Thomas Nelson jettisons editorial control for a new imprint, West Bow Press, which will be entirely packaged by "self-publisher" Author Solutions.
One more time: money flows towards the writer. And if you pay a company to publish your book, neither you nor they can be said to "self" publish anything.
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Another Sign of the Publishopocalypse
Recurring Motifs:
It's the Economy Stupid,
Splendors of Publishing
3 comments:
It fascinates me that books have this fear of self-publications when most other entertainment industries grant small creators special status. Indie movies, indie music, indie comics. But books? It's all "vanity press".
MORE money flows toward a good writer who jettison the middle man, makes the capital investment of printing themselves and is able to sell those.
Yes there are also a lot of crappy self-published writers, but that's what filtration is for. Publishers are one (very expensive) filter, but there are others. Reviews, blogs, fanbases.
Take a look at writers like Joey Comeau or groups like Topatoco for an example of what I mean.
Tim: There's nothing wrong with actually self-publishing. But the industry of "self-publishing" exists mostly to exploit wannabe writers. And, in fact, the concept of an industry of companies that sell self-publishing services is inherently ludicrous.
If an author wants to publish her book herself, she should. It probably won't go anywhere but her garage -- the distribution system doesn't work well for self-published books -- but it will waste less of her money and time than contracting with a company to "self-publish" her.
'Indie' movies, music, and comics, as commonly understood are published by companies that pay the creators, not the other way around, and are distributed professionally. 'Away We Go' doesn't get a massive multiplex release and advertising push, but it shows in real cinemas.
The equivalent to self-published books would be youtube-movies (or movies that can be seen only a particular website, for payment or tips), band-pressed tapes and CDs sold only in local record shops and at gigs, and comics that sell only at conventions and perhaps the local comics shop.
I can't think of any examples of the first, but I've seen plenty of self-produced comics and CDs. The comics are a hobby or a calling card, no-one expects them to get a wide distribution. The CDs are a way of making more money from gigs, and/or something to give to A&R people.
From what I've seen, the people producing them are more realistic about their functions and costs than most of the people paying to self-publish their books.
Post a Comment