummies in the Morning, Mary Pope Osborne, 265,730
  • #25 The Night at Dawn, Mary Pope Osborne, 261,812
  • #26 Pirates Past Noon, Mary Pope Osborne,256,431
  • #29 The Magician's Nephew, C.S. Lewis, 247,034
  • #37 A Wrinkle in Time, Madeleine L'Engle, 223,625
  • #41 The Horse and His Boy, C.S. Lewis, 206,672
  • #44 Night of the Ninjas, Mary Pope Osborne,201,150
  • #45 The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, C.S. Lewis, 197,407
  • #48 The Silver Chair, C.S. Lewis, 190,467
  • #50 The Last Battle, C.S. Lewis, 189,101
  • #56 Afternoon on the Amazon, Mary Pope Osborne, 177,542
  • #57 Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, J.K. Rowling, 177,133
  • #60 Midnight on the Moon, Mary Pope Osborne, 176,363
  • #61 Dolphins at Daybreak, Mary Pope Osborne, 175,492
  • #66 Polar Bears Past Bedtime, Mary Pope Osborne, 171,942
  • #68 Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, J.K. Rowling, 171,680
  • #74 Blizzard of the Blue Moon, Mary Pope Osborne, 159,662
  • #77 Sunset of the Sabertooth, Mary Pope Osborne, 158,020
  • #79 Ghost Town at Sundown, Mary Pope Osborne, 155,113
  • #82 Vacation Under the Volcano, Mary Pope Osborne, 151,813
  • #83 Warriors #1: Into the Wild, Erin Hunter, 150,637
If you noticed, Stephenie Meyer had the #1 book on all four children's lists, and it looks like every edition of everything she's written so far made it onto these lists. She's definitely one face of fantasy to today's audience...but don't forget Mary Pope Osborne (the "Magic Treehouse" series, all early chapter books for grade-schoolers) and Erin Hunter (the "Warriors" talking-cats books, for slightly older kids), who sell, in aggregate, nearly as many books as Meyer does.

One last note -- these lists purport to cover all books sold through bookstores in 2008, but there's one major blind spot: comics and manga. The trade paperback of Watchmen sold at least 300,000 copies last year, which would have put it solidly in the middle of that list. There may be other books in that area -- some volumes of Naruto, maybe -- that also sold enough copies to be included on the lists. So there may be other categories suppressed; it would be difficult to tell what those are unless you already know the sales of particular books.

2009 Nebula Winners

Last night, in a swanky ceremony somewhere in greater Los Angeles, the following awards were handed down with all appropriate pomp and fanfare:
  • Novel: Powers, Ursula K. Le Guin (Harcourt)
  • Novella: "The Spacetime Pool", Catherine Asaro (Analog Mar '08)
  • Novelette: "Pride and Prometheus", John Kessel (F&SF Jan '08)
  • Short Story: "Trophy Wives", Nina Kiriki Hoffman (Fellowship Fantastic)
  • Script: Wall-E, Andrew Stanton & Jim Reardon. Original story by Andrew Stanton & Pete Docter (Pixar)
  • Andre Norton Award: Flora's Dare, Ysabeau S. Wilce (Harcourt)
  • Damon Knight Grand Master: Harry Harrison
  • Author Emerita: M.J. Engh
  • Solstice Award: Kate Wilhelm, A.J. Budrys, and Martin Greenberg
  • Ray Bradbury Award: Joss Whedon
  • SFWA Service Award:Victoria Strauss
I haven't read Powers -- though the title always reminds me of the Brian Bendis revisionist-superheroes comic -- so I won't comment on that.

Ditto on the short fiction winners.

I believe this is the last time SFWA will have the Script category, which is not too soon for me, though WALL*E is a fine movie, albeit one whose script I would not be able to evaluate from seeing the film.

Flora's Dare, which I recently read, is a fine novel, and a lot of fun. Wilce now has 40% of the Norton Awards ever awarded.

I was once quite fond of Harrison's work, but I don't entirely think he's up to the level of the best previous winners of the Grand Master Award. (And renaming the award, though it was a well-meant gesture to the man who created SFWA out of whole cloth, makes it sound like the naming rights have been sold; the title is now too long, too unwieldy, and a bit silly-sounding.)

I've complained for several years about the kiss-slap of the "Author Emeritus" award, and I murmured again this time around for Engh. (Who, additionally, appears to have gotten it for writing one highly respected but little-read book in the '70s.)

And the Solstice Award is for writers who will never get the Grand Master, aren't important enough to be a single Emeritus, but SFWA wants to give some recognition to before they die. I don't believe the recipients consider that as much of a back-handed insult as I would; I clearly am more nasty-minded and pugnatious than the average aged SFWAn.

The Bradbury will take over for the Script category next year, as a voted award going to the media object SFWAs most wish they were writing for. This year, though, is an unvoted one-off going to a single individual for no obvious reason despite the fact that SFWA is desperately in love with him.

And the SFWA Service award is what it always is: the kind of award every organization gives to the people that keep it running.

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Wetlands by Charlotte Roche

This is a very smutty, deliberately offensive novel, translated from the German (where it was a bestseller). It's another one of those novels about a disaffected teenager -- in this case one obsessed with physicality, and with using the body to shock others.

What makes it different is that teenager is a girl -- teenager Helen Memel, in the hospital for an operation on an anal lesion. She's the first-person narrator, and she's one of those compulsive explainers and sharers -- the tenth-generation spawn of Holden Caulfield -- who just has to tell us everything about herself. (By the second page, she's not only talked about the lesion, but segued from that to a deep discussion of her hemorrhoids and the fact that "I've had very successful anal sex for many years -- from the age of fifteen up to now, at eighteen....")

All of the things she wants to tell us have to do with her body, particularly about the usually-untalked-about parts of her body. Helen is desperately trying to shock, with all of her talk about aggressively poor hygiene and ingestion of bodily wastes and marking of her territory in quite animalistic ways. Wetlands is, above everything else, a detailed look at several days in the life of the region between Helen Memel's legs. Smegma, ear wax, snot, and other bodily secretions do also get their shout-outs, but the focus remains in the vaginal-anal region.

If you read Wetlands, something will shock you -- that's its point. There isn't much else to Helen Memel besides the shocking; she's empty otherwise. There's a bit of psychobabble about her divorced parents, and a time when her mother may have tried to commit suicide (and kill Helen's younger brother along the way) when Helen was young. But, really, that's all an excuse for her behavior -- Roche put that in to have a reason to have Helen act out, rather than starting from Helen and moving out to her behavior.

I can't recommend Wetlands; at first, it's refreshing to find a female character this crudely and rudely physical -- she's starts to seem like a female version of the unwashed, drinking-till-he-vomits frat boy -- but she quickly becomes tedious in her thin obsessions and relentless, dull self-centeredness. It's always dangerous to extrapolate from character to author, particularly on a first book, so I won't engage in any of that. But I do hope Roche, if she writes another novel, tones down the self-indulgent first-person narration and works in a bit more story.

Friday, April 24, 2009

Hey, the SFBC Has a New Website Design!

And I was about to complement them on it -- it's clean and easily navigable, which is no small thing -- when I noticed that the SFBC has exactly the same design as all of its sister clubs. (At least two of which -- BOMC and Crossings -- are either down or have bad links.) So that's one big point for corporate consistency and minus about a dozen for losing the previous distinctive designs of the individual clubs.

Remember, corporate America: that impulse you have to dumb everything down and do it all on the same template? That's a bad impulse.

I Stood Stone-Like At Midnight, Suspended in My Masquerade

This week's "Manga Friday" column for ComicMix is Growin' Up, with an eclectic mix of books about teenagers doing various things -- things that they do best, but aren't pretty (Wolverine: Prodigal Son); going to art school (GA: Geijutsuka Art Design Class); and learning about love in rural Korea seventy or so years ago (The Color of Earth).

In other news, the number of books that I've read and not written about here is up to twelve. I've been a bad, bad Hornswoggler...

In other, other news, it looks like I'll be going to the special "Blogger's Night" of the Off-Broadway musical The Toxic Avenger. So look for the first Hornswoggler review of a major musical sometime late next week. (I hope.)

Movie Log: Living in Oblivion

Living in Oblivion is a funny movie about low-budget filmmaking which I saw a few weeks ago now, and don't remember a whole lot about at this point.

Well, that one character is clearly a satire of the young Brad Pitt. (He was just the plain old Brad Pitt when the movie was made, of course -- this was a dozen years ago.)

And the repeated "and then he/she woke up" either happened one too often or one too few times; if you're going to repeat something, the magic number is three. Two just looks sloppy.

Steve Buscemi plays the director of a low-budget movie filming somewhere vaguely downtown in Manhattan, and the rest of the cast is his cast and crew -- mostly not people I recognized, except for Catherine Keener as the female lead.

And the movie rambles on through several long scenes -- three sequences of scenes, actually -- all about the various problems that arise when you work with people like these on a movie like this. Everyone involved in the movie-within-a-movie is moderately competent (with the possible exception of James LeGros as the not-based-on-Brad-Pitt-at-all-oh-no Chad Palomino), but they're all also neurotic and dysfunctional, so there are always more problems.

I gather that this was most interesting to other indy filmmakers in the mid-90s, but it's still pretty funny, and only very slightly self-indulgent -- I was expecting that level to be much higher.

An Early Morning Thought

With all of the immediate reactions to everything being either "fail" or "win," the social web is like nothing so much as a zero-sum game.

Quote of the Week

A Pack of Parker:
"You know, she speaks eighteen languages. And she can't say 'no' in any of them"

"If all the young ladies who attended the Yale promenade were laid end to end, no one would be the least surprised."

"Tell him I've been too fucking busy -- or vice versa."
- to her editor, on her honeymoon

"I require only three things of a man. He must be handsome, ruthless and stupid."

"All I need is room enough to lay a hat and a few friends."

"This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it."

- all quotes from Dorothy Parker

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Tales from Other Hemispheres

Today for ComicMix, I reviewed three comics projects from the Philippines: Elmer, Trese, and Martial Law Babies. (No links for those; they're not generally available on this side of the Pacific, sadly.)

Suvudu Examines Eisner Nominees

Starting two days ago, the Random House SF web portal Suvudu is examining all of the nominees in all of the categories of the Will Eisner Comic Industry Awards. The first category they tackled was Best Cover Artist, with well-chosen art examples and some thoughtful commentary. (Full disclosure: I was one of the judges this year, and so far Kyle M. of Suvudu hasn't said anything along the lines of "the judges must have been on crack to have nominated {foo}," so I'm inclined to like him.)

It's not entirely clear how often these pieces will run -- there are twenty-six categories, but Suvudu's initial post about the series makes it sound like they'll be spaced out to run until the opening of Comic-Con in San Diego in late July. But I'll be looking forward to them, however often they appear.

But I will note, once again, the vagaries of taste: Kyle M. particularly likes Matt Wagner's Zorro covers, while I was practically jumping up and down in the judges' room, telling everyone else not to spend much time on those (which I thought were decent guy-in-heroic-pose work), but to pay attention to the magnificent design sense and dynamics of light on his Grendel covers. So even when people agree with each other about art, they disagree as to why they're agreeing.

Movie Log: Rachel Getting Married

Rachel Getting Married is not entirely a frame for Anne Hathaway's performance as Kym (the recovering-addict sister of the Rachel who's getting married), but it's darn close -- it's rare that there's a movie so much about one character that has the name of another character in the title.

Hathaway was Oscar-nominated for that role, for both good and obvious reasons -- it's a meaty part, with a lot of turbulent emotions and big speeches, and Hathaway does it well. Kym is one of those people who always has to be at the center of everything, and Hathaway balances the annoyance of that (won't this girl ever just shut up and get over herself?) and the raw neediness of it.

The background is slightly fuzzy at times -- some of that is deliberate (there's one important character from the past who is mentioned in passing once or twice early in the movie, and the big expected payoff is later), and some of it looks more like a result of director Jonathan Demme's improvisation-friendly style (Kym has been in rehab for about a decade, is still in her mid-20s, and was a professional model before that -- not impossible, but confusing).

Rachel Getting Married is another example of that old staple, the family drama: take someone who will say and do anything and dig up all of the old skeletons, and drop her into the middle of something important. In this case, it's Kym -- the trope works best when it's an estranged family member -- and the wedding, and the expected fireworks do follow. Rachel gets angry at Kym and with their father; Kym argues with her divorced mother; there's a big inappropriate speech by Kym at the rehearsal dinner, and so on.

Rachel doesn't quite come into focus; Demme lets his cameras linger too much on some scenes -- particularly the party shots -- as if he doesn't want to get back to his actual story. It could have used both a tighter script and a sharper cut in the editing room. But Hathaway is amazing, and she's surrounded by other actors doing good work as well. This is really a movie to see for acting rather than story, but it's definitely worth seeing.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Movie Log: The Spirit

I'm watching Frank Miller's The Spirit this evening, and, as I've done with other movies that can't be taken seriously, I'm going to type a few thoughts about it as I go along and just post when the movie ends. (Some things aren't worth spending any time thinking about afterward.)

It's as if Miller is daring the audience to notice his bizarre attitude towards women with that bizarre speech from SexyDeath...and Gabriel Macht's equally overheated narration.

So far, the only thing traceable back to Will Eisner are the names -- nothing else.

Miller likes cutting quickly between tight close-ups so that you can't tell what's happening, doesn't he? And it's really distracting when the two people talking are lit utterly differently and have very different diffusion filters on them.

This is another one of those movies that takes place in the middle of nowhere, with a couple of lunatics emoting at each other at random.

I'm glad to see that Sam Jackson's having fun. But if only The Spirit and The Octopus are nigh-invulnerable, how come the mook can get run over by a truck and still walk around?

Young Denny is distractingly familiar...oh! he's the kid from Hotel for Dogs! Now, that's a better movie than this one. More realistic, too.

I don't want to say that Macht can't act, since it's impossible to prove a negative. But I will say that he does a very good job of avoiding acting here.

Um, the Blood of Heracles?!? So far, I'd be hard-pressed to find five consecutive seconds of this movie that I could believe in.

She takes a photocopy of her butt? As part of a threatening conversation? Has Miller ever met a woman?

This entire movie takes place in a world ruled by the pathetic fallacy -- it must be nice when blinds lower themselves because you're snogging.

Since I haven't mentioned it yet, let me point out that the Spirit wears blue, not black.

Eisner's names always were really unbelievable, weren't they? Sand Sarif is almost as bad as Tooty Compote.

There are only two kinds of dialogue in this movie: the lines that explain the plot in tedious detail, and the lines that illustrate what an unpleasant place Miller's mind must be.

Dolan is about twenty years too young and looks like Harvey Bullock.

And another scene set in a coal scuttle lit by floodlights facing down from ten feet up.

This is not a movie that should be calling attention to things that are "plain damn weird."

ScarJo's glasses are cute. And she seems to be trying to actually act, to play a character, which is odd, because she's the only one in the movie who is.

Miller never saw a fancy shot he didn't love, did he?

It's nice to know the nobody-can't-tell-it's-you-if-you-wear-a-small-domino-mask idea is still around. It'll probably live forever.

Plaster of Paris, too? What is this, the Spirit's greatest girlfriends? Oh, and here comes Sam Jackson in a Nazi uniform and monocle, about which I can have nothing coherent to say.

Every action movie requires a Talking Killer scene, doesn't it? It must be in the contracts.

Miller really didn't understand the point of The Spirit, did he?

Yes, the only thing that will stop the Spirit is chopping him into a million pieces and mailing him all over the place...unless just stabbing him in the chest is good enough.

I'm so sorry to learn that Miller is yet another in the long line of people who don't know what "gunsel" really means.

I bet that would have been quite entertaining on a big screen with a crowd that didn't expect it to be any good. At home on a TV, the lameness crests higher.

Saving Publishing -- the Jonathan Karp Way

I have mixed feelings about Jonathan Karp's recent article for Publishers Weekly, in which he laid out his "12 Steps to Better Book Publishing." On the one hand, I imagine they would make publishing more consistently successful and profitable. On the other, the only way they'd do that would be through unfeasible collusion in restraint of trade, losses of the jobs of at least half of the people currently working in book publishing, and publication schedules that resemble Karp's own Twelve imprint (one guaranteed big-seller a month and nothing else). Since I enjoy both reading books outside that narrow framework and a publishing ecosystem with jobs for myself and my friends, it's not a model I can entirely agree with.

And so I'll rephrase Karp's rules in terms that the rest of us -- the ones who don't run our own imprints and have PW fawning over how visionary we are -- can understand.

Prologue: Don't publish books that Karp doesn't like, particularly if they are "arcane." Any book that won't sell a hundred thousand copies is just not worth it! Books by ex-Presidents are a bad idea; likewise books about food, sex and religion. (What do people do to keep themselves occupied in Karp's world, if they're uninterested in politics, sex, food, and religion?)

Also, don't ever publish a book if anyone else has published a book on the same or a similar topic. Unless that topic is the Titanic, of course! The only possible future for publishing is to "invest time and resources into major works and to market them with overwhelming force."

End Kabuki Publishing: Never be enthusiastic about the books you publish. The only sales reps you need to care about are the "key" ones. Only big things count!

Also, Karp thinks big mainstream publishing is made up almost entirely of phonies, and he's going to go feed the ducks instead of playing along.

Prioritize and Specialize: Ignore most of your list. Only care about things with huge potential. Karp urges specialization...but he also urges only concentrating on things with huge potential, which means everyone should have the same specialty. So try not to specialize in anything that might qualify as an actual specialty or genre.

Tell the Truth: It's time to stop being nice to authors and say directly to them the things you mutter to your colleagues. As a bonus, this may also help achieve the massive job losses mentioned above.

Screw relationships! Screw good sense! Tell that big bestselling jerk on your list precisely what you think of the turd that just landed on your desk!

Also, ebooks and POD are to be used as dumping grounds for bad acquisition decisions. A very smart contracts manager will be required to get that language past agents. And talented accountants will be required to deal with the flood of red ink.

Stop the copycat books: That topic was Karp's idea first! So you can't publish a book on it. Never, ever publish a book on any subject remotely similar to earlier books, like a biography of Lincoln, or a Tuesdays With Lots of Morries, or yet another book about politics by an insider. No, no, no.

More editorial quality control: You get to tell Dan Brown what goes in or out of his book, because your imprint is on the spine. More generally, you can publish only great big books and still hope to be more important and powerful than the real authors of those books. You are also the King of Ruritania!

Imprints for everyone: Oddly enough, this is the one I have absolutely no problem with; my current employer operates under a system almost exactly like Karp describes, and I find that works very well. But we don't do a tiny number of great big books, either. We do a lot of very targeted niche books, and have a lot of people in aggregate working on those books, most of which Karp would probably deem not worth publishing. So I don't believe this plan actually fits in with the rest of Karp's suggestions as closely as he believes it does.

One bidder per company: Most of you acquisition editors? Hit the pavement. Or get demoted to development editors. Only your boss's boss's boss will be allowed to negotiate for the company -- you know, the one you always struggle to make understand what your program is and why it's important?

This is the kind of idea that sounds wonderful when you're already the head of a major imprint.

Pay authors to market their work: No snark here, though my experience is that the bulk of authors -- across categories and genres -- aren't any good at this or (to be kinder) know what to do. Though, if we're drastically slashing the number of books published, we can get rid of all the authors who don't already market themselves effectively. That'll increase the average quality of author marketing immediately.

Be loyal to the book, not the ego: Very nice words. When the Marcus Dohles and Brian Murrays of this world repeat them, and back editors/publicists/sales reps rather than bigfoot authors when push comes to shove, people might actually believe them.

(And when books by John Grisham/James Patterson/Nora Roberts/Laurell Hamilton stop selling at massive levels year in and year out, showing that readers are immeasurably more loyal to the author than to the publisher.)

Let's be honest: if one of Twelve's forthcoming books came in from the author, and it was lousy, do you really think it would be suddenly downgraded to POD?

And, once again, Karp is demanding the all-big-books-all-the-time model of publishing: only hit home runs.

Announce all deals: Another nice thing, but making it happen would be an applied exercise in game theory -- the first mover would be heavily penalized, and the last holdout would have the most power. It's very unlikely to happen, unless agents do it -- they have more incentive to do so to begin with.

Downsize: And Karp will go first -- he's resigning to spend more time raising rutabagas. His comments about mid-list authors are laughable; under his plans many writers who are currently at the top of lists would find themselves in the middle of much smaller lists. And anyone not at the top of a list would be gone entirely. But there's always "digital distribution" for all those lousy books he'd rather not see published!

Advertise: Again, only books that you can spend lots and lots of money on deserve to be published. Publishing is about big men spending big money to put out big books!


Feh! If this is the way to save publishing, I'd rather it stay on life-support.

Edit, a day later: Since this post is getting an unusual amount of traffic, I should point out that there are a number of things in Karp's essay that I didn't disagree with. I mentioned a couple of them above, but left the others unstated because that wasn't the focus of the piece.

My disagreements are more important than my points of agreement, because of the overarching aim of Karp's essay. He's trying to force all of trade publishing into a narrowly focused blockbuster-all-the-time model, which is unsustainable. The real problem with trade publishing today is that model, not the fact that smaller books manage to be published along the way.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Saturday Is Bond Day #7: Diamonds Are Forever

Diamonds Are Forever is where the Bond Movies tip over into self-parody; fittingly, this is the first movie to be made in the '70s. For all of the flaws of On Her Majesty's Secret Service -- and it certainly was flawed -- it was at least in the vein of the earlier movies, with a tough and steely James Bond. Diamonds is a premature Roger Moore Bond; Connery returns here four years after his last outing as Bond looking at least a decade older and slower. The tough, toned young Connery of the first five movies -- four of which were filmed within four years -- has softened, and there's a slowness in his step and a hint of gray in his hair. If the movie took note of that, or acted as if the last movie happened (other than Bond's monomania against Blofeld), that would be one thing. But it doesn't; it pretends that this is what Bond always was like.

There are those who prefer the half-seen Blofeld of Thunderball and From Russia With Love. There are those who admire Telly Savalas's hard-edged portrayal from Secret Service (though I found Savalas far too American, and far too different from the previous actors). And there are the wise, who know -- with me -- that Donald Pleasance as the facially-scarred Blofeld from You Only Live Twice is the epitome of the character. But I very much doubt if there's anyone now -- even if there might have been a very few in the early '70s -- who would give preference to Charles Gray as the multiple Blofelds of Diamonds. (For one thing, it's impossible to see Gray now and not see him spinning a globe and taking us on a strange journey.) Gray's Mao jackets -- though less embarrassing than some of the '70s wear sported by other members of the cast, and undeniably super-villain-esque -- are also not particularly intimidating.

The plot is silly and makes little sense; even Bond objects to his being dragged into a routine diamond smuggling case. And then the movie bogs down in Las Vegas for most of its length, including an inexplicable moon-buggy chase in the desert. The major henchmen -- Mr. Wint and Mr. Kidd -- are creepy in a bad way, and never seem to be a serious threat to Bond. (And the killer bimbos, Bambi and Thumper, are just hang-your-head embarrassing.)

It's a '70s Bond movie, and the template for the ones to come. Moore does this kind of Bond better than Connery does, and gets better set-ups to act against. But this was definitely the harbinger of things to come, sadly.

House of Many Ways by Diana Wynne Jones

Books for younger readers come in a near-infinite variety of age bands and formats, from plastic-coated books that shed the drool of infants up to the kind of novels that are marked "16+" and snatched up by thirteen-year-olds everywhere. But, once you get up into real novels, with the length and vocabulary of those for adults, there's only two kinds of books: those that tell kids that the world is just as bad as they're sure it is, and those that tell them that the world is just as wonderful as they hope it is.

Flora's Dare, which I recently read, is an example of the first kind -- there's real danger, and the definite possibility of death for the young protagonist. The world is not fair, it's not kind, and stupid mistakes can be just as fatal as in our own world. (The Harry Potter books are another example of this, as are most of the stories in which teens feel put upon and downtrodden.)

House of Many Ways, on the other hand, is of the other persuasion: what danger that lurks in these pages is slight and easily dealt with, as the focus is on growing up into a trusted place in a loving world, with useful work lined up for the heroine and the bulk of the book given up to scenes of marvelous domesticity. Both kids of books can be equally as much fun to read, though one must admit that the first type -- which conforms more closely to the jaundiced view of the world held by most adults -- is usually given the edge as more realistic and true to life.

But let's leave that all aside for now, and travel back to the world of Jones's novel Howl's Moving Castle. It's now a half-generation later; Sophie and Howl have been married for some time, and have an toddler son, Morgan. But this book focuses on another girl, Charmain Baker, who's sent to housesit for her Great-Uncle William (the Royal Wizard of Great Norland), while he goes off to be cured of his serious but unspecified illness by the elves. She's thrilled to be getting out from under the thumb of her conventionality-loving mother -- the kind of pseudo-antagonist that shows up in books like these, usually in more virulent form than here, to deplore anything interesting, resourceful, or intelligent that a heroine wants to do as "unladylike" -- and expects to spend her time just sitting and reading as much as possible.

She does have to do a bit more than that, but she's not given a lot of work; the wizard's house runs itself most of the time, down to providing meals when given the proper orders. The dirty dishes and laundry, though, have been piling up in the kitchen in advance of her arrival...but Charmain, left to her own devices, would probably have never touched them. But then Peter Regis arrives -- he's the son of the Witch of Montalbino, and he's supposed to become William's apprentice -- and Charmain isn't allowed to loaf around quite so much as she might like.

She also runs into a lubbock -- a very nasty intelligent magical creature that plants its parasitic young in humans -- when an exploration of the house leads out a window high in the nearby mountains.

And, most importantly, the King of Great Norland -- who affects not an iota of pomp, as often happens in YA novels that tend to the wonderful -- replies to her note, saying that he'd love to have her help catalog the royal library. At the castle, she meets Sophie, Calcifer the fire demon, and, eventually, Howl, who is in a different form for most of the book for a reason that I must have skimmed over.

So Charmain is away from home, doing pretty much just what she pleases, and hobnobbing with a very friendly king. Along the way, she does have to save the kingdom, but that plot stays at the level of background details until the last couple of chapters, when the big threat to the kingdom and the danger of the lubbock is dealt with very quickly. House of Many Ways is a cozy fantasy novel, one without much danger, where the pleasure are imagining how much fun it would be to be in Charmain's place and in re-meeting old friends from Howl's Moving Castle. In my experience, Jones generally has more of a plot than this, and usually more tension and consequences. House of Many Ways is a big cream puff of a book; it's sweet and pleasant while you're reading it, but it doesn't linger long, and the reader wants a more substantial YA novel almost immediately afterward.

(Luckily, I had one: Adam Rex's The True Meaning of Smekday.)

Monday, April 20, 2009

Saturday is Bond Day #6: On Her Majesty's Secret Service

This was the hardest yet of the Bond movies to find; I ended up getting a VHS tape from a library after Netflix, Blockbuster, and several other libraries failed to get me a DVD on time. And that makes sense; On Her Majesty's Secret Service is easily the most obscure of the Bond movies and features George Lazenby's one-off appearance as Bond.

I also found it the longest and dullest of the movies so far; this may in part have been because there were two squirming boys on the couch opposite...but those squirming boys were also reacting to the movie, and hadn't squirmed like that for any of the previous films.

Lazenby isn't bad as Bond, but he's much more stolid and uninspiring than Connery was, and doesn't seem as lethal or focused as Connery could be. He's not quite carved out of a block of wood, but he might as well have been.

Telly Savalas picks up the role of Ernst Stavro Blofeld, and I didn't think he did it well at all. Savalas is essentially American, which doesn't suit Blofeld. He's also much too straightforward and hot-headed; Blofeld is a conniver and a schemer, always in the background and always two steps ahead. (Charles Grey, in the otherwise much worse Diamonds Are Forever, gets that part of Blofeld right.) Blofeld, to mention just one thing, would never ski down a mountain after Bond -- that's what minions are for.

Secret Service has two essentially separate plots, which touch each other only in occasional and unlikely ways: Bond falls in love with Countess/mob daughter Tracy (Diana Rigg, the best thing about the movie), and Bond pursues Blofeld, who has a silly plot to conquer the world through hypnotized gorgeous young women in an Alpine allergy-research facility. And they both take too long, and are unconvincing. Secret Service does end well, I must admit -- the last five to ten minutes are the best thing about the movie.

I suspect some Bond fans like Secret Service because it was the last of the serious Bond movies for a good twenty years, and because it's a plausible counter-intuitive choice as "best in the series." But it's really not all that good -- if it had Connery and Pleasance, a tighter hand on the screenplay and about twenty minutes cut out of it, it could have easily been the strongest Bond movie, since the material was there. But the Secret Service that was made squandered its potential, and the movie that actually exists is minor and bland in a dozen ways.

Missing Connections

Today, over at ComicMix, I just reviewed the Julia Wertz-edited comics anthology I Saw You...

Flora's Dare by Ysabeau S. Wilce

Now that I've been free of the treadmill of the SFBC for a while, I'm coming to see what my true tastes in books are -- the ones I pick up when I've got a choice. And first-person YA fantasy novels by women are coming in surprisingly strong, with this and Justine Larbalestier's How to Ditch Your Fairy within just over a month. It's not precisely what I expected, but they're both tremendously entertaining books, so I'll take it.

Flora's Dare is the second novel in a series -- I expect at least one more, from the hints and ending of this book, but not necessarily anything beyond that -- set in an magical alternate-historical San Francisco (called Califa here, and the capital of the same-named polity) where North America was apparently only discovered and settled (thinly, at that) by the Vikings. The first book was Flora Segunda -- which is where I suggest interested readers start -- and there have also been a number of short stories set in the same world, though these, as far as I can tell, don't involve Flora herself at all.

Flora's Dare is more successful than the first book; the world is already established, and now Wilce can just use it. There's also a nice example of "be careful what you wish for" plotting on Wilce's part -- in Segunda, Flora was trying to break her father Hotspur out of a several-years-long depression, and succeeded. And that would be wonderful, except that Flora was essentially free to do whatever she wanted while Hotspur was depressive -- her mother Buck is the head of the local military, and so away from home nearly all the time, and her one sibling is an older sister off in the military as well. But now, at the beginning of Dare, Hotspur has reasserted discipline in the household, and is making Flora's life very difficult with his incessant inspections and rules. (It's a very, very military family; he's ex-service as well.)

Flora, of course, thinks she's old enough to make all of her own decisions and go her own way -- and the reader sympathizes with her, because she is our protagonist and because we remember she was quite competent in Segunda. And all of the plot of Flora's Dare starts because Flora wants to go out to a concert that will run past her curfew -- partially because she just wants to see the concert, and partially because, after the events of Segunda, she has strengthened her desire to become a Ranger, and, to do that, she needs to study the magical language of Grammatica. Her parents dislike Grammatica and avoid it. The greatest adept she knows -- Lord Axacaya, refugee from the Huitzil Empire -- is detested by her family. So instead she's decided to approach Firemonkey, leader of the outlawed radical Eschatalogical Immenation, which is devoted to overthrowing Califa's loose client status under the Huitzils, and any other government they can topple. Firemonkey is also the lead singer of the band Horses of Instruction -- some things about California just don't change, no matter how alternate the world is.

Things quickly get more complicated and dangerous, as the concert is raided by the authorities right after Flora discovers a member of the band is the last person she'd expect. And then Flora learns of an imminent danger to the entire city, uses it as an excuse to talk to Axacaya -- and he asks for her help to stop it. And her best friend Udo not only has a new -- and utterly odious -- girlfriend, but is also hot on the trail of the outlaw Springheel Jack, who is worth a huge reward. (Though Jack is tougher to deal with after he's dead than either of them thought.) And, on top of all that, after the concert Flora is grounded -- confined to her room.

Will any of that stop a determined young woman of the ancient military family of Fyrdraaca? Perhaps not. But learning a long-hidden truth about that family just might.

Flora's Dare is sprightlier, more inventive, and moves faster than Flora Segunda did, and the stakes -- for Flora and for Califa -- might be even higher. It's the rare sequel that tops its predecessor, and the ending will make any reader wish that the promised third novel, Flora's Fury, was already available. The back cover may say "Ages 12 and up," but that ranges way up; this is a novel for Young Adults that even Not-At-All-Young Adults like myself can savor and love.

Reviewing the Mail: Week of 4/18

Every week, I get books in for review, and, every Monday, I list them here. Many of these books will get fuller reviews later, once I've read them, but many will not -- just because I won't have time to read and think and writer about all of them.

This is a light week: just three books. So typing this post should take much less time than it does some weeks...

First is The Sheriff of Yrnameer, a satirical SF novel by Michael Rubens, who used to be a writer and producer for The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. The hero is Cole, a "hapless space scoundrel on the run," who travels through various "advertising-saturated worlds" to deliver "freeze-dried orphans" to "Yrnameer, the last unspoiled and unsponsored world in the galaxy." And now I have to swallow down some knee-jerk condescension; from those facts I already have an image of Rubens as a Hollywoody carpet-bagger and his plot as a third-hand warmed-over version of '50s Galaxy. (Even if I'm being generous, his setting seems to owe a lot to Pohl and Kornbluth and Sheckley and Knight and Leiber and Brown and....) But I haven't read it, so I'll suspend judgment -- it could be wonderful, and it was obviously good enough to attract the attention of an agent (John Silbersack, who knows SF backwards and forwards) and the august bodies of Pantheon, which will publish this in hardcover on August 4th.

Stephen Baxter's new novel is Flood, about a world in which the oceans are rising much more quickly and inexorably than is true in our world. There's a hint in the flap copy that the oceans will -- for some unspecified reason -- also rise higher than should be plausible, high enough to drown every place in which human beings can live. That's a suitably dour background for Baxter, who seems to delight in finding new ways to make humanity insignificant, endangered, or simply extinct. Roc is publishing Flood on May 5th in hardcover, and it's perfect for those of you who don't have enough to worry about already, or who are fans of the grand British tradition of unlikely world-destroying events.

And last for this week is The Photographer, a graphic novel by photojournalist Didier Lefevre, cartoonist Emmanuel Guibert, and graphic designer and colorist Frederic Lemercier, based on Lefevre's first trip to Afghanistan as a journalist in 1986, traveling with a group from the international relief organization Doctors Without Borders. It was originally published in France in three volumes before Lefevre's untimely death in 2007, and has been translated by Alexis Siegel for this first English-language publication. First Second will release it as a large-format paperback on May 12th.

Sunday, April 19, 2009

J.G. Ballard, 1930-2009

British novelist J.G. Ballard has died this Sunday morning, April 19th, at the age of 78, reports the BBC. Cause of death was not mentioned, but Ballard was diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer in 2006, and that likely was the main cause.

Ballard was born in Shanghai in 1930, the son of a British industrialist, and grew up in the International Settlement there. Shanghai was occupied by the Japanese after the Pearl Harbor attack in 1941, and foreign nationals -- including the Ballards -- were moved to the Lunghua Civilian Assembly Center in early 1943. Ballard turned his experiences as a teenager in the camp into fiction in his most famous novel, Empire of the Sun, and wrote of that time more directly in his last book, the autobiography Miracles of Life.

After the war, Ballard went to England, where he completed school and then went on to study medicine at King's College, Cambridge. He abandoned those studies for reading English literature at the University of London, with hopes of becoming a professional writer. It was only after joining the RAF in 1953 that -- when posted in a airbase in Moose Jaw, Canada -- he discovered American Science Fiction magazines and decided that the stories he wanted to write could fit into that genre.

After returning to the UK after his RAF stint ended, Ballard's writing career began in the British SF magazines, starting with "Prima Belladonna" in New Worlds for December 1956. He continued writing SF short stories, and began to publish novels in the early '60s, quitting his day-job as an editor of a scientific journal almost immediately. His early novels -- The Wind From Nowhere, The Drowned World, The Burning World, and The Crystal World -- were SFnal novels, all stories of apocalypse that moved further and further from the traditional British "cozy catastrophe" as Ballard grew more and more confident with his own writing and voice.

Ballard's career turned to the avant-garde and political with the "condensed novels" collected in his collection The Atrocity Exhibition; many of them were published in SFnal outlets, but, in retrospect, this was the work that saw Ballard break with the SF field and continue his essential obsessions -- sex, death, the anomie of modern life, and a cool, detached viewpoint verging on nihilism -- into more direct and immediate channels based on contemporary life. The three following novels of the early '70s -- Crash, Concrete Island, and High Rise -- are the most uncompromising and fearless of his career, slicing with the detachment of the surgeon he nearly was at the psychological underpinnings of the world as he saw them.

Subsequent novels and works reiterated his central concerns and images, building up the quintessentially Ballardian landscape: drained swimming pools, carefully planned buildings fallen into physical or moral decay, aircraft in the air or crashed on the ground, the outer settings that mirrors the characters' inner worlds. His most successful novel of that period was Empire of the Sun, which explained the bases for so many of Ballard's key images while at the same time contextualizing them into a fine novel that was not simply a retelling of his own life.

Ballard's central concerns never varied, though the styles of his novels and stories did, veering from SF through the avant garde to more traditional literary novels and then into magic realism and the crime story an back out again. He was one of the great British writers of the 20th century, with a instantly recognizable style and matter and a endlessly fecund imagination watered ceaselessly by those same few wells.

He will be greatly missed, and he will now never be a SFWA Grand Master. But he'll still be read in a hundred years, when so many of his contemporaries and competitors are utterly forgotten.

For those who haven't read Ballard: SF readers should start with The Best Short Stories. Readers of mainstream fiction should try Empire of the Sun. And those who want to dive into the deep end should look at Crash or The Atrocity Exhibition.

Another Stack of Comics

Because I don't want to give all of these things their own entries -- partially because I still have hopes of keeping the length of the review of each of them down to something reasonable -- I'm shoving them together into one post, which will go up once I've read a whole bunch of comics, or the post has gotten too long, whichever comes first.

These will probably all be books that I got from the local libraries, as I ransack their somewhat hodge-podge graphic novel selections. (Example: in the entire system, they have Spirit Archives Vol. 17, but no others.)

Plastic Man, Vol. 2: Rubber Bandits by Kyle Baker (DC Comics, 2005, $14.99)

This collects the second clump of stories from Baker's well-regarded but short-lived Plastic Man series of 2004-2006 (20 issues, as far as I can tell). I looked at the first volume in late 2007, and wanted to like it better than I did.

And my reaction to this book is pretty similar. I laughed a lot while reading it, but I still wish Baker's panels at this point in his career weren't so blocky and so utterly separated from each other; it looks like he draws each panel individually and then sticks them together on the page. This is funny stuff, but it still looks a lot more like storyboards than comics, and that tends to damp the energy of his panel transitions. This Plastic Man is supposed to be manic and high-energy, but the discrete square panels and floating captions leech a lot of that energy out. Oh, it's definitely funny, but it comes across as less funny and goofy than it should, as if we're seeing all of the hijinks through a frame.

Ojingogo by Matthew Forsythe (Drawn & Quarterly, September 2008, $14.95)

I glanced at this over the Eisner Judging Weekend, but didn't get to read it then -- one of the other judges noticed that it was nominated as a webcomic in 2004 and then again in 2006, and the consensus of the judges was that we didn't want to just keep giving nominations to the exact same things every two years.

It's a pantomime comic -- well, there are tiny bits of possible dialogue that I suspect is in Korean, but that's very minor -- set in a surreal world among lots of very strange-looking creatures. The girl and squid on the cover are the central characters, though they're not precisely friends. No one seems to be all that friendly anyone else here, and everybody changes sizes at the drop of a hat, too.

It's too bad that Warren Ellis used up the sentence "this is one odd fucking book" on Skyscrapers of the Midwest; that's certainly somewhat odd, but Ojingogo races around the odd track five times while Skyscrapers is still putting its shoes on, and then runs up the side of the judging stand for a victory lap. This thing is pretty near indescribable; I can't even begin to characterize the entities in the story. It's worth looking at, and the cartooning is great, but I don't really know what to think of it.

One! Hundred! Demons! by Lynda Barry (Sasquatch Books, 2002, $24.95)

After literally years of claiming that I didn't like Barry's work -- which I'd mostly seen as that alt-weekly strip with Marlys in it, which set my teeth on edge every single time I looked at it -- her introduction to The Best American Comics: 2008 and then the magnificent autobio/writing manual What It Is came as a huge surprise. But I'm big enough to change my mind, and I decided to look for more by Barry (but still avoid that Marlys creature if at all possible).

This is, I think, her book just prior to What It Is, a series of loosely-themed shorter strips that originally appeared on Salon -- in fact, a quick check shows me that they're still there -- in 2000. The book gives the strips a little more context, adding an introduction and collage-style title pages for each story (in the style that blossomed into the much more collage-heavy What It Is).

Barry was inspired by an old Zen painting exercise called One Hundred Demons, though I think the original exercise was just to paint the demons, not to tell stories about them. Barry's demons -- there are actually seventeen of them here -- are stories about things she regrets or can't forget, semi-fictionalized bits of her life. The book One Hundred Demons reprints each typical four-panel Barry page as two panels on each of two facing pages, making them larger and more inviting. (One of the things that annoyed me about Barry's work in the alt-weeklies was how many words she crammed into a tiny space -- reprinting the strips at a larger size keeps all of the words, but allows more space around them.) As in What It Is, Barry mines her own past for moments of universal relevance.

One! Hundred! Demons! isn't as all-encompassing and self-assured as What It Is, but the stories are engrossing and the cartooning is engaging. Barry is much more fun than I used to think she was.

Batman and the Mad Monk: Dark Moon Rising by Matt Wagner (DC Comics, 2006, $14.99)

It may be possible to pinpoint the moment when I decided that long-underwear comics just weren't worth it for me anymore, even if I was following a creator hither and yon across the fields of comics. (I apologize for that metaphor, but I'm feeling puckish tonight.)

I bought Matt Wagner's stylish Batman and the Monster Men -- yet another Batman-early-in-his-career story, beloved by all who want to avoid the morass of contemporary continuity and pretend that they're Frank Miller and David Mazzucchelli -- in 2006, but when this book was published, nine or twelve months later, I picked it up at my comics shop, heaved a sigh, and put it back.

But I've now read it, through the magic of the public library, and it's a very serviceable Matt Wagner entertainment, with appropriately moody coloring from Dave Stewart and a whole lot of Wagner drawings of Batman grimacing as he gets stabbed or sliced by things. It's the loose sequel to Monster Men, and Wagner appears ready to create Batman mini-series as needed for as long as he and DC are interested. And this is quite good for a Batman story, but it's still a Batman story -- derivative and attenuated, with most of its essential strength derived from the audience's long knowledge of these characters. Wagner's capable of much better than this, but I imagine that Batman is a more consistent way of paying the bills, so I don't begrudge him the work. But I will continue to save my money, almost all of the time, for cartoonists doing their own stories.

Tom Strong, Book 1: written by Alan Moore; art by Chris Sprouse and Alan Gordon with segments by a whole bunch of other people (America's Best Comics/Wildstorm/bought by DC and all of Alan's magic couldn't stop it; 2000; $17.95)

I'm not particularly well-read in Moore's return to superheroes of the late '90s; I've picked up Supreme but never read more than a few pages, and I was frankly bored with Promethea. It always looked like a retreat to me: I have no problem with Moore doing whatever work most interests him now -- and I'm even willing to accept that this is what most interested him in 1999 -- but a definite lack of ambition was visible from miles away.

But people have generally said good things about Tom Strong, so, when I had a chance to finally take a look at his adventures, I took it.

And it turns out I was right: this is pleasant, but very minor, and there isn't much ambition to it. Moore is writing modern Doc Savage stories about a big guy who's a great role model and always does the right thing. The result are perfectly acceptable adventure stories, with very slick, professional art from Sprouse and Gordon, but the format -- having a required flashback (or, in one case, a flashforward) in the middle of each issue -- gets a bit tedious, as does the relentlessly sunny tone of the villain-punching. The backstory isn't particularly interesting or complicated; Strong married his childhood sweetheart and had one daughter (who seems to still be a teenager in 1999, even though she might be seventy years old), and everybody is very friendly and happy.

Tom and his family never seem to be in much danger; they're always much more than a match for any threats that they confront. That makes for happy endings, but not for a whole lot of tension. Tom Strong is a kinder, gentler Alan Moore, and I found it awfully thin soup.

Will Eisner's The Spirit Archives, Vol. 17: ostensibly entirely by Will Eisner, though he had plenty of assistants whose individual contributions can no longer be traced (DC Comics, 2005, $49.99)

I've spent the last few years catching up on Eisner, whom I hadn't read much before that -- I've looked at The Best of the Spirit, Life, in Pictures, A Contract With God and related books, The Plot, and Will Eisner's New York. I think I've got a good handle on his modern graphic novel career, which has some real strengths (besides the mere fact that he was a pioneer at nearly everything he did) as well as some very glaring weaknesses. But I've read less widely in his Spirit stories, so I'm trying to look at those whenever I have a chance.

This volume is the single one that any of the libraries in my home county has; it seems a very odd and arbitrary choice, but at least this book -- collecting the weekly seven-page stories from July through December of 1948 -- is from what I understand to be the best period of the strip.

The things that annoy me in Eisner's later work show up in this phase of his career quite differently: the dialogue is much less ethnic (as are all of the characters), but his distinctive, and off-putting, way of E-M-P-H-A-S-I-Z-I-N-G words was just as intrusive in 1948 as it was forty years later. (I always want to read those words with dashes in them as if the speaker was spelling them out -- and I very much doubt that was Eisner's intention.) He had a quite different cast of stereotypes in the '40s: not the soap-opera pre-war Jews of his later work, but a Central Casting conglomeration of vaguely Mediterranean gangsters, a comic-relief black boy, upright Irish cops, and the obligatory "non-ethnic" WASPs at the center.

But his strengths were all fully formed in 1948 as well: a great sense of page layout and design (second to no one in the world at that time, and hugely influential even now); wonderfully expressive cartooning, particularly of figures in motion; and a masterful way with story, allowing him to shift from pure farce to near-tragedy in subsequent stories with the same characters. The Spirit stories are very much genre tales -- they're mostly crime-fighting stories only a step or two removed from superheroes, with some side trips into supernatural, sentimental, and even Western stories -- but they're all, at this point, exceptionally well-told stories, by a creator (and his uncredited staff) at the height of his energies.

The Freebooters Collection by Barry Windsor-Smith (Fantagraphics, 2005, $34.95)

According to the cover, this is The Freebooters, or perhaps Windsor-Smith Studio: The Freebooters. There's a half-title page (though no title page, per se) that says Barry Windsor-Smith: Storyteller: 2005. But the copyright page says twice that it's The Freebooters Collection, so I'm going with that. The rest of the book has a bit of that air of uncertainty, as well -- when the reader comes to the end, he realizes that this isn't actually a complete story. For thirty-five dollars, what the reader gets is all of the "Freebooters" material that appeared in the nine issues of Barry Windsor-Smith: Storyteller of 1996-97, plus a twenty-seven page aborted beginning of the story from a few years earlier, plus another forty-eight pages of pieces of continuation of the main story (including various sidebars and diversions), plus notes on the story in a definite voice (which is neither Windsor-Smith himself nor otherwise specified), plus a reprint of an article about the storyline from the magazine Hogan's Alley. That adds up to nearly two hundred pages of art and story -- gorgeous, intricate Windsor-Smith art and engrossing story -- and other materials, but nothing at all like an ending and not even all that much middle; this is still all beginning and scene-setting.

So The Freebooters Collection is a monument, or perhaps a tombstone, for a dead story. There's no reason to think that we'll ever know what happens to any of these people; Windsor-Smith had intended that this story would run for several years (in tandem with the other two stories in Storyteller), but that didn't happen and never will. Maybe Windsor-Smith will get a chance to go back to this story eventually, but there's been no sign of that so far, and it's been over ten years. (This book, despite being published in 2005, doesn't seem to have any material from later than the original 96-97 run of Storyteller.)

I can't say much about the actual story of Freebooters; it was still gearing up when Storyteller shut down. (Storyteller's model -- three stories in one magazine-format monthly publication, with each story rotating between five-to-seven-page "backup" stories and a twenty-some-page "lead" story -- didn't help here, since every new installment had a different page count and thus was limited as to how much it could move the story forward.) The characters are interesting, and the plot is just getting started when the story cuts out. Perhaps that was part of the problem -- if, nine months into a series, a story is still setting up the situation, that's too slow for a lot of readers.

The other interesting aspect of Freebooters is Windsor-Smith's anger and bile at Dark Horse Comics, the original publisher of Storyteller -- he
still firmly believes that it was the almost total lack of advertising and marketing support from its original publisher (hereafter referred to as OP) that kept it completely invisible to an entire demographic of an adult market that had quit reading comics years before.
Yes, Windsor-Smith is mad that Dark Horse -- during the middle of the longest sustained downturn in the modern comics industry, when half of the comics shops went out of business, several publishers went under, and Marvel went bankrupt -- didn't spend unprecedented amounts of money to advertise it to people who don't read comics.

And what would it have attracted them to? A large-format, relatively expensive monthly periodical, sold in stores that those potential customers don't patronize, telling three entirely separate stories -- none of which were complete, or anything like it, in a single issue. Windsor-Smith is a wonderful storyteller, yes, but is thirty-two pages of three pieces of set-up going to be sufficient to convince a non-comic-reader to come back month after month? (Even assuming they can be convinced to come to a comics shop in the first place, which I'm very dubious about.)

Even now, ten years later, similar projects of much, much higher commercial potential -- like the Stephen King comics from Marvel -- can bring in an outside audience to comic shops once (for the debut issue), but sales drop quickly afterward. The audience for periodicial comics is entirely within the direct market; any creator who wants to reach beyond that needs to have a complete story to offer that potential "outside" audience.

So I think Windsor-Smith had very, very unrealistic aims for Storyteller, and that he chose the worst year possible to try to achieve them. If he'd picked one of the three stories, and told it straight through, he would have had a better chance. (But, even then, I expect that outside audience would only really have been interested once there was a single book, at a reasonable price -- this one doesn't qualify, since it's incomplete and not a reasonable price for that audience.) If he'd kept the book to a more typical size, he might have had better luck within the direct market -- and there was no serious chance of getting Storyteller distributed outside of that market, anyway.

It's a shame; I bought all of the issues of Storyteller -- and still have them, somewhere, though I had the same storage problems as everyone else -- and wanted to see it succeed. But, looking back at it, and with a lot more experience in publishing and marketing since then, I can't side with Windsor-Smith, as much as I'd like to. As far as I can see, Dark Horse made a heroic effort on behalf of a talented and demanding creator, and got absolutely no credit for it. (And probably lost a bundle as well.)

Saturday, April 18, 2009

Oops! I Forgot to Post!

I sat down here this evening to write a bit about the two graphic novels I polished off today, and probably shove out the post that would then cover seven of the suckers. Instead, I've just spent the last two hours reading through the first two-hundred-and-some pages of Darths & Droids, a fumetti webcomic by a bunch of Australian guys, along the lines of the great DM of the Rings.

Let me explain further: "fumetti" means that it's done with photographs, in this case screencaps from the movie Star Wars: The Phantom Menace. And the overall plot is that a gaming group is RPGing their way through this setting, starting with two players as Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan and expanding as other players join the group. (Like DM of the Rings, the assumption is that nobody has ever heard of any of this stuff before -- that this gaming session was how all of the twists and turns of the plot were determined.)

It's laugh-out-loud hilarious, both on the level of jokes and conceptually -- one of the best early bits is that Jar-Jar is a hastily rolled-up character to keep one of the guy's kid sister occupied when she came along to the second gaming session. You probably need to know a little bit about gaming to get the point, but only a very little -- I haven't role-played in twenty years (maybe more) and it was all perfectly clear.

It's exceptionally funny, has remarkably good characterization (both of the players and, when appropriate to them, their characters-in-the-game), and actually, in its demented way, makes the plot of Phantom Menace make sense. They've just started on Attack of the Clones in the last few weeks, and I'm adding this to my RSS reader immediately.

Friday, April 17, 2009

The Return of Manga Friday

After a long hiatus, I had a new "Manga Friday" post for ComicMix this afternoon, reviewing four first volumes of series about girls in sailor suits and short skirts: Sayonara, Zetsubou-Sensei, Gakuen Prince, Oninagi, and Negima!? Neo.

Next week, with any luck -- and if I don't end up in the emergency room again for what turned out to be utterly inadequate reasons -- I'll be back to my ostensible pace of three reviews a week. I might even get to the stack of Phillippine comics I've been looking at for three months...

One Reason I'm Quite Fond of the Library

I've currently got 19 books out, with a street value of over $384 -- and that's not counting the nineteen books my two sons collectively have out, or the two videos. (Or the new Daniel Pinkwater book waiting for me to pick it up tomorrow, either.)

Whenever the local libraries here in North Jersey started collecting graphic novels semi-seriously was a great day for both me and my wallet. (Not to mention my bookshelves.) I still wish they'd collect more seriously for adults, but I guess the Yoshihiro Tatsumis and Seths of this world are a minority taste.

(I'm thinking about this because we'll be going to the library tomorrow, so I have to gather up most of this stuff to take it back...which is not as easy as it might seem when there are forty items checked out and strewn across three floors of the house.)

Quote of the Week

"The Glenn Beck show has been drearily fascinating of late. It’s not often that we get to watch someone go insane on national television; trapped in an echo chamber of his own spiraling egomania, with apparently no one at his network willing to pull the plug and put him out of his misery, Beck has lately gone from being a mildly annoying media dingbat to a self-imagined messiah who looks like he’s shouldering more and more of the burdens of Christ with each passing day."
- Matt Taibbi, "The Peasant Mentality Lives on in America"

Note from the Hornswoggler: I don't actually watch Beck myself, so I'm not vouching for the accuracy of the description of him. From the snippets I've seen online, he does seem to be one of the more entertainingly insane TV ranting heads, but such clips are chosen for maximum lunacy to begin with. But I really like the quote anyway; Taibbi has a nice way of cloaking an all-out attack in phrasing that looks like commiseration.

Thursday, April 16, 2009

What Old Adventure Movies Should Tween Boys See?

As you may know, I have two sons, currently aged eight and eleven.

We've been watching various adventure movies together over the past couple of years, as I teach them about their heritage as white American males. We've seen the first half-dozen James Bond movies (and are continuing, probably to the end of Roger Moore), all four Indiana Jones films, and all but the last Star Wars movie.

But I'm sure there's more that we all would love that I haven't thought of yet. So I wanted to ask for suggestions.

I've been trying to stay at PG rather than PG-13 in most cases, but we're already well into the old-fashioned sex & violence with Indy and 007, so I may be guarding a barn door that's been open for a while.

Also, I haven't seen essentially any of the big blockbuster movies of the '90s and early aughts, so if you're thinking "Surely he's considered Spider-Man," the answer would be no, since I've never seen it myself.

Any suggestions are welcome, and stories about movies actually enjoyed by boys of that age this decade would be particularly helpful.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Amelia Rules! (three volumes) by Jimmy Gownley

One of the more surprising finds during my Eisner reading last month was the fourth volume of Jimmy Gownley's young readers series Amelia Rules! -- I'd thought it was minor and soaked in sentimentality (before I'd actually read it), but found it was better-written and more interesting than that. It's still an all-ages series about cute kids and the imaginative scrapes they get into in a mostly idealized small town, yes, but there was an unexpected emotional depth to the characters, so I wanted to check out the rest of the series.

It turned out that local libraries had all three of the earlier books, so I ran through all of the earlier stories in less than a week...and now I'm not quite as impressed by Amelia Rules! as I was at first. Part of that is because Gownley has been improving as he's gone along, so the first volume has the most obvious and heavy-handed of the stories. And when I jumped immediately from the fourth volume from the first, I went from his best Amelia Rules! stories to the least of them.

The Amelia of the title is Amelia Louise McBride, a girl of about ten whose parents have just gotten divorced as the series begins. Her mother has moved herself and Amelia back to her old home town in Pennsylvania from their home in New York City, and moved in with Amelia's aunt Tanner. The divorce is handled well; it never becomes as thuddingly obvious thematically as I suspected it might.

So Amelia is settling into a new town, and making new friends -- they keep accumulating as the books go on (which makes a much richer, more realistic picture of childhood than the typical "here's me, my two best friends who are always with me, the one comic relief and one bully" cast of too many entertainments for kids. There's Reggie, whom Amelia sort-of likes, and Rhonda, who also likes Reggie in that mostly secret way of grade-schoolers. And then there's Pajamaman, who is Reggie's sidekick, who never talks, and who always wears pajamas. (He's also the token really poor kid, and -- unlike the rest of the unpopular main cast -- friendly with the cute blonde girls at school, so he gets to be a whole constellation of "wacky friend" cliches.)

The first book is made up of short stories, as Amelia meets these new kids, starts at Joe McCarthy Elementary -- where the "school sucks! teachers are all evil morons, amirite?!" nudging gets tired very quickly -- and talks to the audience a lot. It does reach the level of true emotion, particularly by the end, but there's a lot of sentiment to wade through first.

The second book adds family members (dead ones, mostly) for Amelia, continues the love triangle, and has Amelia and Rhonda actually become friends instead of just loathing each other. The pretend-superhero stuff continues -- Reggie is obsessed with being a superhero, and drags all the rest along with him -- and the kids find their arch-enemies in a similar group of kids from across town who dress up as ninjas. Luckily, they're not just a joke; they actually become characters and continue to be important. We also learn more about Tanner's very unlikely past.

And then the third volume is one long story, in which Amelia meets even more new people, almost moves again, and finishes up fourth grade. Gownley also steps up his writing here; the focus is more tightly on the characters and their dialogue really rings true. (He manages to make the head ninja, Kyle, both a button-pushing little jerk and a sympathetic character, for one.)

Amelia Rules! is not the masterpiece some of the quotes on the book would have you believe it is. It's not the second coming of Peanuts in particular; Gownley is writing about essentially authentic kids (though they have a freedom of movement and action that real kids haven't had most places in the US for a generation or more, or never really had except in stories), and using them to write about the events in kids' lives. It's more of a book for adults looking back at their childhoods than for current kids, since the iron law of kids' books is that kids only read about people older than they are, and these kids are pretty young. For older grammar-school kids or tweens willing to flout that iron law, though, they could find some very enjoyable comics stories.


British Science Fiction Association Awards

Far away from Norwescon, another SFnal group was giving away its own awards -- the British Science Fiction Association, during Eastercon (in lovely Bradford, UK).

And those awards are:
I have no borderline-smutty things to say about these awards, but congratulations to the winners anyway.

Two Dicks Awarded This Year!

Over the weekend, at Norwescon 32, the 2008 Philip K. Dick Award (for distinguished original science fiction paperback published for the first time during 2008 in the U.S.A. -- see Wheeler's Law of Hype for commentary on award categorization) was awarded, and this year there was a tie:
Congratulations to both writers for the new, and clearly well-deserved, big Dicks.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

My #Amazonfail Theory

Do I have to explain the background, two days later? (OK, you get two links -- one, two.)

I have no outside knowledge, first of all. (Or inside knowledge, either -- I haven't been at work for two days, so I don't even know what the people in my office are saying about this. And I've mostly been away from the Internet, too, so I've only seen a few of the accounts.) But I do have the ability to believe that Amazon's public statements are all true...more or less, and that they're not necessarily completely true.

So: here's what I think.

1) Amazon does have a system to mark some books as "adult," and thus keep them from coming up in most searches. I don't expect that they intended to apply those tags to major-publisher books (due to not-pissing-off-major-partners reasons), but I imagine they would be quite willing to have the books from small presses -- particularly presses focusing on gay erotica -- categorized that way. And so what they said to Mark Probst might have been exactly correct -- that the books that he published were marked "adult" and put into this semi-visible status.

2) Amazon's final explanation -- see this Seattle Times article -- is more or less correct; someone, somewhere, in the vast Amazon empire, did flip a switch and throw a whole lot of books with "adult" content (as expressed in their categorization meta-data) into the semi-visible status. And Amazon did not in fact intend for that to happen -- it was a conflation of two very different definitions of "adult" content.

3) But I do believe that Amazon has a number of books -- who knows how many? -- in that status as a matter of policy. And they're trying not to focus attention on that fact.

Do They Have House of the Dead In This Arcade?

Yesterday, I reviewed Joseph Patrick Larkin's collection of comics and various other offensive materials, The Arcade of Cruelty, for ComicMix.

Today...that'll have to be a whole post of its own. But I'm back, even if nobody knew I was gone.

Monday, April 13, 2009

Reviewing The Mail: Week of 4/11

I do this every week, so I'll try to keep the preliminaries brief this time: I get a lot of books in the mail for review, and only manage to read a fraction of them. But I want to mention them all, so I do posts every Monday morning listing everything that came in the week before, with some notes about those books, depending on my time, knowledge, and inclination.

This week I have the usual stuff, and then a pretty big box of things all from one publisher that might take a bit of explaining -- but let me get through the main list first.

First is Edward Willett's third novel for DAW, Terra Insegura, which is also a sequel to his last novel, Marseguro. It's publishing in mass-market in May, and I don't know much more about it than that -- other than the back cover copy, which explains the plot of Marseguro (so I recommend not looking too closely if you intend to read the first book first) and sends most of what I think are the main characters on a path back to Earth, some of them unwittingly carrying a doomsday plague.

Also from DAW in mass-market in the merry month of May is Terribly Twisted Tales, an original anthology of "18 original stories that take familiar fairy tales and shift them around to give them an entirely new slant." Now, that sounds familiar...probably from Jay Ward's Fractured Fairy Tales, if not from Oscar Wilde or something even earlier. (But that's OK; there are no new ideas in the first place.) Among those taking part in this particular exercise are Dennis L. McKiernan, Michael A. Stackpole, Robert E. Vardeman, Jim C. Hines, and several writers who don't feel compelled to shove their middle initial in everywhere they can. (There's also someone credited as 'Ramsey "Tome Wyrm" Lundock,' who get the usual glare over the top of my glasses.)

If you were hoping DAW would give you a paperback with a bit more heft -- something that could startle a good-size cat if flung -- then you're in luck, since they put out Tad Williams's Shadowplay in April. It's solidly over seven hundred pages, it has a golden castle on the cover, and it's the second book in a trilogy -- I can state without fear of contradiction that we have an epic fantasy here. (Not that I didn't know that already.)

Pati Nagle's The Betrayal looks to be a first novel, from Del Rey on March 24th. (So it'll be in stores already, though the shelves may be getting depleted by this point.) The cover hovers somewhere in the triangular space defined by urban fantasy (one woman, looking tough), historical romance (depicted in sumptuous clothes and a sultry look), and high fantasy (that castle floating in the background, and the lack of a clinch or tramp stamp to throw it definitively into one of the other two categories). From the back-cover copy, this is a secondary world fantasy, set among elves (sorry, aelven) and focused on two young lovers with a legendary, unlikely gift -- indeed, the most typical of unlikely gifts -- mindspeech.

Marjane Satrapi's fourth graphic novel (if you count the two parts of Persepolis separately), Chicken with Plums, has just hit paperback, in an April edition from Pantheon that looks entirely different from the hardcover (which I reviewed back in late October of 2006).

Blood of Ambrose is another first novel, as far as I can tell, from James Enge. The set-up follows some well-marked paths, with some kind of complicated dynastic struggle involving a nasty older "Protector" and a young King. (But also an emperor who died a few centuries ago, and whose throne the King is somehow heir to -- and the Protector is the brother-in-law of the guy who's been dead for a few centuries, which either makes him or his wife really, really old.) It has quotes from Greg Keyes, Dave Freer, and Paul Cornell, for those who like arguments from authority, and a stylish cover, for those swayed by such things. It's published by Pyr, and hit bookstores on April 7th in trade paperback.

If you were both a Goth and in the market for an etiquette guide -- and let's just assume, for the moment, that you are both of those things -- you'd probably want a book just like Gothic Charm School, by a woman who can refer to herself as "The Lady of the Manners" with a straight face. (Her actual by-line is Jillian Venters.) It explains who Goths are, how one becomes a Goth, and how to be both filled with darkest ennui at the entire universe and polite. And Harper is publishing it in trade paperback on June 23rd.

Starfinder is the first book in a new series called "Skylords," by John Marco, who is responsible for two previous epic fantasy trilogies. This one looks to be an atypical fantasy, with steampunky ornithopter-like "dragonflies," whatever that vaguely dragon-looking thing on the cover is, at least one blimp, a city on top of a mountain, a legendary order of long-dead knights, and the requisite thirteen-year-old boy hero. It's billed as for teens and adults, and Starfinder will be published by DAW in hardcover on May 5th.

I try to keep up with webcomics, I really do. But, like everything else on the Internet, it's like drinking from a firehouse, and so I know I miss a lot of stuff -- probably more than I see, actually. One of the online strips I hadn't even heard of before is Goats, which is popular and strong enough to have turned into a book from Del Rey, Goats: Infinite Typewriters, which is only the first of three Goats books Del Rey will be doing. Infinite Typewriters is coming in July, with an introduction from "Tycho Brahe" (the webcomic one, not the one with the silver nose).

That's the end of the regular mail, and now we get to the Big Box. The Big Oni Box, actually. I think this was sent to me more as an Eisner judge -- though it was sent, and I received it, the week after I came back from the weekend of judging -- than as a reviewer, but I'll still cover as much of it as I can. From this point on, these are all things published by Oni Press in 2008.

The Apocalipstix, by Ray Fawkes and Cameron Stewart, is an original graphic novel for which the elevator pitch would be "Mad Max meets Josie and the Pussycats" -- it's about a three-girl band traveling through the post-apocalyptic landscape.

North World Book 1 is a webcomic by Lars Brown, and it's also now a book. It's got talking bears and guys with swords in it, so it's got to be good.

I also have here the first two volumes of Saltwater Taffy -- The Legend of Old Salty and A Climb up Mt. Barnabus -- both by Matthew Loux and both suitable for younger readers. They're about two brothers whose family dragged them away for a summer-long vacation in coastal Maine.

Jim Massey and Robbi Rodriguez are responsible for the series Maintenance, which has just hit a third volume, Fighting Occupants of Interstellar Craft. As far as I can tell, those guys on the cover are the custodians at TerroMax, Inc., which is probably some kind of evil corporation.

Speaking of later volumes in series, I also have here Wet Moon Volume 4: Drowned in Evil by Ross Campbell, who also did Water Baby for DC's Minx imprint last year, which I reviewed quickly a couple of weeks ago. There's no actual explanation of the book anywhere I can discern; I guess I'd have to read the book to know what it's about -- the characters do seem to be young and punky, for whatever that's worth.

I take every opportunity I can to mention that I knew Greg Rucka at college, because that's just the kind of obnoxious name-dropper I am. And so I'll use that as a lead-in to mention Oni's reprinting of Rucka's Queen & Country series (with various artists over the years) in their "Definitive Editions." Volumes Two and Three came out last year, and I'm looking at them right now -- they each reprint two or three of the storylines from the comic, and they're very attractive-looking books in their own right.

I also have a stack of honest-to-God pamphlet comics from Oni,which I'd nearly given up on myself. (My main comic boxes are now buried under other things in the basement, so if I had kept buying comics, I'd eventually have to dig out those boxes to integrate the new stuff -- and that was just too much to bear.)

There's a three-issue horror series called The Damned by Cullen Bunn and Brian Hurtt. And the second and third issues of Stephen Colbert's Tek Jansen, by various hands. And #s 14 through 22 of Wasteland by Antony Johnson and Joe Infurnari, which is either post-apocalyptic or horror or both.

I'm not sure if Courtney Crumrin and the Prince of Nowhere counts as a comic or a graphic novel -- it's squarebound, but the size of a comic and only fifty-four pages long. Whatever it is, it's by Ted Naifeh, and I hear this Courtney person is quite popular among certain circles. (Possibly the same ones that need the etiquite book I mentioned above.)

And last from Oni is a book I want to spend some more time with, both because it looks great and because I've heard good things about it -- Local, by Brian Wood and Ryan Kelly, which collects a twelve-issue series about a peripatetic young woman.

Sunday, April 12, 2009

Out-of-Context Things I Have Written

I'm going to claim the lack of a real post from me today is due to the Easter holiday, and not to my own laziness and lack of organization -- and can any of you prove me wrong? So I'm digging into the archives again, for something very miscellaneous and odd.

These snippets are all from the Straight Dope Message Board, and most were posts of their own, over a period of many years. The Management makes no claims as to their accuracy:
As a general rule, there is enough X in the world to make a cube Y feet on each side, or to form a stack as high as Z.
I don't really care which fairy tale I'm in, but I sure as hell want to make sure I'm the third brother!
Well, your woolly mammoth generally carries more firepower than the average giant squid -- at least a dozen shrapnel grenades and some sort of machine gun (depending on his regiment), as well as either a flame-thrower or a backpack-mounted missile launcher. Squid, on the other hand, are more likely to be equipped with non-projectile weapons (such as ceramic daggers and garrotes -- squid are much prized as assassins).

So, in a fair firefight, you've got to give the mammoth the edge. He's got more ammo and a better supply chain. But if the fight is in an urban setting, or the combatants don't start within line-of-sight, the squid's ninja training will allow him to cleanly kill the mammoth without much trouble.
Well, my pet tax is the Stamp Act. Such a cute iddle thing, and almost housebroken, too!
HEY!!Lesbian anal dildo bondage is every red-blooded American's god-given right!

(Is this the point where I should tell about the sex shop here in lovely midtown Manhattan that had neon signs on either side of the door -- presumably to cover the porn spectrum -- with inadvertently funny porn juxtapositions?

One was "Amateur European Bondage Magazines" ("Oh Lars, take me now!" "Wait, Helga, I have to turn to page 75 to see how to untie this knot!")

The other was "Oriental Lesbian Rubber Goods," which brought to my mind the world's smallest double-dong.
And I didn't go to high school in West Bumfuck, Wisconsin, but I do have a degree in TV repair from a mail order school headquartered there.
Posted 3/16/00:
OK, so how many of us didn't get assassinated in the Forum yesterday?

Me, for one.
So, if it's purely a matter of nomenclature, could, say, The State of New York change its official title to The Most High and Holy Royal Duchy of New York and Albany Plantations tomorrow?
Oh, I too fondly remember the 80s!

The ash from Vesuvius had settled, and the beaches in the south were gorgeous again. The lazy days in the just-finished Coliseum, watching lions devour Christians. The early days of Domitian, before the reign of terror..ah, those were the days! Rome was the only place to be in the 80s. I remember getting drunk on sweet Cretan wine at the opening of the Arch of Titus: was I ever so young!
Insert obligatory comment about plot here.

Saturday, April 11, 2009

Saturday Is Bond Day #5: You Only Live Twice

I'm a week late writing about You Only Live Twice -- the boys and I watched the next movie this very afternoon -- so I'll be brief, and make this post mostly for the sake of symmetry.

This is the one where Bond's death is faked before the opening credits, where we finally see the face of Ernst Stavros Blofeld (in a scarred Donald Pleasance), and where we learn that even ninjas are no match for 007. It also continues the SPECTRE plot, which has been bubbling along since the first movie, Doctor No -- though its focused down to a Bond vs. Blofeld showdown at this point.

So: Bond is officially dead, and so Bond goes to Japan to find out what happened to an American space capsule (which was captured within a mysterious spaceship, which then disappeared somewhere in the Japan Sea). Of course it's SPECTRE and Blofeld, fomenting a US-Soviet war in order to pick up the pieces afterward, and of course Bond leads a team of ninjas to attack the SPECTRE base and foil the nefarious plot -- but he has to get involved with a couple of girls first!

You Only Live Twice has excellent action sequences, and one of the quintessential Bond villains in Pleasance's Blofeld -- it's just a shame that Pleasance and Connery didn't stick around for the next movie, since their replacements were much less exciting.

The True Story of G.B.H. Hornswoggler

It's a Saturday, and I haven't found time to finish up any blog posts for today -- and that means another post resurrected from the files of the Straight Dope Message Board; this one was from a thread about what people's names actually meant.

It's my real name. The initials stand for George Bertram Herbert.

No, actually it was the name of a famous riverboat gambler in the 1840s, whose exploits I discovered while working on the suppressed memoirs of James G. Blaine.

Sorry, little joke there. It's really the name of the secret agent who poisoned Edgar Allen Poe in 1849 so that Poe wouldn't reveal the true secrets of the Hollow Earth. Poe's secret manuscript turned up about a dozen years ago, and my employer sent me to verify its provenance. I met Hornswoggler's great grand-nephew (once removed), and his old family tales of derring-do in Pellucidar (old G.B.H. didn't call it that, of course, but you couldn't mistake the dinosaurs) made a great impression on me.

I kid you folks. Hornswoggler was actually the roguish hero of a picaresque novel written by T.F.X. Tumblethwacket and published by Lathrop, Ward and Fortescue in 1877. I first encountered his adventures in old copies of the Illustrated Young Men's Journal and Gazetter, translated into Serbo-Croatian and rendered as comics stories by the inimitable Xerxes F. Xerxes. For months afterwards, I would speak only in my own crude re-translations of Hornswoggler's hilarious phrases, such as "Great Yak of Burma, mind the butter!" and "If I'd wanted to purchase spats from a railway yard, I would certainly not have begun my journey in Oshkosh." Even now, the mere repetition of "The squirrel is on the hunt!" can send me into uncontrollable guffaws.

I'm sorry for leading you astray...

Friday, April 10, 2009

Aha! That's What the Controversy Is This Time!

I've been through the judging-an-award mill once before myself, as well as being an observer and kibitzer for many other awards over the years, so I knew that every shortlist -- no matter what award it's for -- will create a controversy. I just didn't know, until now, what the controversy would be for this year's Eisners. (And how major it would be.)

There was a brief flirtation with "Todd Klein was robbed," but that turned out not to be it. [1]

No, the real controversy is that we "ignored" manga. (Heidi MacDonald at The Beat has a good summary, and links to several people who raised the issue, semi-independently.) I'm not sure if there's any reasonable case to be made that we shunned Japanese comics entirely -- besides the possibly-ghettoizing "Best U.S. Edition of International Material - Japan" category, we placed manga projects in "Best Continuing Series," "Best Publication for Kids" and "Best Archival Collection/Project - Comic Books," which to my eye would look even to an outsider like we were considering manga projects across a wide range of categories. (As, indeed, we were.)

Much of this probably comes down to taste -- the five of us certainly didn't entirely agree on what were the best works in any category, so there's no reason to expect the rest of the world will agree with our gestalt choices. The nominees reflect our consensus of what the best work of last year was, in those category-defined areas, and we did see many (if not all) of the alternative manga suggestions that I've seen.

I do wonder if there's a selection bias at work here, too -- if the best thing you're familiar with doesn't get onto an award ballot, then that ballot is going to look lousy in your eyes...as long as you continue assuming that you already know what the best is. And I definitely get the impression from some of the comments that there are people who wouldn't have been satisfied unless the list of nominees were half, or more, manga. (Though I imagine that particular outcome would have led to a different controversy.) That could happen, some day -- but this particular panel, looking at the works from this particular year, didn't see it that way.

What I'd love to see, and haven't seen yet -- though someone might have done it already -- is a listing of what manga projects that missed the final ballot should have been on it -- 1) slotted into in a particular category in which they're eligible, and 2) specifying which other nominated item should have missed the ballot because of them. Here's the ballot, if anyone wants to try.

It's easy to list great stuff; it's much harder to cut those lists down to about five items in specific, defined categories. Not having tried to keep track of the whole universe of comics in any one year before, I can't say whether 2008 was a strong year among other strong years, or an outstandingly strong year -- but there were a boat-load of very good books last year, and about a shelf's worth of excellent ones.

Tell you what, I'll start, at least halfway. I really loved Hideo Azuma's Disappearance Diary last year, and was one of the ones supporting it in the "Best Reality-Based Work" category. (On the other hand, I wasn't as thrilled by Osamu Tezuka's Black Jack -- despite its manic energy and deeply nutty plots -- as much as I was by his Dororo, which was also published last year.)

Another issue is the difference between discrete books -- like Skim and Alan's War and COWA! and Swallow Me Whole -- and ongoing serials, like most manga and most Marvel/DC projects. A single story has a shape and unity that a serial can't touch; the serial's strengths are in novelty and excitement. When comparing the middle of one set of stories to another set of stories that have beginnings, middles, and ends, the pure-middle stories will inevitably come off worse. That affects things like Thor (which was a really gripping story, but what came out in 2008 was entirely middle) as much as manga, and I think it's inevitable. The best time to honor particularly strong manga (and superhero series, and other long-form works) is probably either when they begin, and are new and fresh, or when they end, and can be seen as a successful whole. (Monster fits that bill well, since it ended its story in 2008.)

I have seen some people calling for the Eisners to have more categories, which sends a shudder down my spine -- we cut the list down to twenty-six, combining or eliminating three categories, because we thought it was already too huge and sprawling. But there's always next year -- those judges will have the power to combine or add as they see fit, and it's completely reasonable for people who love manga to call for more categories to honor the great work being done in that area. I'm just glad I only had to deal with twenty-six categories...


[1] I'm very flippant here, but I want to emphasize that Klein is a fine letterer who's done tons of excellent work in comics for a long, long time. The judging panel this year believed that some other letterers were doing really exceptional work right now, but that doesn't take anything away from his skill and professionalism.

Quote of the Week

"To write books is so easy, it requires only pen and ink and the ever-present paper. To print books is a little more difficult, because genius so often rejoices in illegible handwriting. To read books is more difficult still, because of the tendency to go to sleep. But the most difficult task of all that mortal man can embark on is to sell a book."
- as attributed to Felix Dahn in Only in Books (a very similar wording of the same sentiments is attributed to Frank Arthur Mumby in the same book)

Thursday, April 09, 2009

Movie Log: Quantum of Solace

If I were really, really anal-retentive, I'd have saved this movie up to be "Saturday Is James Bond Day #22," but I'm not -- and, besides, I think my kids are only going to see the movies up to the end of Roger Moore this time around.

So The Wife and I saw Quantum of Solace by ourselves -- though I have to say that both boys noticed we had the movie and showed interest in seeing it. (If they had seen it, though, I doubt they'd have wanted to see a Bond movie ever again -- this one is adult in the least interesting ways and manages to make Bond dull.)

I chose this particular product shot for two reasons: one, because Daniel Craig's head is so poorly composited onto that generic body, and, two, because The Wife noted specifically during the movie that Bond never uses automatic weapons. (And she surely wasn't the only one to notice that.) Photoshop can be so dangerous in the wrong hands, can't it?

Quantum of Solace looks like a giant pile of wasted opportunities to me, from beginning to end. After rebooting the series with Casino Royale -- which was a little self-indulgent with the parkour, and made other changes to the novel for silly reasons, but was a solid thriller movie and basically accurate to Fleming -- Broccoli & Co. could easily have slid right into Live and Let Die and continued their string. Instead, they picked one of the last few remaining unused Fleming titles (left unused for a reason, along with unsuitable titles like "Property of a Lady" and "Risico"), grabbed an off-the-shelf supervillain plot on special at Kmart, threw in an uninspiring villain, and let it all sit until tepid.

Bond spends the entire movie sulking over the girl who died at the end of the last movie, retroactively sullying Casino Royale by reminding us that it ended the wrong way but still making us wish we were still watching that movie instead of this one. There's also an equally sullen Bond girl (Olga Kurylenko), whom he doesn't even bother to try to sleep with. I'm pretty sure that Craig can act if allowed to, but the entirety of his direction in Quantum seems to have been "Scowl. OK, scowl harder. Furrow your brow....now, scowl again."

The effects sequences are well-staged, and things blow up nicely; it's not a boring movie. But it is an intensely dull one, which rises to self-parody once the audience realizes that the evil scheme of the fiendish Quantum organization is to corner the water market in Bolivia...by building secret dams half a mile from town and hoping no one notices. (The undertones are particularly unsubtle as well -- every time the pseudo-eco-friendly villains come back on, it's like having a repeated Rush Limbaugh elbow in the side -- yes, I get it, Cubby or whoever, you think global warming is bunk. Now go back to your villa to count some more money.)

There have been worse Bond movies than this -- there may even have been duller and more tedious ones, since I haven't seen any of the Dalton or Brosnan films -- but I'd hold Quantum of Solace up against anyone's turgid, pointless thriller.

Movie Log: Monsters Vs. Aliens

The boys have been good, so I decided to take them out to a movie Tuesday night -- well, actually, I thought that I wanted to see Monsters Vs. Aliens as well (though it turned out that I was mistaken), so we were all in agreement. Along the way, a neighbor boy -- one of Thing 2's best friends -- attached himself to our party, probably mostly because he's one boy with three sisters and his father has been traveling a lot for business lately.

Anyway, Monsters Vs. Aliens is in the very intrusive kind of 3-D that I haven't seen for a while; a bored computer nerd bounces one of those red tethered paddle-balls out of the screen within the first two minutes just to prove to us how intrusive it will be. And it goes on in that vein: obvious and a bit tedious, and rarely as funny as it thinks it is.

There's nothing in particular that Monsters Vs. Aliens does well, except for being a big, loud, splashy extravaganza. The 3-D effects are intrusive and obvious, unlike the immersive and mesmerizing Coraline. The plot is dull and plodding, hitting standard mark after cliche after tired trope. (It's Kids's Movie Plot #2: someone Gets Different, and is shunned by the wider world for that difference, but falls into the Different Group and eventually not only Embraces the Difference but uses it to Save the World.) The dialogue is similarly uninspiring -- Seth Rogen (as the Blob-like B.O.B.) comes the closest to injecting life into the exercise, but even his energy can't lift this bloated carcass.

Monsters Vs. Aliens is a movie made around a title and a technique (3-D), rather than being based in any story or idea. It's pleasant to look at, but even the big battles aren't all that exciting. I'd much rather just watch The Incredibles again -- especially if I could see it in this 3-D process on a big screen.

I see I've forgotten to mention the plot. Well, Susan (Reese Witherspoon) is an ordinary girl about to get married to the local weatherman in Modesto, California, when she's whacked by a falling meteor and quickly starts glowing and then growing, to a height of about fifty feet. The authorities of course appear immediately to spirit her away to the secret government lab where she is to spend the rest of her days, where she meets the other Misfit Toysmonsters. But then an alien probe, sent to get the stuff that juiced up Susan, appears, and the monsters are the only thing that can fight it. Blah blah blah, success in battle but shunned by normal people. Blah blah blah, sad in the desert at night. Blah blah blah, alien conqueror and big battle in the end.

(It doesn't quite have an idiot plot, but it does have a Jerk Plot -- if the alien conqueror dude just came down and asked Susan nicely for the mutating stuff, without sending a killer robot first, I'm sure she'd have been happy to give it to him. Thus the plot only works because he's a jerk -- because he knows he's the villain and acts appropriately.)

So Monsters Vs. Aliens is a dim-witted piece of off-the-shelf hackwork, with nothing original or thoughtful in it at all. And the action scenes aren't even all that great. Unless you also need to see a movie with three boys between the ages of eight and eleven, as I did, I'd suggest you skip it.

McAuley's Old Particular Fantasy & Horror

Paul McAuley had a list of essential SF last week, so now he's trying to do the same for Fantasy and Horror. And so, again, I'll treat it as a meme.

The usual rules: bold books read, italicize books on the shelf to be read, strikethrough books violently disputed.

(I expect to be less well-read on this list than the first one; let's see if that's true.)
  • Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus MARY SHELLEY 1818
  • Tales of Mystery and Imagination EDGAR ALLAN POE 1838
    Don't think I ever read the book with that precise title, but I did read all of Poe's fiction and poetry for my college thesis, so I'm counting it.
  • A Christmas Carol CHARLES DICKENS 1843
    I may have read this at some point, but I'm not sure -- and I have a copy on the shelf, which I've intended to read for the past four or five Christmases.
  • Jane Eyre CHARLOTTE BRONTE 1847
    Agree with its importance to world literature, without liking it much, but disagree that it's one of the fifty essential fantasy/horror novels of all time. That deforms "horror" more than I'm comfortable with.
  • The Hunting of the Snark LEWIS CARROLL 1876
  • Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde ROBERT LOUIS STEPHENSON 1886
  • The Well At The World’s End WILLIAM MORRIS 1896
  • Dracula BRAM STOKER 1897
  • Ghost Stories of an Antiquary MR JAMES 1904
  • Kwaidan: Stories and Studies of Strange Things LAFCADIO HEARN 1904
  • The Wind in the Willows KENNETH GRAHAME 1908
  • Jurgen JAMES BRANCH CABELL 1919
  • A Voyage to Arcturus DAVID LINDSAY 1920
  • The King of Elfland’s Daughter LORD DUNSANY 1924
  • The Trial FRANZ KAFKA 1925
  • Lud-in-the-Mist HOPE MIRRLEES 1926
  • Orlando VIRGINIA WOOLF 1928
  • The Big Sleep RAYMOND CHANDLER 1939
    For fantasy? Or horror? I must respectfully disagree.
  • The Outsider and Others HP LOVECRAFT 1939
    Again, not as such, but I've read all of Lovecraft's fiction at least twice.
  • Gormenghast MERVYN PEAKE 1946
  • Night’s Black Agents FRITZ LEIBER JR 1947
    Another book that I've read all the bits of, but not the book in itself. I doubt anyone has in forty years, either, though the stories are important.
  • The Sword of Rhiannon LEIGH BRACKETT 1953
  • Conan the Barbarian ROBERT E HOWARD collected 1954
  • The Lord of the Rings JRR TOLKEIN 1954-5
  • The Once and Future King TH WHITE 1958
  • The Haunting of Hill House SHIRLEY JACKSON 1959
  • The Wierdstone of Brinsingamen ALAN GARNER 1960
  • The Wolves of Willoughby Chase JOAN AIKEN 1962
  • Something Wicked This Way Comes RAY BRADBURY 1963
  • The Book of Imaginary Beings JORGE LUIS BORGES 1967
  • Ice ANA CAVAN 1967
  • One Hundred Years of Solitude GABRIEL GARCIA MARQUEZ 1967
  • Earthsea URSULA LE GUIN 1968-1972
  • Jirel of Joiry CL MOORE collected 1969
  • Grendel JOHN GARDNER 1971
  • The Pastel City M JOHN HARRISON 1971
  • Carrie STEPHEN KING 1974
  • Peace GENE WOLFE 1975
  • Gloriana, or the Unfulfill’d Queen MICHAEL MOORCOCK 1978
  • The Bloody Chamber and Other Stories ANGELA CARTER 1979
    I've read at least one Angela Carter collection, long ago, and have since forgotten which one it was. I didn't much like it then, but I should probably take another run at her work at some point.
  • Little, Big JOHN CROWLEY 1981
  • The Anubis Gates TIM POWERS 1983
  • The Colour of Magic TERRY PRATCHETT 1983
  • Mythago Wood ROBERT HOLDSTOCK 1984
I should also note that I did a similar list myself a couple of years ago, in response to a list from Jeff VanderMeer that was specifically aimed at writers of literary fantasy.

And I do come out worse on this one than the SF list -- I've read 25 of 44, and intend to read a half-dozen more. But I also find this list much more idiosyncratic, so that just comes with the territory.

Panic! edited by Michael Lewis

I'm sure many of us, on first glance at this book, thought "Oh good -- Michael Lewis is smart and savvy about financial stuff and a fine writer; he'll be able to explain why the markets are in such a mess." And then we looked closer and realized that this is not a new book by Lewis about this panic (or any other), but instead a collection of writings edited by Lewis about the last four major global financial panics.

Once our expectations were appropriately adjusted, though, Panic! starts to look quite good again -- it covers the 1987 Wall Street crash, the 1997-98 Asian currency crisis, the popping of the dot-com bubble, and the early stages of whatever the heck we should call the current debacle, has been very intelligently curated to provide valuable perspectives on all of those events, and does have quite a bit of Lewis prose in it, to explain and introduce and tie together all of these materials.

The whole thing is, somewhat improbably, half-copyright to McSweeney's, and Lewis's acknowledgements explain that the project is a benefit for 826 National and for a fund for rebuilding New Orleans -- both excellent causes, though I'm a little fuzzy on how they relate to the subject of financial panics.

As I said above, Panic! covers the last four major crashes, starting with the 1987 event called "Black Monday" until last fall showed us all what a really crashing market looks like. Lewis has pulled articles from the usual financial-reporting suspects -- the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Barron's, Economist, Fortune, Time -- as well as pulling chapters from books by John Cassidy (Dot.con), Franklin Edwards (After the Crash), Lewis's own work (both Liar's Poker and The New New Thing, plus several of his journalistic pieces), Tim Metz (Black Monday), and, of all people, Dave Barry (Dave Barry's Money Secrets). Other reporters and commentators with work in the book include Paul Krugman, Roger Lowenstein, James Surowiecki, and Peter Goodman.

I learned a lot from this book, though I'm afraid I didn't know enough about any of these events ahead of time to be sure if this is book is fully accurate, or if it embodies any kind of an agenda. It certainly seems authoritative, and I mostly trust Lewis -- though he's presenting one essentially unified explanation for each crisis, and I'm sure that there are competing theories, even now. So I liked Panic!, and found it very useful and informative, but I might have liked it better if I had a clearer idea of its biases and the general shape of the different explanations of the crashes.

Wednesday, April 08, 2009

Sulking About Little Things

Today for ComicMix I reviewed three books by Jeffrey Brown -- Little Things, Sulk Volume 1, and Sulk Volume 2 -- all of which were published in 2008.

Quote of the Day

"If you don't want me to kill Loki, don't tell me how many hit points he has. It's as simple as that."
- Teague Bohlen, Topless Robot

Movie Log: Synecdoche, NY

I don't know if it's fair to call me a Charlie Kaufman fan, but he's certainly one of the most interesting and vital writers working in movies today, so I did catch up with Synecdoche, NY recently.

It's more than a bit messy and confused, and doesn't entirely work -- it doesn't work at all if you try to think of it as literally true, rather than as a concretized metaphor -- but it definitely has a power and energy to it. And once you hit the scene where a real estate agent shows a house that's on fire, you'll realize that you can't take it entirely seriously.

Philip Seymour Hoffman plays a minor provincial dramatist, putting on productions of old warhorses like Death of a Salesman in Schnectady, but he's married to painter Catherine Keener, whose career is just taking off. So she takes off, for Europe, and mostly disappears from the movie (which has a very uneasy relationship with the passing of time -- it senses that time does pass, but would prefer that things generally don't take that into account).

Hoffman then receives a MacArthur "genius" grant -- which is unlikely enough -- and starts to think about using it to create his magnum opus. Before long, he moves down to New York City (to a warehouse somewhere in Brooklyn, as far as I can tell) to begin rehearsals for a play about his own life. But the play, the characters, and the sets keep proliferating as Hoffman keeps trying to incorporate more and more of the materials of his life into the play, and eventually he seems to be trying to recreate an entire city -- the entire, actually existing city.

(Actually, the rehearsal bits show that he's still entirely focused on himself, which I presume means that all of the hundreds or thousands of other actors are only important to the play inasmuch as they interact with the character based on Hoffman.)

Along the way, Hoffman has various strange health problems, which proliferate, and various misshapen relationships with the women in his life, who also proliferate. Every so often, he remembers that he had a daughter with Keener, and tries to find or retrieve her, without luck.

All of Hoffman's life is "without luck," of course. This is the tragedy of the artist: he fails at life, and he fails at turning that life into art, by spending what the movie claims is several decades rehearsing his ever-more-complex piece of theater until disaster strikes before the never-to-be-reached opening day. That is an awfully self-indulgent theme for a work of popular art in a form not all that far removed from live theater, but Synecdoche, NY is so layered and obsessed with itself that it fails to punch its theme strongly, and thus sell it more effectively.

This isn't an easy movie, to like or to understand. Pieces of it are exceptional; pieces of it make hardly any sense at all. But it's a must for those who have enjoyed the movies that Kauffman wrote before this, like Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Adaptation, and Being John Malkovich. And we can hope that he'll manage to bring his screenplay ideas into focus as well as the other directors did on those movies.

Nine Jobs Lost at NavPress

The evangelical Christian publisher NavPress has eliminated nine positions and closed down their two magazines in a reorganization that splits their operations into trade and direct publishing groups, Publishers Weekly reports.

Wishful Drinking by Carrie Fisher

Carrie Fisher has been many things in her life: bestselling novelist, famous actress, famous child of an actress, metal-bikini pinup, recovering addict. Wishful Drinking is a prose decanting of her one-woman stage show of the same name; I haven't seen the latter, though I suspect it's shorter than the book is. (Since even just reading this short book aloud would make for a very long evening of theater.)

I read this book because it has one of the world's most perfect pull-quotes, which the New York Times Book Review smartly mentioned in their review. George Lucas wouldn't let Fisher wear a bra under that blousy white outfit from Star Wars, because -- as the director explained -- "there's no underwear in space." (The full details are on p.88; Fisher complied but had to use gaffer's tape instead, which seems to have led to some competition among the technical crew to be the ones to aid her with her wardrobe.) Lucas either was very devious -- in devising an insane but superficially plausible reason to have a bouncier, jigglier leading lady to tantalize his audiences -- or very stupid, and I'm sure fan arguments over that are raging somewhere on the 'Net.

Fisher is an engaging writer, though it's probably even more entertaining to see her tell these stories than it is to read them, and she's clear-eyed about how messed up she was in her addict years. She also glancingly touches on the perennial issue of growing up rich, famous, and privileged in Hollywood, which always tantalizes the 99% of us who weren't.

It's a short book, and it's not a full memoir by any means; she covers the high points of her life, as she sees them, but it's more about "how Carrie Fisher came to be so messed up and how she found her way back out again, more or less." So her mother, Debbie Reynolds, is in it here and there, and so is her husband Paul Simon, and her other husband, who left her for a man, and the guy who died unexpected in her bed a few years back, and so on.

It's a quick read, and not an embarrassing one, as the memoirs of a thousand other stars-of-the-hour have been. It's not a book for the ages, but it's a fine book for an day or so.

Tuesday, April 07, 2009

Movie Log: Role Models

Role Models is very funny, and even has a socially redeeming message, if you squint at it very hard. All of the actors in it are good at what they do, and that "McLovin" kid (Christopher Mintz-Plasse, he added, after looking it up) in particular could have a great career ahead of him if he can avoid being typecast as his generation's young Anthony Edwards. (On the other hand, that's not a bad career to emulate; the man keeps working.)

Paul Rudd and Seann William Scott -- the men with two many double consonants in their names -- work for an energy drink company, doing school visits to get teenagers to buy their company's vile swill. One day, Rudd's high-powered lawyer girlfriend (Elizabeth Banks) dumps him, and disaster follows on the job. The two miscreants are thus sentenced to a massive number of community service hours, which much be served at the (unseen) judge's favorite charity, a thinly veiled version of Big Brothers.

Scott's "little" is a black kid with a foul mouth; Rudd's is a LARP-obsessed pasty bespectacled teenage white boy. (No stereotyping there, no sir!) And the plot chugs along the expected path for about another eighty minutes, until everyone learns to respect and like each other and our heroes are all triumphant. But, since I did find Role Models to be very funny, I didn't mind at all. Humor is famously subjective, but I found Role Models to be consistently hilarious (as did The Wife), and so I'm moderately confident that people not too different from us will also enjoy it.

Eisner Award Nominees

The Eisner Awards released the official list of nominees for the 2009 awards today; I saw it posted first by Comics Reporter.

Edit, the next day: I've added some thoughts and comments, in italics after nearly every category. Short version: these are some really, really, good things, which I hope more people will search out and read.

And those nominees are:

Best Short Story
  • "Actual Size," by Chris Ware, in Kramers Ergot 7 (Buenaventura Press)
  • "Chechen War, Chechen Women," by Joe Sacco, in I Live Here (Pantheon)
  • "Freaks," by Laura Park, in Superior Showcase #3 (AdHouse)
  • "Glenn Ganges in Pulverize," by Kevin Huizenga, in Ganges #2 (Fantagraphics)
  • "Murder He Wrote," by Ian Boothby, Nina Matsumoto, and Andrew Pepoy, in The Simpsons' Treehouse of Horror #14 (Bongo)
The Chris Ware story particularly impressed me here; it's got all of the formal brilliance his work usually has but also hints of more positive, happy emotions, which is not typical.

Best Continuing Series

  • All Star Superman, by Grant Morrison and Frank Quitely (DC)
  • Fables, by Bill Willingham, Mark Buckingham, Steve Leialoha, Niko Henrichon, Andrew Pepoy, and Peter Gross (Vertigo/DC)
  • Naoki Urasawa's Monster, by Naoki Urasawa (Viz)
  • Thor, by J. Michael Straczynski, Olivier Coipel, Mark Morales, and various (Marvel)
  • Usagi Yojimbo, by Stan Sakai (Dark Horse)
Thor gets my nod as the best thing I was completely surprised by; I didn't have high hopes for mainstream superhero stuff, but it's a layered, complex story with interesting characters and art I actually liked. Maybe I should check out more by that Straczynski guy, huh?

Best Limited Series

  • Groo: Hell on Earth, by Sergio Aragones and Mark Evanier (Dark Horse)
  • Hellboy: The Crooked Man, by Mike Mignola and Richard Corben (Dark Horse)
  • Locke & Key, by Joe Hill and Gabriel Rodriguez (IDW)
  • Omega the Unknown, by Jonathan Lethem, Karl Rusnak, and Farel Dalrymple (Marvel)
  • The Twelve, by J. Michael Straczynski and Chris Weston (Marvel)
I'm beginning to think there's nothing that Joe Hill can't do; Locke & Key was deeply creepy and excellent.

Best New Series

  • Air, by G. Willow Wilson and M. K. Perker (Vertigo/DC)
  • Echo, by Terry Moore (Abstract Studio)
  • Invincible Iron Man, by Matt Fraction and Salvador Larocca (Marvel)
  • Madame Xanadu, by Matt Wagner, Amy Reeder Hadley, and Richard Friend (Vertigo/DC)
  • Unknown Soldier, by Joshua Dysart and Alberto Ponticelli (Vertigo/DC)
Best Publication for Kids
  • Amulet, Book 1: The Stonekeeper, by Kazu Kabuishi (Scholastic Graphix)
  • Cowa!, by Akira Toriyama (Viz)
  • Princess at Midnight, by Andi Watson (Image)
  • Stinky, by Eleanor Davis (RAW Junior)
  • Tiny Titans, by Art Baltazar and Franco (DC)
Aw yeah Titans! All of these are a lot of fun -- and Amulet is deeper and more complex than that -- but Tiny Titans is my sentimental favorite for its silly take on the DC Universe.

Best Publication for Teens/Tweens

  • Coraline, by Neil Gaiman, adapted by P. Craig Russell (HarperCollins Children's Books)
  • Crogan's Vengeance, by Chris Schweizer (Oni)
  • The Good Neighbors, Book 1: Kin, by Holly Black and Ted Naifeh (Scholastic Graphix)
  • Rapunzel's Revenge, by Shannon and Dean Hale and Nathan Hale (Bloomsbury Children's Books)
  • Skim, by Mariko Tamaki and Jillian Tamaki (Groundwood Books)
This is a really strong category, in my humble opinion; there's a lot of great books being published for younger readers these days. And most of these are just as good for most adult readers as well.

Best Humor Publication

  • Arsenic Lullaby Pulp Edition No. Zero, by Douglas Paszkiewicz (Arsenic Lullaby)
  • Chumble Spuzz, by Ethan Nicolle (SLG)
  • Herbie Archives, by "Sean O'Shea" (Richard E. Hughes) and Ogden Whitney (Dark Horse)
  • Petey and Pussy, by John Kerschbaum (Fantagraphics)
  • Wondermark: Beards of Our Forefathers, by David Malki (Dark Horse)
There was only one woman on our panel, and it may show the most in this category, where the rest of us might have overwhelmed her with our enjoyment of horribly funny books like Peter & Pussy. All of these books are really, really funny in their own way, and I'm happy at how diverse and odd this category turned out.

Best Anthology

  • An Anthology of Graphic Fiction, Cartoons, and True Stories, Vol. 2, edited by Ivan Brunetti (Yale University Press)
  • Best American Comics 2008, edited by Lynda Barry (Houghton Mifflin)
  • Comic Book Tattoo: Narrative Art Inspired by the Lyrics and Music of Tori Amos, edited by Rantz Hoseley (Image)
  • Kramers Ergot 7, edited by Sammy Harkham (Buenaventura Press)
  • MySpace Dark Horse Presents, edited by Scott Allie and Sierra Hahn (Dark Horse)
I'm very glad I was an Eisner judge this year; I got to read Kramer's Ergot 7 without having to worry about how to afford (or store) the darn thing myself. It's a monument to comics, in more than one way.

Best Digital Comic

  • Bodyworld, by Dash Shaw
  • Finder, by Carla Speed McNeil
  • The Lady's Murder, by Eliza Frye
  • Speak No Evil: Melancholy of a Space Mexican, by Elan Trinidad
  • Vs., by Alexis Sottile & Joe Infurnari
Speak No Evil is much, much better than that subtitle might lead you to believe. And I really need to take some time and dig back to the beginning of Finder one of these days. I struggled a bit with this category, since my preference in webcomics is gag-a-day stuff, and the Eisner category is explicitly meant to honor works that are more like comic books -- longer-form, usually laid out as pages rather than strips. (So I wasn't as ahead on my reading as I thought at first.)

Best Reality-Based Work

  • Alan's War, by Emmanuel Guibert (First Second)
  • Blue Pills: A Positive Love Story, by Frederik Peeters (Houghton Mifflin)
  • Fishtown, by Kevin Colden (IDW)
  • A Treasury of XXth Century Murder: The Lindbergh Child, by Rick Geary (NBM)
  • What It Is, by Lynda Barry (Drawn & Quarterly)
Another really strong category -- What It Is is an amazing, almost indefinable work, Fishtown is a really powerful true crime story; and I doubt I would have read either of them if not for the Eisners.

Best Graphic Album -- New

  • Alan's War, by Emmanuel Guibert (First Second)
  • Paul Goes Fishing, by Michel Rabagliati (Drawn & Quarterly)
  • Skim, by Mariko Tamaki and Jillian Tamaki (Groundwood Books)
  • Swallow Me Whole, by Nate Powell (Top Shelf)
  • Three Shadows, by Cyril Pedrosa (First Second)
A great, completely overstuffed category, in a great year. We probably could have chosen another five books, only slightly below these five. (And there's one particular book I know many people are suprised not to see here.) Swallow Me Whole in particular is more and more impressive the more I look back at it and think about it.

Best Graphic Album -- Reprint

  • Berlin Book 2: City of Smoke, by Jason Lutes (Drawn & Quarterly)
  • Hellboy Library Edition, Vols. 1-2, by Mike Mignola (Dark Horse)
  • Sam & Max Surfin' the Highway Anniversary Edition HC, by Steve Purcell (Telltale Games)
  • Skyscrapers of the Midwest, by Joshua W. Cotter (AdHouse)
  • The Umbrella Academy, Vol. 1: Apocalypse Suite, deluxe edition, by Gerard Way and Gabriel Ba (Dark Horse)
This category is for the package almost as much as the content, and it's another one with interesting juxtapositions of material. It was great to see Sam & Max come back into print -- great funny stories in a wonderful package. And Skyscrapers of the Midwest is, for me, easily one of the best books of the year.

Best Archival Collection/Project -- Strips

  • The Complete Little Orphan Annie, by Harold Gray (IDW)
  • Explainers, by Jules Feiffer (Fantagraphics)
  • Little Nemo in Slumberland, Many More Splendid Sundays, by Winsor McCay (Sunday Press Books)
  • Scorchy Smith and the Art of Noel Sickles (IDW)
  • Willie & Joe, by Bill Mauldin (Fantagraphics)
Another category full of great stuff, led by the absolutely stunning Willie & Joe (which looks better the closer you examine it; it's not only a great collection of important cartoons, but a lovingly designed book with a very appropriate design sense). Explainers is also a wonderful package of a toweringly important work.

Best Archival Collection/Project -- Comic Books

  • Breakdowns: Portrait of the Artist as a Young %@&*!, by Art Spiegelman (Pantheon)
  • Creepy Archives, by Various (Dark Horse)
  • Elektra Omnibus, by Frank Miller and Bill Sienkiewicz (Marvel)
  • Good-Bye, by Yoshihiro Tatsumi (Drawn & Quarterly)
  • Herbie Archives, by "Sean O'Shea" (Richard E. Hughes) and Ogden Whitney (Dark Horse)
Another category that shows the bredth of what's being published today, all in great, carefully-designed packages.

Best U.S. Edition of International Material

  • Alan's War, by Emmanuel Guibert (First Second)
  • Gus and His Gang, by Chris Blain (First Second)
  • The Last Musketeer, by Jason (Fantagraphics)
  • The Rabbi's Cat 2, by Joann Sfar (Pantheon)
  • Tamara Drewe, by Posy Simmonds (Mariner/Houghton Mifflin)
There's a lot of amazing work coming across the Atlantic these days, and I'm glad there's a category like this to honor it. This also reminds me that I really need to read more of Jason's work.

Best U.S. Edition of International Material -- Japan

  • Cat Eyed Boy, by Kazuo Umezu (Viz)
  • Dororo, by Osamu Tezuka (Vertical)
  • Naoki Urasawa's Monster, by Naoki Urasawa (Viz)
  • The Quest for the Missing Girl, by Jiro Taniguchi (Fanfare/Ponent Mon)
  • Solanin, by Inio Asano (Viz)
And we all know about the flood of manga -- most of it is entertaining but not particularly ambitious, but the fact of the flood has allowed quirkier, odder things to be translated and widely known as well.

Best Writer

  • Joe Hill, Locke & Key (IDW)
  • J. Michael Straczynski, Thor, The Twelve (Marvel)
  • Mariko Tamaki, Skim (Groundwood Books)
  • Matt Wagner, Zorro (Dynamite); Madame Xanadu (Vertigo/DC)
  • Bill Willingham, Fables, House of Mystery (Vertigo/DC)
I've already mentioned Hill and Straczynski, and I've read Willingham and Wagner on and off for a couple of decades now -- but discovering Tamaki and Skim was wonderful; that's a touching, closely imagined story told precisely the right way.

Best Writer/Artist

  • Rick Geary, A Treasury of XXth Century Murder: The Lindbergh Child (NBM); J. Edgar Hoover (Hill & Wang)
  • Emmanuel Guibert, Alan's War (First Second)
  • Jason Lutes, Berlin (Drawn & Quarterly)
  • Cyril Pedrosa, Three Shadows (First Second)
  • Nate Powell, Swallow Me Whole (Top Shelf)
  • Chris Ware, Acme Novelty Library (Acme)
Look at that line-up! It's the Murderer's Row of comics; there's no one you could pitch around here.

Best Penciller/Inker or Penciller/Inker Team

  • Gabriel Ba, The Umbrella Academy (Dark Horse)
  • Mark Buckingham/Steve Leialoha, Fables (Vertigo/DC)
  • Olivier Coipel/Mark Morales, Thor (Marvel)
  • Guy Davis, BPRD (Dark Horse)
  • Amy Reeder Hadley/Richard Friend, Madame Xanadu (Vertigo/DC)
  • Jillian Tamaki, Skim (Groundwood Books)
Best Painter/Multimedia Artist
  • Lynda Barry, What It Is (Drawn & Quarterly)
  • Eddie Campbell, The Amazing Remarkable Monsieur Leotard (First Second)
  • Enrico Casarosa, The Venice Chronicles (Atelier Fio/AdHouse)
  • Scott Morse, Tiger! Tiger! Tiger! (Red Window)
  • Jill Thompson, Magic Trixie, Magic Trixie Sleeps Over (HarperCollins Children's Books)
All of these people had really gorgeous, inventive art, on some very different projects.

Best Cover Artist

  • Gabriel Ba, Casanova (Image); The Umbrella Academy (Dark Horse)
  • Jo Chen, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Serenity (Dark Horse); Runaways (Marvel)
  • Amy Reeder Hadley, Madame Xanadu (Vertigo/DC)
  • James Jean, Fables (Vertigo/DC); The Umbrella Academy (Dark Horse)
  • Matt Wagner, Zorro (Dynamite); Grendel: Behold the Devil (Dark Horse)
Best Coloring
  • Steve Hamaker, Bone: Ghost Circles, Bone: Treasure Hunters (Scholastic Graphix)
  • Trish Mulvihill, Joker (DC), 100 Bullets (Vertigo/DC)
  • Val Staples, Criminal, Incognito (Marvel Icon)
  • Dave Stewart, Abe Sapien: The Drowning, BPRD, The Goon, Hellboy, Solomon Kane, The Umbrella Academy (Dark Horse); Body Bags (Image); Captain America: White (Marvel)
  • Chris Ware, Acme Novelty Library #19 (Acme)
One of the things I was looking for in this category was work that didn't just color skies blue and grass green, but helped to set a mood or define characters -- coloring that was willing to choose unusual palettes and bold transitions of colors when that's what the story needed. Mulvhill and Staples did that particularly well, and Stewart's always been great at setting mood through color.

Best Lettering

  • Faryl Dalrymple, Omega: The Unknown (Marvel)
  • Jimmy Gownley, Amelia Rules! (Renaissance)
  • Scott Morse, Tiger! Tiger! Tiger! (Red Window)
  • Nate Powell, Swallow Me Whole (Top Shelf)
  • Chris Ware, Acme Novelty Library #19 (Acme)
I think it's pretty clear what we were reponding to in this category -- real drawn lettering that works as art, both in itself and as part of the larger page, instead of being imposed by a computer program. All of these people did great work in that area, with very expressive lettering that complemented and strengthed their stories.

Best Comics-Related Periodical/Journalism
  • Comic Book Resources, produced by Jonah Weiland
  • The Comics Journal, edited by Gary Groth, Michael Dean, and Kristy Valenti (Fantagraphics)
  • The Comics Reporter, produced by Tom Spurgeon and Jordan Raphael
  • Comics Comics, edited by Timothy Hodler and Dan Nadel (PictureBox)
Best Comics-Related Book
  • Bill Mauldin: A Life Up Front, by Todd DePastino (Norton)
  • Brush with Passion: The Art and Life of Dave Stevens, edited by Arnie and Cathy Fenner (Underwood)
  • Drawing Words and Writing Pictures, by Jessica Abel and Matt Madden (First Second)
  • Kirby: King of Comics, by Mark Evanier (Abrams)
  • The Ten-Cent Plague: The Great Comic-Book Scare and How It Changed America, by David Hajdu (Picador/Farrar, Straus & Giroux)
I'll say it again: DePastino's Bill Mauldin is a great biography. I won't say that it deserves to win in this strong and mixed category...well, maybe I will. (Maybe that shows that I still have a lurking sense that words are more important than pictures? I hope not.)

Best Publication Design

  • Breakdowns: Portrait of the Artist as a Young %@&*! designed by Art Spiegelman (Pantheon)
  • Comic Book Tattoo, designed by Tom Muller, art direction by Rantz Hoseley (Image)
  • Hellboy Library Editions, designed by Cary Grazzini and Mike Mignola (Dark Horse)
  • What It Is, designed by Lynda Barry (Drawn & Quarterly)
  • Willie and Joe, designed by Jacob Covey (Fantagraphics)

These are some stunning-looking books; What It Is is one of the most interesting comics objects in many years and Willie and Joe is simply amazing.

Any complaints can be addressed here; I was one of the judges this year. (And it was a very different experience from my previous judgeship, for the World Fantasy Awards in 2006 -- not merely because the Eisners have four times as many categories, either.)

More thoughts on nominees may follow, but there's a lot of great work up there; nearly all of it will reward the reading attention of nearly anyone.

The Good Thief's Guide to Amsterdam by Chris Ewan

The Good Thief's Guide to Amsterdam is the first book in a mystery series that comes with a built-in series title style -- ...Paris is already in stores, with presumably ...Berlin and ...Budapest and ...Moscow and many more to follow if the readership is there -- all about a mystery novelist who not only writes about a master thief, but himself is a master thief. It won a contest in the UK -- the prize of which was, I believe, its UK publication by the company running the contest -- and it's a pleasant but minor novel.

Charlie Howard is that mystery novelist, an